Studio Art as Research Practice

Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 795-814

  Sullivan, Graeme ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29244463298     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410609939-43     Document Type: Chapter

References (119)

1. Adams, L. S. (1996). The methodologies of art: An introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2. Amundsen, R., Serlin, R. & Lehrer, R. (1992). On the threats that do not face educational research. Educational Researcher, 21(9), 19-23.
3. Arnheim, R. (1986). New essays on the psychology of art. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
4. Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
5. Arnstine, D. (1965). Needed research and the role of definitions in art. Studies in Art Education, 7(1), 2-17.
6. Bal, M. (1996). Double exposure: The subject of cultural analysis. New York: Routledge.
7. Ball, M. S., & Smith, G. W. H. (1992). Analyzing visual data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage.
9. Barrett, T. (2000). Criticizing art: Understanding the contemporary (2nd ed.). Mountain View CA: Mayfield.
10. Barthes, R. (1968). The elements of semiology (A. Lavers and C. Smith, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.
11. Beittel, K. R. (1979). Unity of truth, language, and method in art education. Studies in Art Education, 21(1), 50-56.
12. Berger, J. (1980). About looking. New York: Pantheon Books.
13. Bresler, L. (1994). Zooming in on the qualitative paradigm in art education: Educational criticism, ethnography, and action research. Visual Arts Research, 20(1), 1-19.
14. Brockman, J. (1996). The third culture: Beyond the scientific revolution. Touchstone: Simon & Schuster.
15. Brown, T., & Jones L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
16. Brown, M., & Korzenik, D. (1993). Art making and education. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
17. Brown, N. (2003). Art as a practice of research. Proceedings of the 31st InSEA World Congress: InSEA Member Presentations Papers and Workshops CD-ROM. New York: The Center for International Art Education, Inc., Teachers College Columbia University.
18. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts ofmeaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Bullough, R. V., Jr., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study. EducationalResearcher, 30(3), 13-21.
21. Carey, S., & Gelman, R. (Eds.). (1991). The epigenesis of mind: Essays in biology and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Carrier, D. (2003). Writing about visual art. New York: Allworth Press.
23. Chalmers, F. G. (1981). Art education as ethnology. Studies in Art Education, 22(3), 6-14.
24. Chadwick, W. (1990). Women, art, and society. London: Thames and Hudson.
25. Changeux, J. (1994). Art and neuroscience. Leonardo, 27(3), 189-201.
26. Cizek, G. (1995). Crunchy granola and the hegemony of the narrative. Educational Researcher, 24(2), 26-28.
27. nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
29. Danto, A. C. (1986). The philosophical disenfranchisement of art. New York: Columbia University Press.
30. Danto, A. C. (2001, May 28). In the bosom of Jesus. The Nation, 30-34.
31. Duncum, P., & Bracy, T. (Eds.). (2001). On knowing: Art and visual culture. Christchurch, NZ; Canterbury University Press.
32. Ecker, D. W. (1965). Editorial: On the possibility of theory in art. Studies in Art Education, 6(2), 1-6.
33. Efland, A. D. (1964). Theory and research in art education. Studies in Art Education, 6(1), 8-13.
34. Efland, A. D. (1990). A history of art education. Intellectual and social currents in teaching the visual arts. New York: Teachers College Press.
35. Efland, A. D. (1995). The spiral and the lattice: Changes in cognitive learning theory with implications for art education.Studies in Art Education, 36(3), 134-153.
36. Efland, A. D. (2002). Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press and Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
37. Eisner, E. W. (1964). Toward a new era in art education. Studies in Art Education, 6(2), 54-62.
38. Eisner, E. W. (1985). The art of educational evaluation: A personal view. London: The Falmer Press.
39. Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
40. Eisner, E. W. (1993). Forms of understanding and the future of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(7), 5-11.
41. Eisner, E. W. (1999). Rejoinder: A response to Tom Knapp. Educational Researcher, 28(1), 19-20.
42. Ellis, C., & Flaherty, M. G. (Eds.). (1992). Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Emmison, M., & Smith, P. (2000). Researching the visual: Images, objects, contexts, and interactions in social and cultural inquiry. London: Sage.
44. Feyerabend, P. (1991). Three dialogues on knowledge. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
45. Fielding, N. G., & Lee, R. M. (1998). Computer analysis and qualitative research. London: Sage.
46. Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
47. Frith, C., & Law, J. (1995). Cognitive and psychological processes underlying drawing skills. Leonardo, 28(3), 203-205.
48. Gahan, C., & Hannibal, M. (1998). Doing qualitative research using QSR NUD*IST. London: Sage.
49. Gardner H. (1973). The arts and human development. New York: Wiley.
50. Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind and brain: A cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic Books.
51. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
52. Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
53. Goodman, N. (1984). Of mind and other matters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Gross, P., & Levitt, N. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
55. Gruber, H. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Volume 1, Reason and the rationalization of society(T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
57. Harris, I. B. (1990). The creative process from the perspective of artists. Arts and Learning Research, 8(1), 163-188.
58. Harris, J. D. (1998). The nurture assumption. New York: Touchstone: Simon & Schuster.
59. Harris, J. H. (2001). The new art history: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.
60. Heywood, I., & Sandywell, B. (Eds.) (1999). Interpreting visual culture: Explorations in the hermeneutics of the visual. New York: Routledge.
61. Hine, C. (2001). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
62. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
63. Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the interpretation of visual culture. New York: Routledge.
64. Hubbard, G. (1963). The development of the visual arts in the curriculum of American colleges and universities. Dissertation Abstracts International. (University Microfilms No. 63-4607).
65. Irwin, R., & Miller, L. (1997). Oral history as community-based participatory research: Learning from First Nations women artists. Journal of Multicultural and Cross-Cultural Research in Art Education, 15, 10-22.
66. Jackson, P. (1990). The functions of educational research. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 3-9.
67. Kaufman, I. (1959). Some reflections on research in art education. Studies in Art Education, 1(1), 9-18.
68. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.
69. Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. New bury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
70. Krug, D. (1992/3). The expressive and cultural practices of a non-academically educated artist, Ellis Nelson, in the micro and macro environment. Journal of Multicultural and Cross-Cultural Research in Art Education, 10/11, 20-48.
71. LaChapelle, J. R. (1991). In the night studio: The professional artist as an educational role model. Studies in Art Education, 32(3), 160-170.
72. Lankford, E. L. (1992). Aesthetics: Issues and inquiry. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
73. LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31-60.
74. Light, P., & Butterworth, G. (Eds.). (1993). Context and Cognition: Ways of learning and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75. May, W. T. (1993). "Teachers-as-researchers" or action research: What is it, and what good is it for art education? Studies in Art Education, 34(2), 114-126.
76. McTaggart, R. (Ed.). (1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
77. Miller, D. (Ed.). (1985). Popper selections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78. Minor, V. H. (1994). Art history's history. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
79. Mithaug, D. E. (2000). Learning to theorize. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
80. Montgomery-Whicher, R. (1997). Drawing from life: The practice of art and research. N.S.C.A.D. papers beyond form: Transformation through imagery and action. Nova Scotia, Canada: Nova Scotia College of Art and Design.
81. Nadaner, D. (1998). Painting in the era of critical theory. Studies in Art Education, 39(2), 168-182.
82. Nochlin, L. (1988). Women, art, and power and other essays. New York: Harper & Row.
83. Parsons, M. (1992). Cognition as interpretation in art education. In B. Reimer & R. Smith (Eds.), The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing. Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
84. Parsons, M. (1995). Art and culture, visual and verbal thinking: Where are the bridges? Australian Art Education, 18(1), 7-14.
85. Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools. New York: Basic Books.
86. Perkins, D. (2000). The Eureka effect: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking. New York: Norton.
87. Pink, S. (2001). Visual ethnography. London: Sage.
88. Prosser, J. (1998). Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: Falmer Press.
89. Reed-Danahay, D. E. (Ed.). (1997). Auto/Ethnography. New York: Berg.
90. Ricreur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action, and interpretation (J. B. Thompson, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
91. Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
92. Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies. London: Sage.
93. Salomon, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative-quantitative debate: The analytic and systematic approaches to educational research. Educational Researcher, 20(6), 10-18.
94. Sacca, E. (1989). Typologies in art education: How to live with the m and how to live with out them. Visual Art Research, 15(2), 58-70.
95. Scheurich J. L. (1997). Research method in the postmodern. London: Falmer Press.
96. Singerman, H. (1999). Art subjects: Making artists in the American university. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
97. Smith, J. K., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-12.
98. Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99. Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1994). Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
100. Stokrocki, M. (1997). Qualitative forms of research methods. In S. D. La Pierre & E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Research methodologies for art education (pp. 33-55). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
101. Stronach, I., & MacLure, M. (1997). Educational research undone: The postmodern embrace. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
102. Stuhr, P., & Freedman, K. (1989). A field study of two prominent and successful fine artists. Arts and Learning Research, 7(1), 38-51.
103. Sullivan, G. (1986). A covariance structure model of symbolic functioning: A study of children's cognitive style, drawing, clay modelling and storytelling. Visual Arts Research, 12(1), 11-32.
104. Sullivan, G. (1993). Art-based art education: Learning that is meaningful, authentic, critical and pluralist. Studies in Art Education, 35(1), 5-21.
105. Sullivan, G. (1996). Critical interpretive inquiry: A qualitative study of five contemporary artists' ways of seeing. Studies in Art Education, 37(4), 210-225.
106. Sullivan, G. (1998). Critical influence: A visual arts research project with Jayne Dyer and Nikki McCarthy. CD-ROM, College of Fine Arts, University of New South Wales.
107. Sullivan, G. (2002a). Ideas and teaching: Making meaning from contemporary art. In Y. Gaudelius & P. Speirs (Eds.), Contemporary issues in art education (pp. 23-38). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
108. Sullivan, G. (2002b). Artistic thinking as transcognitive practice: A reconciliation of the process-product dichotomy. Visual Arts Research, 22(1), 2-17.
109. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
110. Taylor, C. (1989). The work of art as hermeneutic process: An artist "takes on" Heidegger. Visual Arts Research, 15(2), 52-57.
111. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Basingstoke, Hampshire: The Falmer Press.
112. Van Leeuwen, T., & Jewitt, C. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of visual analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
113. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
114. Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.
115. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social transformation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
116. West, T. G. (1997). In the mind's eye. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
117. Winner, E. (1982). Invented worlds: The psychology of the arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
118. Young, J. O. (2001). Art and knowledge. London: Routledge.
119. Zurmuehlen, M. (1990). Studio art: Praxis, symbol, presence. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.