The differences of regulatory models and internet regulation in the european union and the united states

Information and Communications Technology Law

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 259-272

  May, Bruce E ^a   Chen, Jeng Chung V ^b   Wen, Kuang Wei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29244482734     PISSN: 13600834     EISSN: 14698404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1360083042000289077     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aglion M, (2000) Bridging the Gap: Privacy and in the EU and US Paper presented at the, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 27–29 April
2. Altman I, (1975) The Environment and Asocial Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding Monterey, CA, Brooks/Cole)
3. AT&T (1999) Beyond Concern: Understanding Net Users' Attitudes about Online Privacy (AT&T Labs-Research Technical Report TR 99.4), 3 April 1999. Available online at: www.research.att.com/library/trs/TRs/99/99.4/ (accessed 10 August 2000)
4. Banisar D, (2000) Privacy & Human Rights II: An International Survey of Privacy Laws and Development Washington DC, Electronic Privacy Information Center/London, Privacy International). Available online at: www.privacyinternational.org/survey/phr2000 (accessed 18 July 2001)
5. Bell T, (1991) Polycentric law Humane Studies Review 7. Available online at: http://osf1.gmu.edu/∼ihs/w91issues.html (accessed 2 March 2002)
6. Benson BL, (1991) The Enterprise of Law pp. 15–21 (San Francisco, CA, Pacific Research Institute)
7. Bolkestein F, (1999) European Union Electronic Commerce Directive Available online at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/media/eleccommm/99-952.html (accessed 8 November 2001)
8. Chen J, (2003) Internet Privacy Policies: A Narrative Policy Analysis of Regulation vs. Self-regulation Paper presented at the EC 2003 Conference on Electronic Commerce and Digital Life, Taipei, Taiwan
9. Drucker SJ, Gumpert G, (1999) Real Law @ Virtual Space: Regulation in Cyberspace (Hampton, NJ, Hampton Press)
10. Foddy, WH, and Finighan, WR. (1991). The concept of privacy from a symbolic interaction perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 10: pp. 1–7
11. GVU (1997) 8th WWW User Survey Available online at: www.gvu.gatech.edu/user_surveys/survey-1997-10 (accessed 16 June 1999)
12. Henten, A, and Kristensen, TM. (2000). Information society visions in the Nordic countries. Telematics and Informatics, 17: pp. 77–104
13. Hixson RF, (1987) Privacy in a Public Society (New York, Oxford University Press)
14. Hofstede G, (1980) Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values (Newbury Park, CA, Sage)
15. Hofstede G, (1991) Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind (London, McGraw Hill)
16. Johnson DR, Post DG, (1996a) And How Shall the Net Be Governed? A Meditation on the Relative Virtues of Decentralized, Emergent Law Unpublished paper, Temple University. Available online at: www.temple.edu/lawschool/dpost/writings.html#RecentWritings
17. Johnson, DR, and Post, DG. (1996b). Law and borders: The rise of law in cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 48: pp. 13–67
18. Mason, RO. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly, 10: pp. 5–12
19. Oakes C, (1999) A European's net view of US, Wired News30 August. Available online at: www.wired.com/news/politics/0, 1283, 21476, 00.html (accessed 29 April 2000)
20. Oberding J, Norderhaug T, (1996) A separate jurisdiction for cyberspace? Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 2. Available online at: www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue1/juris.html (accessed 8 May 2002)
21. Privacy and American Business (1998) E-commerce and Privacy: What Net Users Want (Hackensack, NJ, Privacy and American Business). Available online at: www.pandab.org/E-Commerce%20Summary.html lpar;accessed 7 April 1999)
22. Reidenberg, JR. (1996). Governing networks and cyberspace rule-making. Emory Law Journal, 45: pp. 912–938
23. Siefert JW, (2000) Who Will Protect Your Privacy? Competing Rule Systems and the Regulation of the Internet Paper presented to the 41st Annual International Studies Association Convention
24. Sterling B, (1996) Hacker Crackdown: Law and Disorder on the Electronic Frontier (New York, Bantam)
25. Stranieri, A, and Zeleznikow, J. (2001). Copyright regulation with argumentation agents. Information and Communications Technology Law, 10: pp. 109–123
26. Stuckey K, (1994) Internet and Online Law (New York, Law Journal/Seminars Press)
27. Swindle OG, (1999) Address to the Reston Chamber of Commerce, 8 April Available online at: www.ftc.gov/speeches/swindle/reston.htm (accessed 18 February 2001)
28. US Government (2001) A Framework for Global Electronic Commerce Available online at: www.whitehouse.gov/WH/New/Commerce/index.html (accessed May 2002)
29. Varney C, (1998) OECD Panel 1: The Role of Business and Government in International Consumer Protection Varney Christine, Session 3, ‘Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: Who Protects Consumers? Gateways to the Global Market: Consumers and Electronic Commerce’, in OECD Proceedings (Paris, OECD)
30. Venturelli S, (1998) Liberalising the European Media: Politics, Regulation and the Public Sphere (Oxford, Oxford University Press)