Performance management analysis: A case study at a Dutch municipality

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 26-39

  De Waal, A A ^a   Gerritsen Medema, G ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (Netherlands)

^b Municipality Lelystad   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Behaviour; Government; Performance management; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144487205     PISSN: 17410401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17410400610635480     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bauer, J., Tanner, S.J. and Neely, A. (2004), "Benchmarking performance measurement: a consortium benchmarking study", in Neely, A., Kennerly, M. and Waters, A. (Eds), Performance Measurement and Management: Public and Private, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University, Cranfield, pp. 1021-8.
2. Boorsma, P.B. (2001), Modern Public Management, in Theory and Practice, With Special Reference to The Netherlands, Department for Public Administration, Twente University, Enschede.
3. Davis, S. and Albright, T. (2004), "An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance", Management Accounting Research, Vol. 15, pp. 135-53.
4. de Waal, A.A. (2001), Power of Performance Management: How Leading Companies Create Sustained Value, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
5. de Waal, A.A. (2004), "Stimulating performance-driven behaviour to obtain better results", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, July.
6. de Waal, A.A., Radnor, Z.J. and Akhmetova, D. (2004), "Performance-driven behavior: a cross-country comparison", in Neely, A., Kennerly, M. and Waters, A. (Eds), Performance Measurement and Management: Public and Private, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University, Cranfield, pp. 299-306.
7. de Waal, A.A. and Kerklaan, L.A.F.M. (2004), "Performance management in the Dutch public sector: an overview and latest developments", in Neely, A., Kennerly, M. and Waters, A. (Eds), Performance Measurement and Management: Public and Private, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University, Cranfield, pp. 1063-70.
8. Dowson, L., Martin, S. and Sanderson, I. (2004), "Performance management in modern local government: improvement, evaluation and locality", in Neely, A., Kennerly, M. and Waters, A. (Eds), Performance Measurement and Management: Public and Private, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University, Cranfield.
9. Epstein, M.J. (2004), "The drivers and measures of success in high performance organizations", in Epstein, M.J. and Manzoni, J.F. (Eds), Performance Measurement and Management Control: Superior Organizational Performance, Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, 14, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 3-18.
10. Ho, S.J.K. and Chan, Y.C.L. (2002), "Performance measurement and the implementation of balanced scorecards in municipal governments", Journal of Government Financial Management, Vol. 51 No. 4.
11. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
12. Lipe, M.G. and Salterio, S.E. (2000), "The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures", Accounting Review, Vol. 75 No. 3, pp. 283-98.
13. Malina, M.A. and Selto, F.M. (2004), Choice and Change of Measures in Performance Measurement Models, working paper, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, June.
14. Marchand, D.A., Davenport, T.H. and Dickson, T. (2000), Mastering Information Management: Complete MBA Companion in Information Management, Prentice Hall Financial Times, Harlow.
15. Marr, B. (2004), Business Performance Management: Current State of the Art, Cranfield University, Cranfield and Hyperion, Santa Clara, CA.
16. Martins, R.A. (2000), "Use of performance measurement systems: some thoughts towards a comprehensive approach", in Neely, A. (Ed.), Performance Measurement - Past, Present, and Future, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University, Cranfield, pp. 363-70.
17. Merchant, K.A. (1998), Modern Management Control Systems: Text & Cases, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
18. Mihm, J.C. (2003), Creating a Clear Linkage Between Individual Performance and Organizational Success, FDCH Government Account Reports, 14 April.
19. Moriarty, P. and Kennedy, D. (2002), "Performance measurement in public sector services: problems and potential", in Neely, A., Walters, A. and Austin, R. (Eds), Performance Measurement and Management: Research and Action, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield.
20. Neely, A. (1998), Measuring Business Performance, Why, What and How, The Economist Books, London.
21. Neely, A. (Ed.) (2000), Performance Measurement - Past, Present, and Future, Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University, Cranfield.
22. Propper, C. and Wilson, D. (2003), The Use and Usefulness of Performance Measures in the Public Sector, CMPO Working Paper Series, No. 03/073 (May).
23. Said, A.A., HassabElnaby, H.R. and Weir, B. (2003), "An empirical investigation of the performance consequences of nonfinancial measures", Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 15, pp. 193-223.
24. Simons, R. (1995), Levers of Control: How Managers use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
25. Simons, R. (2000), Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy: Text & Cases, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
26. van Thiel, S. and Leeuw, F.L. (2002), "The performance paradox in the public sector", Public Performance & Review, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 267-81.