Equipos de trabajo y performance: Un análisis empírico a nivel de planta productiva

Management

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 111-134

  Galve Górriz, Carmen ^a   Ortega Lapiedra, Raquel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144482784     PISSN: 12864892     EISSN: 12864692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Adler, Paul S. y Robert E. Cole 1993 Designed for Learning: A Tale of Two Autoplants, Sloan Management Review, 34:3, 85-94.
2. Alderfer, Clayton P. 1977 Group and Intergroup Relations, en J. Richard Hackman y J. Lloyd Suttle (Eds), Improving Life at Work: Behavioral Science Approaches to Organizational Change, Santa Monica: Goodyear, 227-296.
3. Banker, Rajiv D., Joy M. Field, Roger G. Schroeder, y Kingshuk K. Sinha 1996 Impact of Work Teams on Manufacturing Performance: A Longitudinal Field Study, Academy of Management Journal, 39:4, 867-890.
4. Batt, Rosemary y Eileen Appelbaum 1995 Worker Participation in Diverse Settings: Does the Form Affect the Outcome, and if so, who Benefits?, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33:3, 353-378.
5. Bennett, David y Ulf Karlsson 1992 Work Organization as a Basis for Competition: The Transition of Car Assembly in Sweden, International Studies of Management & Organization, 22:4, 49-60.
6. Berggren, Christian 1992 Alternatives to Lean Production: Work Organization in the Swedish Auto Industry, Ithaca: ILR Press.
7. Campion, Michael A., Gina J. Medsker, y A. Catherine Higgs 1993 Relations between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups, Personnel Pyschology 46:4, 823-850.
8. Cohen, Susan G., Gerald E. Ledford, Jr. y Gretchen M. Spreitzer 1996 A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness, Human Relations, 49:5, 643-676.
9. Cohen, Susan G., y Diane E. Bailey 1997 What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite, Journal of Management, 23:3, 239-290.
10. Cordery, John L., Walter S. Mueller, y Leigh M. Smith 1991 Attitudinal and Behavioral Effects of Autonomous Group Working: A Longitudinal Field Study, Academy of Management Journal, 34:2, 464-476.
11. Cotton, John L. 1993 Employee Involvement: Methods for Improving Performance and Work Attitudes, Newbury Park: Sage.
12. Ellegard, Kevin, Theodore Engstrom, y Kjell Nilsson, 1991 Reforming Industrial Work: Principles and Realities in the Planning of Volvo's Car Assembly Plant in Udevalla, Stockholm, Stockholm: Swedish Work Environment Fund.
13. Guzzo, Richard A., y Marcus W. Dickson 1996 Teams in Organizations: Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness, in Mark R. Rosenzweig y Lyman W. Porter (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.
14. Hackman, J. Richard 1987 The Design of Work Teams, en Jay W Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 315-342.
15. Hackman, J. Richard 1991 Work Teams in Organizations: An Orienting Framework, en J. Richard Hackman (Ed.), Groups that Work (and Those that Don't), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1-14.
16. Hayes, Robert H., y Kim B. Clark 1985 Exploring the Sources of Productivity Differences At The Factory Level, en Kim B. Clark, Robert H. Hayes, y Christopher Lorenz (Eds), The Uneasy Alliance: Managing the Productivity-Technology Dilemma, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 151-188.
17. Levine David I., y Laura D. Tyson 1990 Participation, Productivity and the Firm's Environment, en Alan S. Blinder (Ed.), Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence, Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution, 183-243.
18. MacDuffie, John Paul 1995 Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in The World Auto Industry, Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 48:2, 197-221.
19. Maddala, G. S. 1996 Introductión a la Econometría, 2da ed., México: Prentice Hall Hispanoamericana.
20. Magjuka, Richard J., y Timothy T. Baldwin 1991 Team-Based Employee Involvement Programs: Effects of Design and Administration, Personnel Psychology, 44:4, 793-812.
21. Nieva, V. F., Edwin A Fleishman, y A. Reick 1985 Team Dimensions: Their Identity, their Measurement, and their Relationships, Research Note 85-12, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army. Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
22. Novales, Alfonso 1993 Econometría, 2da ed., Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
23. Pearson, Cecil A. L. 1992 Autonomous Workgroups: An Evaluation at an Industrial Site, Human Relations, 45:9, 905-936.
24. Regout, S. 1992 New Forms of Work Organization - A Typology, European Participation Monitor, 3, 31-34.
25. Roethlisberger, F. J., y William J. Dickson 1939 Management and the Worker: An Account of a Research Program Conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
26. Salas, Vicente 1993 Factores de Competitividad Empresarial: Consideraciones Generales, Papeles de Economía Española, 56:3, 379-401.
27. Schein, Edgar 1980 Psicología de la Organización, Madrid: Dosat.
28. Sundstrom, Eric, Kenneth P. DeMeuse, y David Futrell 1990 Work Teams: Aplications and Effectiveness, American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
29. Trist, Eric L., y Ken W. Bamforth 1951 Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting, Human Relations, 4:1, 3-38.
30. Trist, Eric L., George Higgin, Hugh Murray, y Albert Pollack 1963 Organizational Choice: Capabilities of Groups at the Coal Face under Changing Technologies: The Loss, Re-Discovery & Transformation of a Work Tradition, London: Tavistock Publications.
31. Vinokur-Kaplan, Diane 1995 Treatment Teams That Work (and Those That Don't): An Application of Hackman's Group Effectiveness Model to Interdisciplinary Teams in Psychiatric Hospitals, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31:3, 303-327.
32. Wageman, Ruth 1995 Interdependence and Group Effectiveness, Administrative Science Quaterly, 40:1, 145-180.
33. Wagner, John A., III 1994 Participation's Effect on Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration of Research Evidence, Academy of Management Review, 19:2, 312-330.