Self-controlled knowledge of results: Effects of different schedules and task complexity

Journal of Human Movement Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 277-296

  Chiviacowsky, S ^a   Godinho, M ^b   Tani, G ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Feedback; Motor learning; Self control; Task complexity; Timing

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144450684     PISSN: 03067297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. BANDURA, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84: 191-215.
2. BANDURA, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28: 117-148.
3. CARNAHAN, H., VANDERVOORT, A. A. AND SWANSON, L. R. (1996). The influence of summary knowledge of results and aging on motor learning. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 67: 280-287.
4. CHEN, D. AND SINGER, R. N. (1992). Self-regulation and cognitive strategies in sport participation. Int. J. Sport Psychol., 23: 277-300.
5. CHIVIACOWSKY, S. AND TANI, G. (1993). Efeitos da freqüência do conhecimento de resultados na aprendizagem de uma habilidade motora em crianças. Revista Paulista de Educação Física, 7: 45-57.
6. CHIVIACOWSKY, S. AND WULF, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 73: 408-415.
7. CHIVIACOWSKY, S. AND WULF, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 76: 42-48.
8. GABLE, C. D., SHEA, C. H. AND WRIGHT, D. L. (1991). Summary knowledge of results. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 62: 285-292.
9. GOODWIN, J. E. AND MEEUWSEN, H. J. (1995). Using bandwidth knowledge of results to alter relative frequencies during motor skill acquisition. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 66: 99-104.
10. GRAYDON, J., PAINE, L., ELLIS, C. AND THREADGOLD, R. (1997). Comparison of bandwidth knowledge of results and the relative frequency effect in learning a discrete motor skill. J. Hum. Movement Stud., 32: 15-28.
11. GUADAGNOLI, M. A., DORNIER, L. A. AND TANDY, R. D. (1996). Optimal length for summary knowledge of results: The influence of task-related experience and complexity. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 67: 239-248.
12. GUAY, M., SALMONI, A. AND LAJOIE, Y. (1997). Summary knowledge of results and task processing load. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 68: 167-171.
13. JANELLE, C. M., BARBA, D. A., FREHLICH, S. G., TENNANT, L. K. AND CAURAUGH, H. (1997). Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 68: 269-279.
14. JANELLE, C. M., KIM, J. AND SINGER, R. N. (1995). Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Percept. Motor Skills, 81: 627-634.
15. KOHL, R. AND GUADAGNOLI, M. A. (1996). The scheduling of knowledge of results. J. Motor Behav., 28: 233-240.
16. LAI, Q. AND SHEA, C. H. (1999). The role of reduced frequency of knowledge of results during constant practice. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 70: 33-40.
17. NEWELL, K. M. AND CORCOS, D. M. (1993). Issues in variability and motor control. In Variability and motor control. Human Kinetics, (Edited by K.M. Newell and D.M. Corcos), Champaign, IL, pp. 1-12.
18. REEVE, T. G., DORNIER, L. A. AND WEEKS, D. J. (1990). Precision of knowledge of results: Consideration of the accuracy requirements imposed by the task. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 61: 284-290.
19. SALMONI, A., SCHMIDT, R. A. AND WALTER, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95: 355-386.
20. SCHMIDT, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In Tutorials in motor neuroscience. Kluwer Academic (Edited by J. Requin and G.E. Stelmach), Netherlands, pp. 59-75.
21. SCHMIDT, R. A., YOUNG, D. E., SWINNEN, S. AND SHAPIRO, D. C. (1989). Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 62: 27-32.
22. SMITH, P. J., TAYLOR, S. J. AND WITHERS, K. (1997). Applying bandwidth feedback scheduling to a golf shot. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 68: 215-221
23. SPARROW, W. A. AND SUMMERS, J. J. (1992). Performance on trials without knowledge of results (KR) in reduced relative frequency presentations of KR. J. Motor Behav., 24: 197-209.
24. SWINNEN, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In Advances in motor learning and control. Human Kinetics, (Edited by H.N. Zelaznik), Champaign, IL., pp. 37-66.
25. WEEKS, D. J., ZELAZNIK, H. AND BEYAK, B. (1993). An empirical note on reduced frequency of knowledge of results. J. Hum. Movement Stud., 25: 193-201.
26. WEEKS, D. L. AND SHERWOOD, D. E. (1994). A comparison of knowledge of results scheduling methods for promoting motor skill acquisition and retention. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 65: 136-142.
27. WINNE, P. H. (1995). Inherent details of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30: 173-187.
28. WINSTEIN, C. J. AND SCMMIDT, R.A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 16: 677-691.
29. WINSTEIN, C. J., POHL, P. S. AND LEWTHWAITE, R. (1994). Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 65: 316-323.
30. WRIGHT, D. L., SNOWDOWN, S. AND WILLOUGHBY, D. (1990). Summary KR: How much information is used from the summary? J. Hum. Movement Stud., 19: 119-128.
31. WULF, G. AND SCHMIDT, R. A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 15: 748-757.
32. WULF, G. AND TOOLE, T. (1999). Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: Benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 70: 265-272.
33. WULF, G., SCHMIDT, R. A. AND DEUBEL, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor programs learning but not parameterization learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 19: 1134-1150.
34. WULF, G., SHEA, C. AND MATSCHINER, S. (1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. J. Motor Behav., 30: 180-192.
35. YOUNG, D. E. AND SCHMIDT, R. A. (1992). Augmented kinematic feedback for motor learning. J. Motor Behav., 24: 261-273.
36. ZIMMERMAN, B. J. AND PONS, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23: 614-628.