Measuring the impact of teacher professional development: Can it be done?

European Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 25, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 119-134

  Flecknoe, Mervyn ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29244448164     PISSN: 02619768     EISSN: 14695928     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0261976022000035665     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. CHAMBERLIN, R., WRAGG, E., HAYNES, G., and WRAGG, C., Head teachers' perceptions of Threshold Assessment. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association. Leeds.
2. COPE, P., and INGLIS, B., 1992. The value of in-service degrees: teachers' long-term perceptions of their impact. British Educational Research Journal, 18: 297–308.
3. DILL, D., 1999. Academic accountability and university adaptation: the architecture of an academic learning organization. Higher Education, 38: 127–154.
4. EASTERBY SMITH, M., 1995. Evaluating management development training and education, London: Gower.
5. ECCLESTONE, K., 1999. Empowering or ensnaring? the implications of outcome-based assessment in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 53: 29–48.
6. FLECKNOE, M., and SAEIDI, S., Teacher as inquiring professional: does this help the children raise their game?. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.
7. GRAHAM, J., and NABB, J., 1999. Stakeholder Satisfaction: survey of Ofsted Inspection of ITT 1994-9, London: Universities Council for the Education of Teachers.
8. GRAY, J., HOPKINS, D., REYNOLDS, D., WILCOX, B., FARRELL, S., and JESSON, D., 1999. Improving schools: performance and potential, 1st edn, Buckingham: OUP.
9. GUBA, E., and LINCOLN, Y., 1989. Fourth generation evaluation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. HAYNES, G., WRAGG, E., WRAGG, C., and CHAMBERLIN, R., Threshold Assessment: The Experiences and Views of Teachers. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association. Leeds.
11. JULNES, G., MARK, M., and HENRY, G., 1998. Promoting realism in evaluation: realistic evaluation and the broader context. Evaluation, 4: 483–504.
12. MILLS, M., and HYLE, A., 1999. Faculty evaluation; a prickly pair. Higher Education, 38: 351–371.
13. MORTIMORE, P., SAMMONS, P., STOLL, L., LEWIS, D., and ECOB, R., 1988. School Matters: the junior years, London: Paul Chapman Education.
14. NELSON, C., and WATT, S., 1999. Academic Key Words: a devil's dictionary of higher education, London: Routledge.
15. OFSTED. 1999. Inspection of TTA-funded Inset, London: OFSTED.
16. PATTON, M.Q., 1997. Utilization-focused Evaluation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17. PAWSON, R., 1997. Realistic Evaluation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. QAA. 1999. Higher Quality, vol. 6, 25London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. No. 6
19. REA, D., Achievement motivation as a dynamical system: dancing on the edge of chaos with serious fun. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
20. REA, D., and AMBROSE, D., A 'conceptual continuum' for facilitating complex education: teaching and learning on the edge of chaos. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.
21. RUTTER, M., MAUGHAN, B., MORTIMORE, P., and OUSTON, J., 1979. Fifteen Thousand Hours: secondary schools and their effects on children, London: Open Books.
22. TTA. 2000. Principles and criteria for the second interim bidding round for TTA inset funding, London: Teacher Training Agency.