Speech recognition technology and students with writing difficulties: Improving fluency

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 337-346

  Quinlan, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942590266     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.337     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinmann.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 69-93.
3. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Whitaker, D., Sylvester, L., & Nolen, S. B. (1995). Integrating low- and high-level skills in instructional protocols for writing disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 293-309.
5. Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower's model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, 2, 57-81.
6. Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K. B., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Rogan, L. W., Brooks, A., et al. (1997). Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 652-666.
7. Berninger, V., Whitaker, D., Feng, Y., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. D. (1996). Assessment of planning, translating, and revising in junior high writers. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 23-52.
8. Berninger, V. W., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbott, R. D. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing, 4, 257-280.
9. Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591-620.
10. Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (2000). Is graphic activity cognitively costly? A developmental approach. Reading and Writing, 13, 183-196.
11. Breetvelt, I., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). Rereading and generating and their relation to text quality: An application of multilevel analysis on writing process data. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models, and methodology in writing research (pp. 10-20). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
12. Cirello, V. J. (1986). The effect of wordprocessing on the writing abilities of tenth grade remedial students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 2531A.
13. Cochran Smith, M. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research, 61, 107-155.
14. De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1997). Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 203-222.
15. Diederich, P. B., French, J. W., & Carlton, S. T. (1961). Factors in the judgment of writing quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
16. Dragon Naturally Speaking Professional 5.0 [Computer program]. (2002). Burlington, MA: Lernout & Hauspie.
17. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., Fear, K. L., & Gregg, S. L. (1988). A case for writing intervention: Strategies for writing informational text. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3, 98-113.
18. Gerber, P. J., Schnieders, C. A., Paradise, L. A., Reiff, H. B., Ginsberg, R. J., & Popp, P. A. (1990). Persisting problems of adults with learning disabilities: Self-reported comparisons from their school-age and adult years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 570-573.
19. Gould, J. D. (1980). Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths, and some observations. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 98-127). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students' compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 781-791.
21. Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170-182.
22. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989). Components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353-361.
23. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1992). Cognitive strategy instruction in written language for learning disabled students. In S. Vogel & B. Levinson (Eds.), Educational alternatives for learning disabled students (pp. 91-115). New York: Springer-Verlag.
24. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C. A., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction for students with learning disabilities: Review of a research program. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 89-114.
25. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Hidi, S. E., & Hildyard, A. (1983). The comparison of oral and written productions in two discourse types. Discourse Processes, 6, 91-105.
27. Hunt, K. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35(1), 1-67.
28. Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 355-365.
29. Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Klecan-Aker, J. S., & Brueggman, L. (1991). The expression connection. Vero Beach, FL: Speech Bin.
31. Kurth, R. J. (1987). Using word processing to enhance revision strategies. Educational Technology, 27, 13-19.
32. Levin, J., Boruta, M. J., & Vascocellos, M. T. (1983). Microcomputer-based environments for writing: A writer's assistant. In A. C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Classroom computers and cognitive science (pp. 219-232). New York: Academic Press.
33. MacArthur, C. A., & Cavalier, A. R. (2000). Dictation and speech recognition technology as accommodations in large-scale assessments for students with learning disabilities. Retrieved March 10, 2004, from http://www.doe. state.de.us/aab/dstp_research.html
34. MacArthur, C. A., & Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students' composing under three methods of text production: Handwriting, word processing, and dictation. Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 22-42.
35. MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., Schwartz, S. S., & Schafer, W. D. (1995). Evaluation of a writing instruction model that integrated a process approach, strategy instruction, and word processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 278-291.
36. Matsuhashi, A. (1981). Pausing and planning: The tempo of written discourse production. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 113-134.
37. McCutchen, D. (1987). Children's discourse skill: Form and modality requirements of schooled writing. Discourse Processes, 10, 267-286.
38. McCutchen, D. (1994). The magical number three, plus or minus two. Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, 2, 1-30.
39. McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S. H., & Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 256-266.
40. Moran, M. R. (1981). A comparison of formal features of written language of learning disabled, low-achieving and achieving secondary students. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
41. Newcomer, P. L., & Barenbaum, E. M. (1991). The written composing ability of children with learning disabilities: A review of the literature from 1980 to 1990. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 578-593.
42. Nold, E. W., & Freedman, S. W. (1977). An analysis of readers' responses to essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 11, 164-174.
43. Poteet, J. A. (1979). Characteristics of written expression of learning disabled and non-learning disabled elementary school students. Diagnostique, 4, 60-74.
44. Reece, J. E., & Gumming, G. (1996). Evaluating speech-based composition methods: Planning, dictation, and the listening word processor. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 361-380). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Sawyer, R. J., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340-352.
46. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Goleman, H. (1982). The role of production factors in writing ability. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 175-210). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47. Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1995). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
48. Spandel, V., & Stiggins, R. J. (1990). Creating writers: Linking assessment and writing instruction. New York: Longman.
49. Veal, L. R. (1974). Syntactic measures and rated quality in the writing of young children. Athens: University of Georgia.
50. Vogel, S. A., & Moran, M. (1982). Written language disorders in learning disabled college students: A preliminary report. In W. Cruickshank & J. Lerner (Eds.), Coming of age: The best of ACLD (Vol. 3, pp. 137-157). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
51. Woodcock, R., & Johnson, B. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - Revised Tests of Achievement. Chicago: Riverside Publishing.