Observational constraints on silent quartessence

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Volumn , Issue 11, 2005, Pages 145-159

  Amendola, L ^a   Waga, I ^b   Finelli, F ^c  

^a INAF OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI ROMA   (Italy)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^c OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Classical tests of cosmology; CMBR theory; Dark energy theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 29044450679     PISSN: 14757516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/11/009     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Amendola L 2000 Coupled quintessence Phys. Rev. D 62 043511
2. Mainini R and Bonometto S A 2004 Dark matter and dark energy from the solution of the strong CP problem Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 121301
3. Makler M, Oliveira S Q and Waga I 2003 Constraints on the generalized Chaplygin gas from supernovae observations Phys. Lett. B 555 1
4. Kamenshchik A, Moschella U and Pasquier V 2001 An alternative to quintessence Phys. Lett. B 511 265
5. Bilić N, Tupper G B and Viollier R D 2002 Unification of dark matter and dark energy: the inhomogeneous Chaplygin gas Phys. Lett. B 535 17
6. Bento M C, Bertolami O and Sen A A 2002 Generalized Chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion and dark energy-matter unification Phys. Rev. D 66 043507
7. Avelino P P, Beça L M G, de Carvalho J P M and Martins C J A P 2003 The ΛCDM limit of the generalized Chaplygin gas scenario J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP09(2003)002
8. Makler M, Oliveira S Q and Waga I 2003 Observational constraints on Chaplygin quartessence: background results Phys. Rev. D 68 123521
9. Dev A, Jain D and Alcaniz J S 2004 Constraints on Chaplygin quartessence from the CLASS gravitational lens statistics and supernova data Astron. Astrophys. 417 847
10. Colistete R Jr and Fabris J C 2005 Bayesian analysis of the (generalized) Chaplygin gas and cosmological constant models using the 157 gold SNe Ia data Class. Quantum Grav. 22 2813
11. Bento M C, Bertolami O, Santos N M C and Sen A A 2005 Supernovae constraints on models of dark energy revisited Phys. Rev. D 71 063501
12. Carturan D and Finelli F 2003 Cosmological effects of a class of fluid dark energy models Phys. Rev. D 68 103501
13. Sandvik H, Tegmark M, Zaldarriaga M and Waga I 2004 The end of unified dark matter? Phys. Rev. D 69 123524
14. Amendola L, Finelli F, Burigana C and Carturan D 2003 WMAP and the generalized Chaplygin gas J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP07(2003)005
15. Bean R and Dore O 2003 Are Chaplygin gases serious contenders for the dark energy? Phys. Rev. D 68 023515
16. In contrast with the CMB results of the present work, see also Bento M C, Bertolami O and Sen A A 2003 Generalized Chaplygin gas and CMBR constraint Phys. Rev. D 67 063003 (This work was the first attempt to obtain limits on the Chaplygin parameter space based only on peaks location.)
17. Reis R R R, Waga I, Calṽo M O and Jorás S E 2003 Entropy perturbations in quartessence Chaplygin models Phys. Rev. D 68 061302(R)
18. Hu W 1998 Structure formation with generalized dark matter Astrophys. J. 506 485
19. Reis R R R, Makler M and Waga I 2005 Matter Power Spectrum for Convex Quartessence Class. Quantum Grav. 22 353
20. Makler M, Reis R R R, Amendola L and Waga I 2005 in preparation
21. Riess A G et al 2004 Type Ia Supernova discoveries at z>1 from the Hubble space telescope: evidence for past deceleration and constraints on dark energy evolution Astrophys. J. 607 665
22. Freedman W et al 2001 Final results from the Hubble space telescope key project to measure the Hubble constant Astrophys. J. 553 47
23. Kirkman D et al 2003 The cosmological baryon density from the deuterium to hydrogen ratio towards QSO absorption systems: D/H towards Q1243+3047 Astrophys. J. Suppl. 149 1
24. White S D M and Frenk C S 1991 Galaxy formation through hierarchical clustering Astrophys. J. 379 52
25. White S D M, Navarro J F, Evrard A E and Frenk C 1993 The baryon content of galaxy clusters: a challenge to cosmological orthodoxy Nature 366 429
26. Sasaki S 1996 A new method to estimate cosmological parameters using baryon fraction of clusters of galaxies Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 48 L119
27. Pen U 1997 The universal deceleration and angular diameter distances to clusters of galaxies New Astron. 2 309
28. Allen S W, Schmidt R W and Fabian A C 2002 Cosmological constraints from the x-ray gas mass fraction in relaxed lensing clusters observed with Chandra Mont. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 334 L11
29. Allen S W et al 2004 Constraints on dark energy from Chandra observations of the largest relaxed galaxy clusters Mont. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 353 457
30. Rappeti D, Allen S W and Weller J 2005 Constraining dark energy with x-ray galaxy clusters, supernovae and the cosmic microwave background Mont. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 360 555
31. Hinshaw G et al (WMAP collaboration) 2003 First year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: angular power spectrum Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148 135
32. Verde L et al (WMAP collaboration) 2003 First year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: parameter estimation methodology Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148 195
33. Tegmark M et al (the SDSS collaboration) 2004 Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP Phys. Rev. D 69 103501
34. Tegmark M et al (the SDSS collaboration) 2004 The 3D power spectrum of galaxies from the SDSS Astrophys. J. 606 702
35. http://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/sdss.html
36. Seljak U and Zaldarriaga M 1996 A line of sight approach to cosmic microwave background anisotropies Astrophys. J. 469 437
37. Reis R R R, Makler M and Waga I 2004 Skewness as a test for Quartessence Phys. Rev. D 69 101301(R)