A relational representation for procedural task knowledge

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 3, Issue , 2005, Pages 1280-1285

  Hart, Stephen ^a   Grupen, Roderic ^a   Jensen, David ^a  

^a Biologically Inspired Neural and Dynamical Systems Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge representation; Machine perception; Robotics

Indexed keywords

HUMANOID ROBOTS; MACHINE PERCEPTION; PROCEDURAL TASK KNOWLEDGE; SENSORIMOTORS;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

EID: 29344441068     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Arbib, M. 1995. Schema theory. In The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Computation, 830-834. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Coelho, J. A.; Piater, J. H.; and Grupen, R. A. 2001. Developing haptic and visual perceptual categories for reaching and grasping with a humanoid robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems Journal 37(2-3):195-219.
3. Coelho, J. A. 2001. Multifingered Grasping: Grasp Reflexes and Control Context. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
4. Fitzpatrick, P.; Metta, G.; Natale, L.; Rao, S.; and Sandini, G. 2003. Learning about objects through action: Initial steps towards artificial cognition. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
5. Friedman, N.; Getoor, L.; Koller, D.; and Pfeffer, A. 1999. Learning probabilistic relational models. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence.
6. Gallese, V.; Fadiga, L.; Fogassi, L.; and Rizzolatti, G. 1996. Action recognition in the premotor context. Brain 119:593-609.
7. Gibson, J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, 67-82. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Ginsburg, H., and Opper, S. 1988. Piaget's Theory of Intellectual Development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall Inc.
9. Huber, M., and Grupen, R. 1996. A hybrid discrete dynamic systems approach to robot control. Technical Report 96-43, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
10. Huber, M. 2000. A Hybrid Architecture for Adaptive Robot Control. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
11. Kupiers, B.; Beeson, P.; Modayil, J.; and Provost, J. 2005. Bootstrap learning of foundational representations. In Developmental Robotics, AAAI Spring Symposium Series.
12. Mandler, J. M. 2004. The Foundations of Mind: Origins of Conceptual Thought. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13. Nakamura, Y. 1991. Advanced Robotics: Redundancy and Optimization. Addison-Wesley.
14. Natale, L.; Metta, G.; and Sandini, G. 2004. Learning haptic representation of objects. In International Conference on Intelligent Manipulation and Grasping.
15. Neville, J., and Jensen, D. 2003. Collective classication with relational dependency networks. In 2nd Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining, KDD.
16. Neville, J., and Jensen, D. 2004. Dependency networks for relational data. In Proceedings of The Fourth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.
17. Neville, J.; Jensen, D.; Friedland, L.; and Hay, M. 2003. Learning relational probability trees. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
18. Piater, J. H. 2001. Visual Feature Learning. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
19. Platt Jr., R.; Fagg, A. H.; and Grupen, R. A. 2002. Nullspace composition of control laws for grasping. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
20. Roy, D.; Gorniak, P.; Mukherjee, N.; and Juster, J. 2002. A trainable spoken language understanding system for visual object selection. In International Conference for Spoken Language Processing.