Recurrent representation reinterpreted

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-04-03, Issue , 2004, Pages 40-43

  Landy, David ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RECURRENT REPRESENTATION; SIMPLE RECURRENT NETWORKS (SRNS);

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; FUNCTION EVALUATION; RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 29144491126     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Aydede, M. 1997. Language of thought: The connectionist contribution. Minds and Machines 7:57-101.
2. Davies, P. 1991. Concepts, connectionism, and the language of thought. In William Ramsey, Stephen Stich, D. R., ed., Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Desai, R. 2002a. Bootstrapping in miniature language acquisition. Cognitive Systems Research 3(1):15-23.
4. th Annual Conference of the Chicago Linguistic Society.
5. Elman, J. 1990. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14:179-211.
6. Elman, J. L. 1995. Language as a dynamical system. In Port, R. F., and Van Gelder, T., eds., Mind as Motion:Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. MIT Press. 195-223.
7. Fodor, J., and Lepore, E. 2002. Why meaning (probably) isn't conceptual role. In The Compositionality Papers. Oxford University Press.
8. Fodor, J. 1987. Psychosemantics. MIT Press.
9. Haugeland, J. 1985. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. MIT Press.
10. Horwich, P. 1997. The composition of meanings. The Philosophical Review 106(4):503-532.
11. Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. MIT Press.
12. Markman, A. B., and Dietrich, E. 2000. Extending the classical view of representation. Trends in Cognitive Science 4(12):470-475.
13. Rodriguez, P.; Wiles, J.; and Elman, J. 1999. A recurrent neural network that learns to count. Connection Science 11(1):5-40.
14. Tabor, W., and Tanenhaus, M. K. 1999. Dynamical models of sentence processing. Cognitive Science 23(4):491-515.
15. Van Gelder, T. 1995. What might cognition be, if not computation? Journal of Philosophy 91:345-381.
16. Zadrozny, W. 1994. From compositional to systematic semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 17:329-342.