A retrospective study of two-stage treatment outcomes assessed with two modified PAR indices

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 521-526

  McKnight, M Mary ^a   Daniels, Charles P ^b   Johnston, Lysle E ^c  

^a JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional appliances; Nonextraction treatment; PAR index; Two stage treatment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEER REVIEW; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3042894640     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Muir JD. Report of the occlusal index committee. Dental Practice 1987, September 9-12.
2. Pickering EA, Vig P. The occlusal index used to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1975; 2: 47-51
3. Elderton RJ, Clark JD. Orthodontic treatment in the General Dental Service assessed by the occlusal index. Br J Orthod 1983; 14: 178-86.
4. Shaw WC, Richmond S, O'Brien KD. The use of occlusal indicies: A European perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 107: (1) 1-10
5. Shaw WC. A comparison of orthodontic services in England and Wales, the Netherlands and Scandinavia. Eur J Orthod 1983; 5: 295-305
6. Richmond S. Personal audit in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 131-140
7. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD, et al. The development of the PAR index (peer assessment rating): Reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 125-39.
8. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Stephens CD, Webb WA, Roberts CT, Andrews M. Orthodontics in the General Dental Services of England and Wales: A critical assessment of standards. Br Dent J 1993; 174: 315-329
9. O'Brien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 25-35.
10. O'Brien KD, Weyant RJ. Process analysis of treatment provided by the hospital orthodontic service. Br J Orthod 1993; 2: 131-4.
11. DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KWL, Vig PS, Weyant RJ, O'Brien KD. The validation of the PAR (peer assessment rating) for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;107: 172-6.
12. Edwards IG. Righting the wrong paradigm. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 110: 16A-8A.
13. Meach CL. A cephalometric comparison of bony profile changes in Class II Division 1 patients treated with extra-oral force and functional jaw orthopaedics. Am J Orthod 1966; 52: 353-370.
14. Pancherz H. The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: A cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 100: 220-233.
15. Wieslander L. Long term effect of treatment with headgear - Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 104: 319-329.
16. Liveratos FA, Johnston LE Jr. A comparison of one-and two-stage nonextraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 108: 118-31.
17. O'Brien KD, Robbins R, Vig KWL, Vig PS, Shnorhokian H, Weyant R. The effectiveness of Class II Division 1 treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;107:329-34.
18. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR index (peer assessment rating): Methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvements and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 180-187.
19. Turbill EA, Richmond S. Assessment of GDS Orthodontic standards: The DPB's gradings compared to PAR and IOTN. Br J Orthod 1996; 23: 211-220.
20. Hinman C. The Dental Practice Board: Orthodontics - the current status. Practice Management Forum. Br J Orthod 1995; 22: 287-90.
21. Fox NA. The first 100 cases: A personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Br J Orthod 1993; 174: 290-297.
22. Turbill EA, Richmond S, Wright JL. A critical assessment of orthodontic standards in England and Wales (1990-1991) in relation to changes in prior approval. Br J Orthod 1996; 23: 221-228