Curricular evaluation of scientific publications;Valoración curricular de las publicaciones científicas

Medicina Clinica

Volumn 125, Issue 17, 2005, Pages 661-665

  Figueredo Gaspari, Eduardo ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL TORRECÁRDENAS   (Spain)

^b 6 C ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 29044439897     PISSN: 00257753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13081386     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Boletin Oficial de la Comunidad de Madrid. 13 de septiembre de 2004. Disponible en: http://www.madrid.org/comun/bocm/Html/0,2930,3029_ 14210_14472_12294938_20040913_40,00.html
2. Boletín Oficial del Estado, núm. 047, del 24 de febrero de 2004. Resolución 3422.
3. Butler L. A list of published papers is no measure of value. Nature. 2002;419:877.
4. Broad WJ. The publishing game: getting more to less. Science. 1981;211:1.137-9.
5. Cami J. Evaluación de la investigación científica. Med Clin (Barc). 2001;117:510-3.
6. Bordons M, Zulueta MA. Evaluación de la actividad científica a través de indicadores bibliométricos. Rev Esp Cardiol. 1999;52:790-800.
7. Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA. 1997;278:579-85.
8. Burman KD. Hanging from the masthead: reflections on authorship. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:602-5.
9. Lindsey D. Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: the problem of multiple authorship. Soc Stud Sci. 1980;10:145-62.
10. Garfield E. More of the ethics of scientific publication: abuses of authorship attribution and citation amnesia undermine the reword system of science. Current Contents. 1982;30:5-10.
11. Trenchard PM. Hierarchical bibliometry: a new objective measure of individual scientific performance to replace publication counts and to complement citation measures. J Inf Sci. 1992;18:69-75.
12. Figueredo E. Publicaciones científicas originadas en los departamentos de anestesiologia españoles en el decenio 1989-1998. Autoría de los articulos. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1999;46:378-84.
13. Petroianu A. Critérios quantitativos para analisar o valor da publicação de artigos científicos. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2003;49:173-6.
14. Trueba FJ, Guerrero H. A robust formula to credit authors for their publications. Scientometrics. 2004;60:181-204.
15. Moed H, Burger WJM, Frankfort JG, Van Raan AFJ. The application of bibliometric indicators: important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered. Scientometrics. 1985;8:177-203.
16. Narin F. Evaluative bibliometrics: the use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Report to the National Science Foundation. Cherry Hill, NJ: Computer Horizons; 1976.
17. Irvine J. Evaluation of scientific institutions: lessons from a bibliometric study of a UK Technical University. En: Evered D, Harnett S, editors. The evaluation of scientific research. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
18. Butler L, Laudel G, Donovan C, Jackson F, Siddle D, Lucas I. Strategic assessment of research performance indicators. ARC Linkage Project. Disponible en: http://repp.anu.edu.au/
19. National Board of Employment, Education and Training (NBEET). Research performance indicators survey, Commissioned Report No. 21, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia, 1993. Disponible en: http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/93_01.pdf
20. Glänzel W, Moed H. Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics. 2002;53:171-93.
21. Ojasoo T, Maisonneuve H, Matillon Y. The impact factor of medical journals, a bibliometric indicator to be handled with care. Presse Medicale. 2002;31:775-81.
22. Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques. Science & technologie indicateurs 1998. París: Economica & OST; 1998.
23. Seglen PO. From bad to worse: evaluation by journal impact. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 1989;14:326-7.
24. Figueredo E, García Villalba FJ, Blanque R. Análisis de las citas bibliográficas recibidas por las publicaciones de los anestesiólogos españoles (incluidas en el Science Citation Index) en el período 1988-2002. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2004;51:429-37.
25. Conn DA, Asbury AJ. Importance of components of the curriculum vitae in determining appointment to senior registrar posts. Anaesthesia. 1994;49:623-6.
26. Rinia EJ, Van Leeuwen TN, Van Vuren HG, Van Raan AFJ. Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria. Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands. Research Policy. 1998;27:95-107.
27. Van Leeuwen T. Descriptive versus evaluative bibliometrics. En: Hoed HF, Glänzel W, Schmoch U, editors. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies f S&T Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 2004. p. 373-88.
28. Long JS, McGinnis R. On adjusting productivity measures for multiple authorship. Scientometrics. 1982;4:379-87.
29. Camí J. Impactolatría: diagnóstico y tratamiento. Med Clin (Barc). 1997;109:515-24.
30. Council of Science and Technology Advisors. Science and technology excellence in the public service-A framework for excellence in federally performed science and technology, 2001. Disponible en: http://www. csta-cest.ca/