Effects of self-apprmsal information, appraisal purpose, and feedback target on performance appraisal ratings

Journal of Business and Psychology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 283-298

  Shore, Ted H ^a   Adams, Janet S ^a   Tashchian, Armen ^a  

^a KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032398219     PISSN: 08893268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025071329102     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Antonioni, D. (1994). The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings. Personnel Psychology, 47, 351-356.
2. Basset, G.A. & Meyer, H.H. (1968). Performance appraisal based on self-review. Personnel Psychology, 21, 421-430.
3. Bernardin, H.J. Orban, J. and Carlyle, J. (1981). Performance ratings as a function of trust in appraisal and rate individual differences. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 311-315.
4. Blumberg, H.H. (1972). Communication of interpersonal evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 157-162.
5. Burke, R.J., Weitzel, W., & Weis, T. (1978). Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews: Replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 37, 703-710.
6. Campbell, D.J., & Lee, C. (1988). Self-appraisal in performance evaluation: Development versus evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 13, 302-314.
7. Farh, J., Werbel, J.D., & Bedeian, A. G. (1988). An empirical investigation of self-appraisal-based performance evaluation. Personnel Psychology, 41, 141-156.
8. Ferris, G.R., Yates, V.L., Gilbron, D.C, & Rowland, K. (1985). The influence of subordinate age on performance ratings and causal attributions. Personnel Psychology, 38, 545-557.
9. Fisher, C.D. (1979). Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinates: A laboratory investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 533-540.
10. Fusilier, M.R. (1980). The effects of anonymity and outcome contingencies on rater beliefs and behavior in a performance appraisal situation. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 273-277.
11. Hare, A.P. (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). NY: Free Press.
12. Harris, M.M. (1994). Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework. Journal of Management, 20, 737-756.
13. Harris, M.H., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisory, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43-62.
14. Ilgen, D.R., & Knowlton, W.A. (1980). Performance attributional effects on feedback from supervisors. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 441-456.
15. Jones, E.E., & Wortman, C. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
16. Kay, E., Meyer, H., & French, J. (1965). Effects of threat in a performance interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 311-317.
17. Klimoski, R. & Inks, L. (1990). Accountability forces in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 194-208.
18. Korsgaard, M.A., Roberson, L., & Klein, D.A. (1991). The effect of self-appraisal and participation on subsequent performance. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, 1991.
19. Landy, F.J., & Farr, J.L. (1983). The measurement of work performance: Methods, theory, and applications. New York: Academic Press.
20. Larson, J.R. (1984). The performance feedback process: A preliminary model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 42-76.
21. Latham, G. (1986). Job performance and appraisal. In C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chichester, England: Wiley.
22. Longenecker, C.O., Gioia, D.A., & Sims, H.P. (1987). Behind the Mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 183-193.
23. Murphy, K.R., Balzer, W.K., Kellam, K.L., & Armstrong, J. (1984). Effect of purpose of rating on accuracy in observing teacher behavior and evaluating teaching performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 45-54.
24. Murphy, K.R., & Cleveland, J.N. (1991). Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective. Boston: Allyn Bacon.
25. Stone, T.H. (1973). An examination of six prevalent assumptions concerning performance appraisal. Public Personnel Management, 5, 408-414.
26. Tesser, A., & Rosen, S. (1975). The reluctance to transmit bad news. In Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.8). New York: Academic Press.
27. Tetlock, P.E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In B.M Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 7, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
28. Tetlock, P.E., & Kim, J.I. (1987). Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 700-709.
29. Thornton, G.C. III (1980). Psychometric properties of self-appraisals of job performance. Personnel Psychology, 33, 263-271.
30. Wexley, K.N., & Klimoski, R.J. (1984). Performance appraisal: An update. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 2, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
31. Williams, K.J., DeNisi, A.S., Blencoe, A.G, & Cafferty, T.P. (1985). The role of appraisal purpose: Effects of purpose on information acquisition and utilization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 314-339.
32. Zedeck, S., & Cascio, W.F. (1982). Performance appraisal decisions as a function of rater training and purpose of the appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 752-758.