Evaluation of a profilometrical method for monitoring erosive tooth wear

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 505-511

  Schlueter, Nadine ^a,b   Ganss, Carolina ^a   De Sanctis, Stefano ^a   Klimek, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

^b Dental Clinic   (Germany)

Author keywords

Erosion; In vivo; Measurement; Profilometry; Tooth wear

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH; TOOTH DISEASE;

DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; TOOTH; TOOTH ABRASION; TOOTH ATTRITION; TOOTH EROSION;

EID: 28944453659     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00253.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ZIPKIN J, MCCLURE F. Salivary citrate and dental erosion. J Dent Res 1949; 28: 613-626.
2. AZZOPARDI A, BARTLETT DW, WATSON TF, SMITH GN. A literature review of the techniques to measure tooth wear and erosion. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000; 8: 93-97.
3. ECCLES JD. Dental erosion of nonindustrial origin. A clinical survey and classification. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42: 649-653.
4. SMITH BG, KNIGHT JK. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J 1984; 156: 435-438.
5. SORVARI R, KIVIRANTA I. A semiquantitative method of recording experimental tooth erosion and estimation of occlusal wear in the rat. Arch Oral Biol 1988; 33: 217-220.
6. MISTRY M, GRENBY TH. Erosion by soft drinks of rat molar teeth assessed by digital image analysis. Caries Res 1993; 27: 21-25.
7. PESUN IJ, OLSON AK, HODGES JS, ANDERSON GC. In vivo evaluation of the surface of posterior resin composite restorations: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 353-359.
8. PINTADO MR, ANDERSON GC, DELONG R, DOUGLAS WH. Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 313-320.
9. MEHL A, GLOGER W, KUNZELMANN KH, HICKEL R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1799-1807.
10. CHADWICK RG, MITCHELL HL. Conduct of an algorithm in quantifying simulated palatal surface tooth erosion. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 450-456.
11. CHADWICK RG, MITCHELL HL, WARD S. Evaluation of the accuracy and reproducibility of a replication technique for the manufacture of electroconductive replicas for use in quantitative clinical dental wear studies. J Oral Rehab 2002; 29: 540-545.
12. CHADWICK RG, MITCHELL HL, WARD S. A novel approach to evaluating the reproducibility of a replication technique for the manufacture of electroconductive replicas for use in quantitative clinical dental wear studies. J Oral Rehab 2004; 31: 335-339.
13. HUYSMANS MC, THIJSSEN JM. Ultrasonic measurement of enamel thickness: a tool for monitoring dental erosion? J Dent 2000; 28: 187-191.
14. BARBOUR ME, PARKER DM, ALLEN GC, JANDT KD. Human enamel dissolution in citric acid as a function of pH in the range 2.30 < =pH < =6.30 - a nanoindentation study. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 258-262.
15. DE JOSSELIN DE JONG E, VAN DER LINDEN AHIM, BORSBOOM PCF, TEN BOSCH JJ. Determination of mineral changes in human dental enamel by longitudinal microradiography and scanning optical monitoring and their correlation with chemical analysis. Caries Res 1988; 22: 153-159.
16. GANSS C, LUSSI A, KLIMEK J. Comparison of calcium/phosphorus analysis, longitudinal microradiography and profilometry for the quantitative assessment of erosive demineralisation. Caries Res 2005; 39: 178-184.
17. HALL AF, SADLER JP, STRANG R, DE JOSSELIN DJ, FOYE RH, CREANOR SL. Application of transverse microradiography for measurement of mineral loss by acid erosion. Adv Dent Res 1997; 11: 420-425.
18. ATTIN T, ZIRKEL C, HELLWIG E. Brushing abrasion of eroded dentin after application of sodium fluoride solutions. Caries Res 1998; 32: 344-350.
19. DAVIS WB, WINTER PJ. Measurement in vitro of enamel abrasion by dentifrice. J Dent Res 1976; 55: 970-975.
20. GANSS C, KLIMEK J, SCHWARZ N. A comparative profilometric in vitro study of the susceptibility of polished and natural human enamel and dentine surfaces to erosive demineralisation. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45: 897-902.
21. GANSS C, KLIMEK J, SCHÄFFER U, SPALL T. Effectiveness of two fluoridation measures on erosion progression in human enamel and dentine in vitro. Caries Res 2001; 35: 325-330.
22. WEST NX, MAXWELL A, HUGHES JA, PARKER DM, NEWCOMBE RG, ADDY M. A method to measure clinical erosion: the effect of orange juice consumption on erosion of enamel. J Dent 1998; 26: 329-335.
23. GRENBY TH. Methods of assessing erosion and erosive potential. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 207-214.
24. LAST JM. A dictionary of epidemiology, 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
25. BLAND JM, ALTMAN DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
26. BARTLETT DW, BLUNT L, SMITH BG. Measurement of tooth wear in patients with palatal erosion. Br Dent J 1997; 182: 179-184.
27. CHADWICK RG, MITCHELL HL, CAMERON I, HUNTER B, TULLEY M. Development of a novel system for assessing tooth and restoration wear. J Dent 1997; 25: 41-47.
28. LUSSI A, SCHAFFNER M. Progression of and risk factors for dental erosion and wedge-shaped defects over a 6-year period. Caries Res 2000; 34: 182-187.
29. LAMBRECHTS P, BRAEM M, VUYLSTEKE-WAUTERS M, VANHERLE G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1752-1754.
30. GRINE FE. Enamel thickness of deciduous and permanent molars in modern Homo sapiens. Am J Phys Anthropol 2005; 126: 14-31.