Studying within-stand structure and dynamics with geostatistical and molecular marker tools

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 189, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 223-240

  Nanos, Nikos ^a   González Martínez, Santiago C ^b   Bravo, Felipe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^b INIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Competition; Geostatistics; Molecular markers; Spatial structure; Stand dynamics

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; CORRELATION METHODS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; PRODUCTIVITY;

NATURAL REGENERATION; SPATIAL AGGREGATION;

ECOLOGY;

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); GENETIC MARKER; GEOSTATISTICS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STAND DYNAMICS; STAND STRUCTURE;

CASTILLA Y LEON; EURASIA; EUROPE; SEGOVIA [CASTILLA Y LEON]; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

PINUS PINASTER;

EID: 1242300165     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.08.016     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Biging G.S., Dobbertin M. A comparison of distance-dependent competition measures for height and basal area growth of individual conifer trees. For. Sci. 38(3):1992;695-720.
2. Biging G.S., Dobbertin M. Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models. For. Sci. 41:1995;360-377.
3. Biondi F., Myers D.E., Avery C.C. Geostatistically modeling stem size and increment in an old growth forest. Can. J. For. Res. 24:1994;1354-1368.
4. Bravo F., Hann D., Maguire D.A. Impact of competitor species composition on predicting diameter growth and survival rates of Douglas-fir in southwest Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 31:2001;2237-2247.
5. Cao Q.V. Prediction of annual diameter growth and survival for individual trees from periodic measurements. For. Sci. 46:2000;127-131.
6. Chilés, J.P., Delfiner, P., 1999. Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New York, 695 pp.
7. Costa P., Durel C.E. Time trends in genetic control over height and diameter in maritime pine. Can. J. For. Res. 26:1996;1209-1217.
8. Davis M.A., Wrage K.J., Reich P.B. Competition between tree seedlings and herbaceous vegetation: support for a theory of resource supply and demand. J. Ecol. 86:1998;652-661.
9. Dellaporta S.L., Wood J., Hicks J.B. A plant DNA minipreparation, Version II. Plant. Mol. Biol. Rep. 1:1983;19-21.
10. Epperson B.K. Spatial structure of genetic variation within populations of forest trees. New For. 6:1992;241-256.
11. Epperson B.K., Allard R.W. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of the distribution of genotypes within populations of lodgepole pine. Genetics. 121:1989;369-377.
12. Fu Y., Yanchuk A.D., Namkoong G. Spatial patterns of tree height variations in a series of Douglas-fir progeny trial: implications for genetic testing. Can. J. For. Res. 29:1999;714-723.
13. González-Martínez S.C., Gerber S., Cervera M.T., Martínez-Zapater J.M., Gil L., Alía R. Seed gene flow and fine-scale structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) using nuclear microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104:2002;1290-1297.
14. Goovaerts, P., 1997. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Applied Geostatistics Series. Oxford University Press, New York.
15. Gunnarsson F., Holm S., Holmgren P., Thuresson T. On the potential of kriging for forest management planning. Scand. J. For. Res. 13(2):1998;237-245.
16. Hamann A., Koshy M.P., Namkoong G., Ying C.C. Genotype×environment interactions in Alnus rubra: developing seed zones and seed-transfer guidelines with spatial statistics and GIS For. Ecol. Manage. 136:2000;107-119.
17. Hann, D.W., Wang, C.H., 1990. Mortality equations for individual trees in the mixed-conifer zone of southwest Oregon. Research Bulletin 67. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
18. Hegyi, F., 1974. A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands. In: Fries, F. (Ed.), Growth Models for Tree and Stand Simulation. Royal Coll. of For., Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 74-90.
19. Higgins S.I., Richardson D.M. Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: the role of long-distance dispersal. Am. Nat. 153:1999;464-475.
20. Hock B.K., Payn T.W., Shirley J.W. Using a geographic information system and geostatistics to estimate site index of Pinus radiata for Kaingaroa Forest, New Zealand. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 23(3):1993;264-277.
21. Holmgren P., Thuresson T. Applying objectively estimated and spatially continuous forest parameters in tactical planning to obtain dynamic treatment units. For. Sci. 43(3):1997;317-326.
22. Isaaks, E.H., Srivastava, R.M., 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, 561 pp.
23. Kusnandar D., Galwey N.W., Hertzler G.L., Butcher T.B. Age trends in variances and heritabilities for diameter and height in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Western Australia. Silvae Genet. 47:1998;136-141.
24. Kuuluvainen T., Hokkanen T.J., Järvinen E., Pukkala T. Factors related to seedling growth in a boreal Scots pine stand: a spatial analysis of a vegetation-soil system. Can. J. For. Res. 23:1993;2101-2109.
25. Levin D.A., Kerster H.W. Gene flow in seed plants. Evol. Biol. 7:1974;139-220.
26. Linhart Y.B., Mitton J.B., Sturgeon K.B., Davis M.L. Genetic variation in space and time in a population of ponderosa pine. Heredity. 46:1981;407-426.
27. Mandallaz D. Estimation of the spatial covariance in universal kriging: application to forest inventory. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 7:2000;263-284.
28. Miguel I., González-Martínez S.C., Alía R., Gil L. Growth phenology and mating system of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in central Spain. Invest. Agric.: Sist. Recur. For. 11:2002;193-204.
29. Moeur M. Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stem-mapped data. For. Sci. 39(4):1993;756-775.
30. Monserud R.A., Sterba H. Modeling individual tree mortality for Austrian forest species. For. Ecol. Manage. 113:1999;109-123.
31. Nanos N., Montero G. Spatial prediction of diameter distribution models. For. Ecol. Manage. 161:2002;147-158.
32. Nanos N., Tadesse W., Montero G., Gil L., Alía R. Spatial stochastic modelling of resin yield from pine stands. Can. J. For. Res. 31(7):2001;1140-1147.
33. Samra J.S., Gill H.S., Bhatia V.K. Spatial stochastic modeling of growth and forest resource evaluation. For. Sci. 35(3):1989;663-676.
34. Samra J.S., Richter J., Gill H.S., Anlauf R. Spatial dependence of soil sodicity and tree growth in a Natric Haplustalf. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54(5):1990;1228-1233.
35. Streiff R., Labbe T., Bacilieri R., Steinkellner H., Glössl J., Kremer A. Within-population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 7:1998;317-328.
36. Szwagrzyk J. Small-scale spatial patterns of trees in a mixed Pinus sylvestris-Fagus sylvatica forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 51:1992;301-315.
37. Szwagrzyk J., Czerwczak M. Spatial patterns of trees in natural forests of East-Central Europe. J. Veg. Sci. 4(4):1993;469-476.
38. Tomé M., Burkhart H.E. Distance-dependent competition measures for predicting growth of individual trees. For. Sci. 35(3):1989;816-831.
39. Vanclay, J.K., 1994. Modelling Forest Growth and Yield: Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests. CAB International, Wallingford, 312 pp.
40. Weiner J. Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5(11):1990;360-364.
41. West P.W. Inter-tree competition and small-scale pattern in monoculture of Pinus radiata D. Don. Oecologia. 81:1984;57-61.
42. Wykoff, W.R., Crookston, N.L., Stage, A.R., 1982. User's Guide to the Stand Prognosis Model. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-133.
43. Yazdani R., Lindgren D., Stewart S. Gene dispersion within a population of Pinus sylvestris. Scand. J. For. Res. 4:1989;295-306.
44. Zeide B. Thinning and growth: a full turnaround. J. For. 99(1):2001;20-25.