Impression success using the dual arch technique

General Dentistry

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 396-397

  Small, Bruce W ^a,b,c  

^a University of Medicine of New Jersey ^*

^b LD Pankey Institute   (United States)

^c Pankey Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

DENTAL CARE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; SHORT SURVEY; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL OCCLUSION, CENTRIC; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS;

EID: 29244490588     PISSN: 03636771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (6)

1. Lane DA, Randall RC, Lane NS, Wilson NH. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorat. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:141-145.
2. Cox JR, Brandt RL, Hughes HJ. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:510-515.
3. Breeding LC, Dixon DL. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:403-407.
4. Vasilakis GJ, Vasilakis MD. Adding the closed mouth impression technique to a cast impression coping technique. Gen Dent 2004;52:405-407.
5. Ceyhan JA, Johnson GH, Lepe X. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:143-149.
6. Personal communication with Vincent Paradiso, Millenium Dental Products. December 6, 2004.