The limits of demographic categories and the politics of the 2004 presidential election

Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 153-163

  Unger, Rhoda ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHIC TREND; ELECTION; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 29244433521     PISSN: 15297489     EISSN: 15302415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00061.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cole, E. R., & Luna, Z. T. (2005, February 26). Intersectionality : From political action to theory. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Women in Psychology, Tampa, FL.
2. Coryn, C. L., Beale, J. M., & Myers, K. M. (2004). Responses to September 11: Anxiety, patriotism, and prejudice in the aftermath of terror. Current Research in Social Psychology, 9, np.
3. Djube, P. A. (2000). Religious brand loyalties and political loyalties. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39, 78-89.
4. Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Koenig, A. M. (2004). Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 796-816,
5. Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Schneider, M. C., &Kulesa, P. (2003). Experimental tests of an attitudinal theory of the gender gap in voting. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1245-1258.
6. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
7. Kim, P. H. (2004). Conditional morality? Attitudes of religious individuals toward racial profiling. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 879-895.
8. Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., Miller, C. H., Ogilvie, D. M., & Cook, A. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136-1150.
9. Manza, J., & Brooks, C. (1998). The gender gap in U. S. presidential elections: When? Why? Implications? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1235-1266.
10. Silver, R. C., Hoffman, E. A., McIntosh, D. N., Poulin, M., & Gil-Rivas, V. (2002). Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 1235-1244.
11. Unger, R. K. (1984-1985). Explorations in feminist ideology: Surprising consistencies and unexamined conflicts. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 4, 387-405.
12. Unger, R. K. (2002). Them and us: Hidden ideologies - differences in degree or kind? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2, 43-52.
13. Unger, R. K., & Lemay, M. (1991). Who's to blame? The relationship between political attributions and assumptions about reality. Contemporary Social Psychology, 15, 144-149.
14. Unger, R. K., & Locher, P. (in press). Them and Us: The influence of hidden ideologies on students' reactions to September 11, 2001. Peace and Conflict.
15. Wilson, M. J. (1999). Group identity and political behavior in the United States. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, Duke University.