Detachable coil for cerebral aneurysms: In vitro evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 3T

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 363-366

  Shellock, Frank G ^a,c   Gounis, Matthew ^b   Wakhloo, Ajay ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEATING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMPLANT; MAGNETIC FIELD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SAFETY; SIGNAL DETECTION;

ARTIFACTS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEAT; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM;

EID: 29244468417     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, Holman R, International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267-1274
2. Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Mawad M. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acuteintracranial ancurysni: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg 1997;86:475-482
3. Tournade A, Courtheoux P, Sengel C, Ozgulle S, Tajahmady T. Saccular intracranial aneurysms: endovascular treatment with mechanical detachable spiral coils. Radiology 1997;202:481-486
4. Vallee J-N, Pierot L, Bonafe A, Turjman F, Flandroy P, Berge J, Rodesch G, Bracard S. Endovascular treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms using three-dimensional coils: predictors of immediate anatomic and clinical results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:298-306
5. Kahara VJ, Seppanen SK, Ryymin PS, Mattila P, Laasonen EM. MR angiography with three-dimensional time-of-flight and targeted maximum-intensity-projection reconstructions in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms embolized with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1470-1475
6. Biondi A, Oppenheim C, Vivas E, Casasco A, Lalam T, Sourour N, Jean LL, Dormont D, Marsault C. Cerebral aneurysms treated by Guglielmi detachable coils: evaluation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:957-963
7. Hennemeyer CT, Wicklow K, Feinberg DA, Derdeyn CP. In vitro evaluation of platinum Guglielmi detachable coils at 3 T with a porcine model: Safety issues and artifacts. Radiology 2001;219:732-737
8. Shellock FG. Reference manual for magnetic resonance safety, implants, and devices: 2005 edition. Biomedical Research Publishing Group, Los Angeles, CA, 2005
9. Shellock FG. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:721-732
10. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International: F2052. Standard test method for measurement of magnetically induced displacement force on passive implants in the magnetic resonance environment. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 13.01 Medical Devices; West Conshohocken, PA, 2001;pp: 1576-1580
11. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International. F2182 Test method for measurement of radio frequency induced heating near passive implants during magnetic resonance imaging. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, West Conshohocken, PA2003
12. Rezai AR, Finelli D, Nyenhuis JA, Hrdlick G, Tkach J, Ruggieri P, Stypulkowski PH, Sharan A, Shellock FG. Neurostimulator for deep brain stimulation: Ex vivo evaluation of MRI-related heating at 1.5-Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:241-250
13. Shellock FG, Kanal E. Aneurysm clips: Evaluation of MR imaging artifacts at 1.5 Tesla. Radiology 1998;209:563-566
14. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International: F2119 Test method for evaluation of MR image artifacts from passive implants. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, West Conshohocken, PA2003
15. Hug J, Nagel E, Bornstedt A, Schackenburg B, Oswald H, Fleck E. Coronary arterial stents: safety and artifacts during MR imaging. Radiology 2000;216:781-787
16. Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KY, et al. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenot 1998;171:1207-1213.
17. Shellock FG, Crues JV. Commentary: MR safety and the American College of Radiology White Paper. AJR Am J Roentgenology 2002; 178:1349-1352