Enhanced hairpin stability through loop design: The case of the protein G B1 domain hairpin

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 23, 2004, Pages 7238-7243

  Fesinmeyer, R Matthew ^a   Hudson, F Michael ^a   Andersen, Niels H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COULOMB BLOCKADE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MELTING; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION);

CIRCULAR DICHROISM (CD); ENHANCED HAIRPIN STABILITY; PROTON CHEMICAL SHIFTS;

PROTEINS;

ASPARAGINYLPROLYLALANYLTHREONYLGLYCYLLYSINE; ASPARTYLASPARTYLALANYLTHREONYLLYSYLTHREONINE; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; LYSINE; TRYPTOPHAN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; HYDROPHOBICITY; MELTING POINT; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN G B1 DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; HYDROGEN BONDING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 2942562092     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0379520     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Gellman, S. H. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 717-725.
2. Syud, F. A.; Espinosa, J. F.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11577-11578.
3. Searle, M. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 1011-1020.
4. Kobayashi, N.; Endo, S.; Munekata, E. Pept. Chem. 1993, 278-280.
5. Blanco, F. J.; Rivas, G.; Serrano, L. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1994, 1, 584-590.
6. 2O data range was 55 ± (vide infra and Supporting Information), with a fold population estimate of 30% at 298 K.
7. Muñoz, V.; Thompson, P. A.; Hofrichter, J.; Eaton, W. A. Nature 1997, 390, 196-199.
8. Honda, S.; Kobayashi, N.; Munekata, E. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 269-278.
9. Cochran, A. G.; Skelton, N. J.; Starovasnik, M. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 5578-5583.
10. Muñoz, V.; Henry, E. R.; Hofrichter, J.; Eaton, W. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 5872-5879.
11. (a) Dinner, A. R.; Lazaridis, T.; Karplus, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 9068-9073.
12. (b) Pande, V. S.; Rokhsar, D. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 9062-9067.
13. (c) Roccatano, D.; Amadei, A.; Di Nola, A.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Protein Sci. 1999, 8, 2130-2143.
14. Sibanda, B. L.; Thorton, J. M. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 202, 59-82.
15. Espinosa, J. F.; Gellman; S. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2330-2333.
16. Espinosa, J. F.; Muñoz, V.; Gellman, S. H. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 306, 397-402.
17. Espinosa, J. F.; Syud, F. A.; Gellman, S. H. Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 1492-1505.
18. Kobayashi, N.; Honda, S.; Yoshii, H.; Munekata, E. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 6564-6571.
19. Haque, T. S.; Gellman, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2303-2304.
20. Kiehna, S. E.; Waters, M. L. Protein Sci. 2003, 12, 2657-2667.
21. (a) Andersen, N. H.; Liu, Z.; Prickett, K. S. FEBS Lett. 1996, 399, 47-52.
22. (b) Andersen, N. H.; Brodsky, Y.; Neidigh, J. W.; Prickett, K. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 79-85.
23. Andersen, N. H.; Neidigh, J. W.; Harris, S. M.; Lee, G. M.; Liu, Z.; Tong, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8547-8561.
24. Merutka, G.; Dyson, H. J.; Wright, P. E. J. Biomol. NMR 1995, 5, 14-24.
25. Wishart, D. S.; Bigam, C. G.; Holm, A.; Hodges, R. S.; Sykes, B. D. J. Biomol. NMR 1995, 5, 67-81.
26. Schwarzinger, S.; Kroon, G. J. A.; Foss, T. R.; Wright, P. E.; Dyson, H. J. J. Biomol. NMR 2000, 18, 43-48.
27. Schwarzinger, S.; Kroon, G. J. A.; Foss, T. R.; Chung, J.; Wright, P. E. ; Dyson, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2970-2978.
28. Andersen, N. H.; Chen, C.; Lee, G. M. Protein Pept. Lett. 1995, 1, 215-222.
29. Burke, D. F.; Deane, C. M.; Blundell, T. L. Bioinformatics 2000, 16, 513-519.
30. (a) de Alba, E.; Blanco, F. J.; Jiménez, M. A.; Rico, M.; Nieto, J. L. Eur. J. Biochem. 1995, 233, 283-292.
31. (b) Ramírez-Alvarado, M.; Blanco, F. J.; Serrano, L. Protein Sci. 2001, 10, 1381-1392.
32. Griffiths-Jones, S. R.; Maynard, A. J.; Searle, M. S. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 292, 1051-1069.
33. Andersen, N. H.; Dyer, R. B.; Fesinmeyer, R. M.; Gai, F.; Maness, S.; Werner, J. H. In Peptides 2000; Martinez, J., Fehrentz, J.-A., Eds.; EDK: Paris, France, 2001; pp 553-554.
34. 12 mutants (GB1m1 and HP5A).
35. Andersen, N. H.; Dyer, R. B.; Fesinmeyer, R. M.; Gai, F.; Liu, Z.; Neidigh, J. W.; Tong, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9879-9880.
36. Stanger, H. E.; Syud, F. A.; Espinosa, J. F.; Giriat, I.; Muir, T.; Gellman, S. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2001, 98, 12015-12020.
37. Tatko, C. D.; Waters, M. L. Protein Sci. 2003, 12, 2443-2452.
38. Tatko, C. D.; Waters, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2028-2034.
39. 37 that cannot form hairpin structures.
40. Sharman, G. J.; Searle, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120 5291-5300.
41. (a) Dyson, H. J.; Rance, M.; Houghten, R. A.; Lerner, R. A.; Wright, P. E. J. Mol. Biol, 1988, 201, 161-200,
42. (b) Wright, P. E.; Dyson, H. J.; Lerner, R. A. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 7167-7175,
43. (c) Campbell, A. P.; Sykes, B. D.; Norrby, E.; Assa-Munt, N.; Dyson, H. J. Folding Des. 1996, 1, 157-165.
44. Sharman, G. J.; Griffiths-Jones, S. R.; Jourdan, M.; Searle, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12318-12324.
45. There are some exceptions to the CSDs predicted by Figure 1; these are attributed to ring current shifts that are in the opposite direction of the diamagnetic anisotropy effects due to backbone amide units.
46. Blanco, F. J.; Serrano, L. Eur. J. Biochem. 1995, 230, 634-649.
47. 7 assumed a significantly larger fold population, we suggest that the conclusions may need to be reevaluated in light of the present study. In addition, GB1p should no longer be viewed as the model for folding simulations of β hairpins as there are many better-folded β-hairpin structures available.
48. Cierpicki, T.; Zhukov, I.; Byrd, R. A.; Otlewski, J. J. Magn. Reson. 2002, 157, 178-180.
49. Derived from the fraction folded values for GB1p and GB1m2 at 25 °C.
50. Derived from the fraction folded values for GB1m2 and GB1m3 at 37 °C; the higher temperature was selected since the calculated folded fraction of GB1m3 is less influenced by the choice of the 100% folded shift values at this temperature.