Fluid critical points from simulations: The Bruce - Wilding method and Yang - Yang anomalies

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 108, Issue 21, 2004, Pages 6750-6759

  Kim, Young C ^a   Fisher, Michael E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

BRUCE-WILDING METHOD; CHEMICAL POTENTIAL; ENERGY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; THERMAL SCALING;

FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 2942564173     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp037071f     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. See, e.g.: (a) Binder, K. In Computational Methods in Field Theory; Gausterer, H., Lang, C. B., Eds.; Springer, Berlin, 1992; pp 59-125. (b) Privman, V., Ed. Finite-Size Scaling and Numerical Simulation of Statistical Systems; World Scientific: Singapore, 1990.
2. See, e.g.: (a) Binder, K. In Computational Methods in Field Theory; Gausterer, H., Lang, C. B., Eds.; Springer, Berlin, 1992; pp 59-125. (b) Privman, V., Ed. Finite-Size Scaling and Numerical Simulation of Statistical Systems; World Scientific: Singapore, 1990.
3. Bruce, A. D.; Wilding, N. B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 193.
4. Wilding, N. B.; Bruce, A. D. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1992, 4, 3087.
5. Wilding, N. B. Z. Phys. B 1993, 93, 119.
6. Hilfer, R.; Wilding, N. B. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 1995, 28, L281.
7. Wilding, N. B.; Müller, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 2562.
8. Wilding, N. B. Phys. Rev. E 1995, 52, 602.
9. Müller, M.; Wilding, N. B. Phys. Rev. E 1995, 51, 2079.
10. Wilding, N. B. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1996, 8, 9637.
11. Wilding, N. B.; Nielaba, P. Phys. Rev. E 1996, 53, 926.
12. Wilding, N. B. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 55, 6624.
13. Caillol, J. M.; Levesque, D.; Weis, J. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 1565; 2002, 116, 10794.
14. Caillol, J. M.; Levesque, D.; Weis, J. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 1565; 2002, 116, 10794.
15. Caillol, J. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 4885.
16. Orkoulas, G.; Panagiotopoulos, A. Z. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 110, 1581.
17. Rummukainen, K.; Tsypin, M.; Kajantie, K.; Laine, M.; Shaposhnikov, M. Nucl. Phys. B 1998, 532, 283.
18. Romero-Enrique, J. M.; Orkoulas, G.; Panagiotopoulos, A. Z.; Fisher, M. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 4558.
19. Yan, Q. L.; de Pablo, J. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 1727; Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 2054.
20. Yan, Q. L.; de Pablo, J. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 1727; Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 2054.
21. Camp, P. J.; Patey, G. N. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 399.
22. Panagiotopoulos, A. Z. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 3007.
23. Panagiotopoulos, A. Z.; Fisher, M. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 045701.
24. Moghaddam, S.; Panagiotopoulos, A. Z. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 7556.
25. Mermin, N. D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1971, 26, 169.
26. Rehr, J. J.; Mermin, N. D. Phys. Rev. A 1973, 8, 472.
27. Kim, Y. C.; Fisher, M. E.; Barbosa, M. C. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 933. This reference may be consulted for definitions and values of the standard critical exponents: see also refs 31, 33, and 39 below.
28. Nicolaides, D.; Bruce, A. D. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 1988, 21, 233.
29. Bruce, A. D.; Wilding, N. B. Phys. Rev. E 1999, 60, 3748.
30. Tsypin, M. M.; Blöte, H. W. J. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62, 73.
31. Fisher, M. E.; Ma, S.; Nickel, B. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1972, 29, 917.
32. Sak, J. Phys. Rev. B 1973, 8, 281.
33. Hilfer, R. Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 1994, 96, 63.
34. Weingärtner, H.; Schröer, W. Adv. Chem. Phys. 2001, 116, 1: see, especially, section III.B.
35. Fisher, M. E.; Orkoulas, G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 696.
36. Kim, Y. C.; Fisher, M. E.; Orkoulas, G. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 67, 061506.
37. Yang, C. N.; Yang, C. P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1964, 13, 303.
38. Orkoulas, G.; Fisher, M. E.; Üstün, C. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 7530.
39. Orkoulas, G.; Fisher, M. E.; Panagiotopoulos, A. Z. Phys. Rev. E 2001, 63, 051507.
40. Kim, Y. C.; Fisher, M. E.; Luijten, E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 065701.
41. Kostrowicka Wyczalkowska, A.; Anisimov, M. A.; Sengers, J. V.; Kim, Y. C. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 4202.
42. Kim, Y. C.; Fisher, M. E. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 65, 041506.
43. Luijten, E.; Fisher, M. E.; Panagiotopoulos, A. Z. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 185701.
44. k).
45. For hyperscaling in the context of finite-size systems see: Privman, V.; Fisher, M. E. Phys. Rev. B 1984, 30, 322.
46. We neglect here, with confidence, because we are concerned only with finite systems with well-behaved underlying Boltzmann distributions, those pathological situations in which knowledge of all the moments may not be adequate to reconstruct the full distribution. See, e.g.: Padé Approximants, 2nd ed.; Baker, G. A., Jr., Graves-Morris, P., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1996; pp 213-264.
47. δ (y), in simulations of finite systems.
48. 26 However, this approach becomes more difficult in asymmetric situations where the number and energy densities are mixed in the scaling variables. At this stage, further developments seem necessary to deal effectively with the issue.
49. c.