Spatial continuity of tree attributes in bottomland hardwood forests in the Southeastern United States

Forest Science

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 532-540

  Dimov, Luben D ^a   Chambers, Jim L ^a   Lockhart, Brian Roy ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR BOTTOMLAND HARDWOODS RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross variogram; Geostatistics; Spatial dependence; Variogram

Indexed keywords

HARDWOODS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; VEGETATION;

CROSS-VARIOGRAM; GEOSTATISTICS; SPATIAL DEPENDANCE; VORIOGRAM;

FORESTRY;

FORESTRY; HARDWOODS; PLANTS; SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT;

EID: 29144521791     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ASSMANN, E. 1970. The principles of forest yield study - Studies in the organic production, silviculture, increment and yield of forest stands.
2. [Translation from Assmann, E. 1961. Walderertragskunde. BLV Bayerischer Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH, München, Federal Republic of Germany.] Pergamon Press, Oxford. 506 p.
3. BARTELINK, H.H. 1997. Allometric relationships for biomass and leaf area of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ann. Sci. Forest. 54:39-50.
4. BEKELE, A. 2001. Spatial variability and isotropic studies of the prairie-forest transition soil in Louisiana. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Agronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 189 p.
5. BIONDI, F., D.E. MYERS, AND C.C. AVERY. 1994. Geostatistically modeling stem size and increment in an old-growth forest. Can. J. For. Res. 24:1354-1368.
6. BRINGMARK, E. 1989. Spatial variation in soil pH of beech forests in relation to buffering properties and soil depths. Oikos 54:165-177.
7. CHEN, J., B. SONG, M. RUDNICKI, M. MOEUR, K. BIBLE, M. NORTH, D.C. SHAW, J.F. FRANKLIN, AND D.M. BRAUN. 2004. Spatial relationship of biomass and species distribution in an old-growth Pseudotsuga-Tsuga forest. For. Sci. 50:364-375.
8. COHEN, W.B., T.A. SPIES, AND G.A. BRADSHAW. 1990. Semivariograms of digital imagery for analysis of conifer canopy structure. Remote Sens. Environ. 34:167-168.
9. CRESSIE, N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 900 p.
10. DALE, M.R.T. 2000. Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 326 p.
11. GOOVAERTS, P. 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York. 483 p.
12. GRUSHECKY, S.T., AND M.A. FAJVAN. 1999. Comparison of hardwood stand structure after partial harvesting using intensive canopy maps and geostatistical techniques. For. Ecol. Manage. 114:421-432.
13. HARPER, J.L. 1977. The effects of neighbors. P. 151-347 in Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom. 892 p.
14. HIBBS, D.E. 1981. Development of the forest canopy - A key to silviculture. Northern Logger and Timber Processor 29:62-78.
15. HIBBS, D.E. 1983. Forty years of forest succession in central New England. Ecology 64:1394-1401.
16. HODGES, J.D. 1997. Development and ecology of bottomland hardwood sites. For. Ecol. Manage. 90:117-125.
17. HODGES, J.D., AND G.L. SWITZEL. 1979. Some aspects of the ecology of southern bottomland hardwoods. In Proceedings of Conference of the Society of American Forestry, 22-26 October 1978. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 22-25.
18. HYPPANEN, H. 1996. Spatial autocorrelation and optimal spatial resolution of optical remote sensing data in boreal forest environment. Int. J. Remote Sens. 17:3441-3452.
19. ISAAKS, E.H., AND R.M. SRIVASTAVA. 1989. Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York. 561 p.
20. JOURNEL, A.G., AND C.J. HUIJBREGTS. 1978. Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom. 600 p.
21. KINT, V., M.V. MEIRVENNE, L. NACHTERGALE, G. GEUDENS, AND N. LUST. 2003. Spatial methods for quantifying forest stand structure and development: A comparison between nearest-neighbor indices and variogram analysis. For. Sci. 49:36-49.
22. KRAFT, G. 1884. Beiträge z. Lehre v. d. Durchforstungen usw. (Hanover). (As cited by Assmann 1970).
23. KUULUVAINEN, T. 1991. Relationships between crown projected area and components of aboveground biomass in Norway spruce trees in even-aged stands - Empirical results and their interpretation. For. Ecol. Manage. 40:243-260.
24. LECHOWICZ, M.J., AND G. BELL. 1991. The ecology and genetics of fitness in forest plants. II. Microspatial heterogeneity of the edaphic environment. J. Ecol. 79:687-696.
25. LIEBHOLD, A.M., R.E. ROSSI, AND W.P. KEMP. 1993. Geostatistics and geographic information systems in applied insect ecology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 38:303-327.
26. MEADOWS, J.S., AND J.C.G. GOELZ. 1998. First-year growth and bole quality responses to thinning in a red oak-sweetgum stand on a minor streambottom site. P. 188-193 in Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-20, Waldrop, T.A. (ed.). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.
27. MEADOWS, J.S. AND J.C.G. GOELZ. 2002. Fourth-year effects of thinning on growth and epicormic branching in a red oak-sweetgum stand on a minor streambottom site in west-central Alabama. P. 201-208 in Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-48, Outcalt, K.W. (ed.). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.
28. MEKO, D., E.R. COOK, D.W. STAHLE, C.W. STOCKTO, AND M.K. HUGHES. 1993. Spatial patterns of tree-growth anomalies in the United States and southeastern Canada. J. Climate 6:1773-1786.
29. NANOS, N., S.C. GONZÁLES-MARTÍNEZ, AND F. BRAVO. 2004. Studying within-stand structure and dynamics with geostatistical and molecular marker tools. For. Ecol. Manage. 189:223-240.
30. OLIVER, C.D. 1978a. Even-aged development of mixed-species stands. J. For. 78:201-203.
31. OLIVER, C.D. 1978b. The development of northern red oak in mixed stands in central New England. Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin 91. 63 p.
32. OLIVER, C.D. 1980. Even aged development of mixed-species stands. J. For. 78:201-203.
33. ROSSI, R.E., D.J. MULLA, A.G. JOURNEL, AND E.H. FRANZ. 1992. Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological and spatial dependence. Ecol. Monogr. 62:277-314.
34. SMITH, D.M., B.C. LARSON, M.J. KELTY, AND P.M.S. ASHTON. 1997. The practice of silviculture - Applied forest ecology, 9th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 537 p.
35. YODA, K., T. KIARA, AND K. HOZUMI. 1957. Intraspecific competition among higher plants. IX. Further analysis of the competitive interaction between adjacent individuals. Journal of the Institute of Polytechnics, Osaka City University. 8:161-178. (Cited by Harper 1977).