Measuring rehabilitation research capacity: Report from the AAPM&R Research Advisory Committee

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 84, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 955-968

  Wagner, Amy K ^a   McElligott, Jacinta ^c   Wagner II, Eugene P ^b   Gerber, Lynn H ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c The National Rehabilitation Hospital   (Ireland)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^e NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Metrics; Rehabilitation; Research Capacity; Research Environment; Researchers; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSICIAN; REHABILITATION RESEARCH; TAXONOMY;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; AGE DISTRIBUTION; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EFFICIENCY; EMPLOYMENT; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEMALE; FINANCING, ORGANIZED; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REHABILITATION; RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SEX DISTRIBUTION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 29244442700     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000187860.11221.8c     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Clinical Research Roundtable Homepage. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/ crr. Accessed July 15, 2005
2. Nathan DG: Clinical research: perceptions, reality, and proposed solutions. National Institute of Health director's panel on clinical research. JAMA 1998;280:1442-4
3. Kelley WN, Randolph MA, eds: Career in clinical research: 'Obstacles and Opportunities.' Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press; 1994
4. Jones RF, Gold J: The present and future appointment, tenure and compensation policies for medical school clinical faculty. Acad Med 2001;76:933-1004
5. Swick HM: Academic medicine must deal with the clash of business and professional values. Acad Med 1998;73:751-5
6. Buckley LM, Sanders K, Shih M, et al: MMS attitudes of clinical faculty about career progress, career success and recognition, and commitment to academic medicine: results of a survey. Buckley Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2625-2629
7. Bickel J, Wara D, Atkinson B, et al: Increasing women's leadership in academic medicine: report of the AAMC Project Implementation Committee. Acad Med 2002;77:1043-61
8. Bickel J, Clark V, Yamagata H, et al: Association of American Medical Colleges. Women in academic medicine. JAMA 2000;55:10-2, 19
9. Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL, et al: Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. JAMA 1995;274:1133-4
10. Wong EY, Cardenas DD: Women in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil 2001;12:1-7
11. Pinn V: The role of the NIH's Office of Research on Women's Health. Acad Med 1994;69:698-702
12. Schroen AT, Brownstein MR, Sheldon GF: Women in academic general surgery. Acad Med 2004;79:310-8
13. Palepu A, Friedman RH, Barnett RC, et al: Junior faculty members mentoring relationships and their professional development in US medical schools. Acad Med 1998;73:318-23
14. Dresler CM, Padgett DL, Mackinnon SE, et al: Experiences of women in cardiothoracic surgery. Arch Surg 1996;131:1128-34
15. Webster JB, Parker JC, Moore DP, et al: Research activities and perspectives of individuals completing a research enrichment program for physiatrists. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:403-9
16. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine: Faculty survey; 1999
17. University of Washington School of Medicine: Faculty survey; 1997
18. University of North Carolina Chapel Hill: Faculty survey. National Survey of Practicing General Surgeons
19. East Carolina University: Survey of faculty tenure policy knowledge
20. American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Membership and learning needs assessment survey
21. University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine: Faculty questionnaire
22. AAMC: Women in US survey of individual, institutional, and leadership factors affecting faculty productivity and morale
23. Hilton C, Fisher W, Lopez A, et al: A relative value-based system for calculating faculty productivity in teaching, research, administration, and patient care. Acad Med 1997;72:787-93
24. Bland C, Ruffin MT: Characteristics of a productive research environment. Literature Review 1992;67:385-95
25. Verville R DeLisa JA: Evolution of National Institutes of Health options for rehabilitation research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:565-79