Structure-activity relationship study of a diverse set of estrogen receptor ligands (I) using MultiCASE expert system

Chemosphere

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 445-459

  Klopman, Gilles ^a,b   Chakravarti, Suman K ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MULTICASE Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Biophores; Endocrine disruption; Estrogen receptor; Quantitative structure activity relationship

Indexed keywords

EXPERT SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

BINDING ACTIVITY;

HORMONES;

ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; LIGAND;

ENDOCRINE SYSTEM;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ENDOCRINE DISEASE; EXPERT SYSTEM; HORMONE METABOLISM; LIGAND BINDING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RECEPTOR BINDING; REPORTER GENE;

EID: 0037400791     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00859-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Blair, R.M., Fang, H., Branham, W.S., Hass, B.S., Dial, S.L., Moland, C.L., Tong, W., Shi, L., Perkins, R., Sheehan, D.M., 2000. The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands. Toxicol. Sci. 54 (1), 138-153.
2. Brzozowski, A.M., Pike, A.C., Dauter, Z., Hubbard, R.E., Bonn, T., Engstrom, O., Ohman, L., Greene, G.L., Gustafsson, J.A., Carlquist, M., 1997. Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor. Nature 389, 753-758.
3. Colborn, T., 1995. Environmental estrogens: health implications for humans and wildlife. Environ. Health Perspect. 103 (Suppl. 7), 135-136.
4. Colborn, T., vom Saal, F.S., Soto, A.M., 1993. Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. Environ. Health Perspect. 101 (5), 378-384.
5. Crisp, T.M., Clegg, E.D., Cooper, R.L., Wood, W.P., Anderson, A.G., Baetcke, K.P., Hoffmann, J.L., Morrow, M.S., Rodier, D.J., Schaeffer, J.E., Touart, L.W., Zeeman, M.G., Patel, Y.M., 1998. Environmental endocrine disruption: an effects assessment and analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 106 (Suppl. 1), 11-56.
6. Cunningham, A.R., Klopman, G., Rosenkranz, H.S., 1997. A dichotomy in the lipophilicity of natural estrogens, xenoestrogens, and phytoestrogens. Environ. Health Perspect. 105 (Suppl. 3), 665-668.
7. Cunningham, A.R., Rosenkranz, H.S., Klopman, G., 1998. Structural analysis of a group of phytoestrogens for the presence of a 2-D geometric descriptor associated with nongenotoxic carcinogens and some estrogens. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 217 (3), 288-292.
8. Fang, H., Tong, W., Perkins, R., Soto, A.M., Prechtl, N., Sheehan, D., 2000. Quantitative comparison of in vitro assays for estrogenic activity. Environ. Health Perspect. 108 (8), 723-729.
9. Fang, H., Tong, W., Shi, L.M., Blair, R., Perkins, R., Branham, W., Hass, B.S., Xie, Q., Dial, S.L., Moland, C.L., Sheehan, D.M., 2001. Structure-activity relationships for a large diverse set of natural, synthetic, and environmental estrogens. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14 (3), 280-294.
10. Kavlock, R.J., Daston, G.P., DeRosa, C., Fenner-Crisp, P., Gray, L.E., Kaattari, S., Lucier, G., Luster, M., Mac, M.J., Maczka, C., Miller, R., Moore, J., Rolland, R., Scott, G., Sheehan, D.M., Sinks, T., Tilson, H.A., 1996. Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disrupters: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop. Environ. Health Perspect. 104 (Suppl. 4), 715-740.
11. Klopman, G., 1984. Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies. Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106 (24), 7315-7321.
12. Klopman, G., 1992. MULTICASE. 1. A hierarchical computer automated structure evaluation program. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 11 (2), 176-184.
13. Klopman, G., Ptchelintsev, D., 1992. Application of the computer automated structure evaluation methodology to a QSAR study of chemoreception. Aromatic musky odorants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40 (11), 2244-2251.
14. Klopman, G., Srivastava, S., 1990. Computer-automated structure evaluation of gastric antiulcer compounds: study of cytoprotective and antisecretory imidazo[1,2-a] pyridines and pyrazines. Mol. Pharmacol. 37 (6), 958-965.
15. Kramer, V.J., Giesy, J.P., 1999. Specific binding of hydroxylated polychlorinated biphenyl metabolites and other substances to bovine calf uterine estrogen receptor: structure-binding relationships. Sci. Total Environ. 233 (1-3), 141-161.
16. Preziosi, P., 1998. Natural and anthropogenic environmental estrogens: the scientific basis for risk assessment. Endocrine disrupters as environmental signalers: an introduction. Pure Appl. Chem. 70 (9), 1617-1631.
17. Rannug, U., Sjoegren, M., Rannug, A., Gillner, M., Toftgaard, R., Gustafsson, J.A., Rosenkranz, H., Klopman, G., 1991. Use of artificial intelligence in structure-affinity correlations of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) receptor ligands. Carcinogenesis (London) 12 (11), 2007-2015.
18. Rosenkranz, H.S., Cunningham, A., Klopman, G., 1996. Identification of a 2-D geometric descriptor associated with non-genotoxic carcinogens and some estrogens and antiestrogens. Mutagenesis 11 (1), 95-100.
19. Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996, August 6, 1996. Public Law 104-182, Section 123, 104th Congress.
20. Schmieder, P.K., Aptula, A.O., Routledge, E.J., Sumpter, J.P., Mekenyan, O.G., 2000. Estrogenicity of alkylphenolic compounds: a 3-D structure-activity evaluation of gene activation. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19 (7), 1727-1740.
21. Shi, L.M., Fang, H., Tong, W., Wu, J., Perkins, R., Blair, R.M., Branham, W.S., Dial, S.L., Moland, C.L., Sheehan, D.M., 2001. QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41 (1), 186-195.
22. Shiau, A.K., Barstad, D., Loria, P.M., Cheng, L., Kushner, P.J., Agard, D.A., Greene, G.L., 1998. The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen. Cell 95, 927-937.
23. Sippl, W., 2000. Receptor-based 3D QSAR analysis of estrogen receptor ligands - merging the accuracy of receptor-based alignments with the computational efficiency of ligand-based methods. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 14 (6), 559-572.
24. Sippl, W., Holtje, H.D., 2000. Structure-based 3D-QSAR - merging the accuracy of structure-based alignments with the computational efficiency of ligand-based methods. THEOCHEM 503 (1-2), 31-50.
25. Soto, A.M., Sonneschein, C., Chung, K.L., Fernandez, M.F., Olea, N., Serrano, F.O., 1995. The E-SCREEN assay as a tool to identify estrogens: An update on estrogenic environmental pollutants. Environ. Health Perspect. 103, 113-122.
26. Tong, W., Perkins, R., Strelitz, R., Collantes, E.R., Keenan, S., Welsh, W.J., Branham, W.S., Sheehan, D.M., 1997. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for estrogen binding to the estrogen receptor: predictions across species. Environ. Health Perspect. 105 (10), 1116-1124.
27. Waller, C.L., Oprea, T.I., Chae, K., Park, H.K., Korach, K.S., Laws, S.C., Wiese, T.E., Kelce, W.R., Gray, L.E.J., 1996. Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 9 (8), 1240-1248.
28. Zacharewski, T., 1998. Identification and assessment of endocrine disrupters: limitations of in vivo and in vitro assays. Environ. Health Perspect. 106 (Suppl. 2), 577-582.