Guest editor's preface: Aid management: beyond the new orthodoxy

Public Administration and Development

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 365-371

  Hubbard, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT AID; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE;

EID: 29144456597     PISSN: 02712075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pad.372     Document Type: Editorial

References (38)

1. Adam C, Gunning J. 2002. Redesigning the aid contract: donors' use of performance indicators in Uganda. World Development 30(12):2045-2056.
2. Amis P, Green L, Hubbard M. 2005. Measuring aid costs: what has been learnt and what still needs to be learnt. Public Administration and Development [this issue].
3. Batholomew A, Lister S. 2005. The benefits of a strong consultative framework. Public Administration and Development [this issue].
4. Batley R. 2005. Mozambique: the costs of 'owning' aid. Public Administration and Development [this issue].
5. Brautigam D, Knack S. 2004. Foreign aid, institutions and governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Economic Development and Cultural Change, 255-285. Chicago: University of Chicago.
6. Brown A, Naschold F, Conway T, Fozzard A. 2000. Aid Transaction Costs in Vietnam. ODI: London, December.
7. Chauvet L, Collier P. 2005. Development effectiveness in fragile states: spillovers and turnarounds. Paper to OECD/DAC Senior Level Forum on Development Effectiveness in Fragile States, January 2005, London.
8. Chauvet L, Guillaumont P. 2004. Aid and growth revisited: policy, economic vulnerability and political instability. In Towards Propoor Policies, Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics, Tungoden B et al. (eds). World Bank/Oxford University press: Washington, DC/Oxford.
9. Collier P, Hoeffler A, Patillo C. 2004. Aid and Capital Flight. Centre for the Study of African Economies: Oxford.
10. Commission for Africa. 2005. Our common interest: report of the commission for Africa. www.commisionforafrica.org.
11. DAC. 2005a. Survey on harmonisation and alignment: progress in implementing harmonisation and alignment in 14 partner countries.
12. DAC. 2005b. Chair's summary: senior level forum on development effectiveness in fragile states, London: January 2005.
13. Delay A. 2005. Why does aid management in Samoa work? A note. Public Administration and Development [this issue].
14. Foster M, Leavy J. 2001. The choice of financial aid instruments' ODI working paper 158, Centre for aid and public expenditure. ODI: London.
15. Green L, Curtis D. 2005. Partnership or posture in aid for development? Public Administration and Development [this issue].
16. Godfrey M, Sphal C, Kato T, Piseth L, Dorina P, Saravy T, Savora T, Sovannarith S. 2002. Technical assistance and capacity development in an aid-dependent economy: the experience of Cambodia. World Development 30(3): 355-373.
17. Gunning J. 2000. The reform of aid: conditionality, selectivity and ownership. Paper to the conference 'Aid and Development' January 2000, Stockholm.
18. Helleiner G. 2000. Local ownership and donor performance monitoring: new aid relationships in Tanzania, in Cooperation South (UNDP) 2000, No.2, 'Towards balance in aid relationships: donor performance monitoring in low income developing countries'. www.capacity.org.
19. Hubbard M. 2004. The use of different aid instruments in Asia: synthesis report. Report to DFID.
20. Hubbard M. 2005. Aid management in Cambodia: breaking out of a low ownership trap. Public Administration and Development [this issue].
21. Killick T. 2001.Comments made at International Development Association (IDA) workshop, as reported in IDA (2001). Highlights from Workshop on the Future of Concessional Finance, February 2001.
22. Killick T. 2004. Policy, evidence and the new aid agenda. Development Policy Review 22(1): 5-29.
23. Knack S, Rahman A. 2004. Donor fragmentation and bureaucratic quality in aid recipients. World Bank Research Working Paper 3186, January.
24. Johnson J, Wasty SS. 1993. Borrower ownership of adjustment programs and the political economy of reform. World Bank, Washington DC, USA. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 199.
25. Leandro J, Schafer H, Frontini G. 1999. Towards a more effective conditionality: an operational framework. World Development 27(2): 285-299.
26. Leurs R. 2005. Aid disbursement delays: measures, causes, solutions. Public Administration and Development [this issue].
27. McGillivray M. 2004. 'Is aid effective?' WIDER: Helsinki.
28. Moore M. 2000. Political underdevelopment. Paper presented at the 10th anniversary conference of the Development Studies Institute, London School of Economics.
29. Morrissey O, Verschoor A. 2003. What does ownership mean in practice? Policy learning and the evaluation of pro-poor policy is in Uganda. Paper presented to DSA conference, Glasgow.
30. Nickson A. 2005. Bolivia: making government leadership in aid management work. Public Administration and Development [this issue].
31. OECD. 2003. Harmonising Donor Practices for Effective Aid Delivery. In DAC Guidelines and Reference Series. OECD: Paris.
32. Ostrom E, Gibson C, Shivakumar S, Andersson K. 2002. Aid, incentives and sustainability: an analysis of development cooperation. SIDA studies in the evaluation 02/01: Stockhholm.
33. Oxfam International. 2004. From 'donorship' to 'ownership'. Moving towards PRSP Round Two. Oxfam International: Oxford.
34. Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. 2005. High Level Forum, March 2005. Paris.
35. SPA. 2004. Budget Support Alignment with National Processes: Findings of the 2004 Survey. Strategic Partnership with Africa. World Bank: Washington.
36. Tarp F. 2000. Foreign Aid and Development. Routledge: London and New York.
37. Tshikata Y. 2001. Owning economic reforms: a comparative study of Ghana and Tanzania. WIDER Discussion Paper 2001/53.
38. World Bank. 2004. 2003 Annual Review of Development Effectiveness. Operations Evaluation Department. World Bank: Washington.