|
Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 141-145
|
A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
COMPUTER PROGRAM;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DATA ANALYSIS;
DENTAL ASSISTANT;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MALE;
MEDICAL ASSESSMENT;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
MOUTH OCCLUSION PRESSURE;
ORTHODONTICS;
RANDOMIZATION;
TASTE;
TOOTH ARCH;
TOOTH CROWN;
AGED;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
DENTAL IMPRESSION;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
TIME;
BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;
ADULT;
AGED;
CROWNS;
DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS;
DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 0038050765
PISSN: 00223913
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2003.25 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (22)
|
References (6)
|