Transverse growth of the maxilla and mandible in untreated girls with low, average, and high MP-SN angles: A longitudinal study

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 128, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 716-723

  Wagner, Dawn M ^a,b   Chung, Chun Hsi ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b USAF   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FACE; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 29144438169     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.028     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. D.H. Enlow, M.G. Hans Essentials of facial growth 1996 W. B. Saunders Philadelphia
2. M.L. Moss The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112 1997 8 11
3. M.L. Moss The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 2. The role of an osseous connected cellular network Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112 1997 221 226
4. M.L. Moss The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 3. The genomic thesis Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112 1997 338 342
5. M.L. Moss The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 4. The epigenetic antithesis and the resolving synthesis Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112 1997 410 417
6. R.A. Finn Relationship of vertical maxillary dysplasias, bite force, and integrated EMG Abstracts of Conference on Craniofacial Research 1978 Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan Ann Arbor
7. W.R. Proffit, H.W. Fields, W.L. Nixon Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face adults J Dent Res 62 1983 566 571
8. T.E. Christie Cephalometric patterns of adults with normal occlusion Angle Orthod 47 1977 128 135
9. W.A. Weijs, B. Hillen Correlation between the cross-sectional area of the jaw muscles and craniofacial size and shape Am J Phys Anthropol 70 1986 423 431
10. P.H. van Sprosen, W.A. Weijs, J. Valk, B. Prahl-Andersen, F.C. van Ginkel Relationships between jaw muscle cross-sections and craniofacial morphology in normal adults, studied with magnetic resonance imaging Eur J Orthod 13 1991 351 361
11. S. Kiliaridis Masticatory muscle influence on craniofacial growth Acta Odontol Scand 53 1995 196 202
12. M. Tsunori, M. Mashita, K. Kasai Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning Angle Orthod 68 1998 557 562
13. F.F. Schudy The rotation of the mandible resulting from growth its implications in orthodontic treatment Angle Orthod 35 1965 36 50
14. J.R. Isaacson, R.J. Isaacson, T.M. Speidel, F.W. Worms Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations Angle Orthod 41 1971 219 229
15. C.-H. Chung, W.W. Wong Craniofacial growth in untreated Class II subjects a longitudinal study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122 2002 619 626
16. C.-H. Chung, V.D. Mongiovi Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class I subjects with low, average, and high MP-SN angles a longitudinal study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 2003 670 678
17. R.M. Ricketts, R.H. Roth, S.J. Chaconas, R.J. Schulhof, G.A. Engel Orthodontic diagnosis and planning 1982 Rocky Mountain Data Systems Denver
18. M.L. Riolo, R.E. Moyers, J.A. McNamara, W.S. Hunter An atlas of craniofacial growth: cephalometric standards from the University School Growth Study. Monograph no. 2. Craniofacial Growth Series 1974 Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan Ann Arbor
19. R.A. Riedel The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and normal occlusion Angle Orthod 22 1952 142 145
20. Requirements and limitations of roentgenographic cephalometry. Burlington Growth Centre; Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto.
21. B.H. Broadbent Sr, B.H. Broadbent Jr, W.Y. Golden Bolton standards of dentofacial developmental growth 1975 C. V. Mosby Saint Louis
22. J. Ghafari, P.E. Cater, F.S. Shofer Effect of film-object distance on posteroanterior cephalometric measurements suggestions for standardized cephalometric methods Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108 1995 30 37
23. S.H.Y. Wei Craniofacial width dimensions Angle Orthod 40 1970 141 147
24. C.H. Ingerslev, B. Solow Sex differences in craniofacial morphology Acta Odont Scand 33 1975 85 94
25. A.E. Athanasios, H. Droschl, C. Bosch Data and patterns of transverse dentofacial structure of 6- to 15-year-old children a posteroanterior cephalometric study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 101 1992 465 471
26. S.F. Snodell, R.S. Nanda, G.F. Currier Longitudinal cephalometric study of transverse and vertical craniofacial growth Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104 1993 471 483
27. S. Cortella, F.S. Shofer, J. Ghafari Transverse development of the jaws norms for the posteroanterior cephalometric analysis Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112 1997 519 522
28. W.M. Krogman Craniofacial growth, prenatal and postnatal 1979 W. B. Saunders Philadelphia
29. A. Björk, V. Skieller Growth in the width of the maxilla studied by the implant method Scand J Plast Resconstr Surg 8 1974 26 33
30. A. Björk, V. Skieller Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method Br J Orthod 4 1977 53 64
31. E.L. Korn, S. Baumrind Transverse development of the human jaws between the ages of 8.5 and 15.5 years, studied longitudinally with use of implants J Dent Res 69 1990 1298 1306