Teacher-student interactions and learning outcomes in a distance learning environment

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 65-75

  Offir, Baruch ^a   Barth, Ingrid ^a   Lev, Yoseph ^a   Shteinbok, Arkady ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Content analysis; Interaction analysis; Learning by doing; Learning outcome; New economy; Performance based assessment; Self evaluation

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

CONTENT ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE-BASED ASSESSMENTS; SELF-EVALUATION; TEACHER-STUDENT INTERACTIONS;

DISTANCE EDUCATION;

EID: 2942514868     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00162-8     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bransford J.D., Brown A.L., Cocking R.R. How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school. 2000;National Academy Press, Washington.
2. Cookson P.S., Chang Y. The multidimensional audio conferencing classification system. American Journal of Distance Education. 9(3):1995;18-35.
3. Feuerstein R., Feuerstein S. Mediated learning experience: a theoretical review. Feuerstein R., Klein P.S., Tannenbaum A.J. Mediated learning experience: theoretical, psychological and learning implications. 1991;3-53 Freund Publishing House, London.
4. Feuerstein R., Tannenbaum A.J. Mediating the learning experiences of gifted underachievers. Wallace B., Adams H.B. Worldwide perspectives on the gifted disadvantaged. 1993;AB Academic Publishers, Natal.
5. Giddens A. The third way: the renewal of social democracy. 1999;Polity Press, Melden, MA.
6. Henri F. Computer conference and content analysis. Kaye A.R. Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. 1992;117-136 Springer Verlag, Berlin.
7. Mory E.M. Feedback research. Jonassen D.H. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. 1996;919-956 Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York.
8. Offir B., Lev J. Constructing aid for evaluating teacher-learner interaction in DL (distance learning). Educational Media International. 37(2):2000;91-97.
9. Offir B., Lev Y., Lev Y., Barth I. Using interaction content analysis to assess distance education. Computers in Schools. 18(2-3):2001;27-41.
10. Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (1996). An investigation of the nature and form of interaction in live interactive television. (Eric Document Number 396738).
11. Perkins D.N. Smart schools. 1992;Free Press, New York.
12. Stubbs E., Delamont S. Explorations in classroom observation. Croll P. Systematic classroom observation. 1986;Falmer Press, London.
13. Terman L.M., Oden M.H. Genetic studies of genius: the gifted group at mid-life. 1959;Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
14. Tzuriel D. Cognitive modifiability, mediated learning experience and affective-motivational processes: a transactional approach. Feuerstein R., Klein P.S., Tannenbaum A.J. Mediated learning experience: theoretical, psychological and learning implications. 1991;95-120 Freund Publishing House, London.