Screening of grape (Vitis vinifera) genotypes for drought tolerance

Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 355-357

  Ramteke, S D ^a   Karibasappa, G S ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GRAPES   (India)

Author keywords

Drought tolerance; Genotypes; Grape; Indices; Vitis vinifera

Indexed keywords

CANIS FAMILIARIS; VITIS; VITIS MUSTANGENSIS; VITIS SP.; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 29044446733     PISSN: 00195022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bates L S, Waldren R P and Tease R D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline in water stress studies. Plant and Soil 38 : 205.
2. Bota J, Flexas J and Medrano H. 2001. Genetic variability of photosynthesis and water use in Balearic grape wine cultivars. Annals of Applied Biology 138(3) : 353-61.
3. Chadha K L. 1984. Grape research in India-Priorities and suggestions, approach for future. Indian Journal of Horticulture 41(3,4) : 145-59.
4. Gomez del, Campo M, Ruiz C, Baeza P and Lissarrague J R. 2003. Drought adaptation strategies of four grape wine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.): Modification of the properties of the leaf area. Journal of International DES Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 37(3): 131-43.
5. Kaiser R M, Cavagnaro J B, Rios M and Vallone R C. 2004. Response of Argentian and Europian cultivars of Vitis Vinifera L. to water stress: II. Water relations. Acta Horticulturae 646 : 47-54.
6. Leeuwen C van, Tregoat O, Chone X, Jeack M E, Rabusseau S, Gaudiller J P, van-Leeuwen C. 2003. Assessment of vine water uptake conditions and its influence on fruit ripening. Bulletin-de-I'OIV 76 : 867-8.
7. Lovisolo C, Schubert A, Peterlunger E, Farraris S, Bravdo B A. 2000. Sap flow and stem conductivity of potted water stressed grapevines. Acta Horticulturae 526 : 187-91.
8. Padgett Johnson M, William L E and Walker M A. 2003. Vine water relations, gas exchange, and vegetative growth of seventeen Vitis species grown under irrigated and nonirrigated conditions in California. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science 128(2) : 269-76.
9. Prakash G S, Bhatt R M and Babu H K N. 2001. Physiological response of grapevine rootstock cultivars to moisture stress. Indian Journal of Horticulture 58(4) : 321-7.
10. Porten M, Manty F, Ruhl E H (ed) and Schmid J. 1999. Sap flow measurement on different scion varieties. Acta horticulturae 493 : 187-96.
11. Patil S G, Karkamkar S P and Deshmukh M R. 2003. Evaluation of Grape varieties for their drought tolerance. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities 28(3) : 250-1.
12. Prakash G S and Bhat R M. 1999. Physiological response of grapevine rootstock cultivars to moisture stress. Indian journal of Horticulture 58(4) : 321-7.
13. Ramteke S D, Somkuwar R G and Satisha J. 1999. Response of Tas-A-Ganesh vines on Dog Ridge rootstock to the imposed water stress. Souvenir, National Dialogue on Sustaining the Productivity of Grapes under Adverse Situations during 7-8 June 1999 held at Pune (India) pp 46-50.
14. Satisha J. 2004. 'Studies on genetic variability in water use efficiency of grape varieties, rootstocks and their stionic combinations Ph D thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka (unpublished).
15. Schultz H R and Bravdo B A. 2000. Physiological mechanisms of water use efficacy in grapevines under drought conditions. (in) Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Grapevine Physiology, held in Jerusalem, Israel, during 25-30 May 1997. Acta horticulturae 526 : 115-36.