메뉴 건너뛰기
Archives of Internal Medicine
Volumn 165, Issue 22, 2005, Pages 2559-2560
Peer review and professionalism at the Archives of Internal Medicine
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

COCHRANE LIBRARY; COMPETENCE; EDITORIAL; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS REVIEW ORGANIZATION; PUBLICATION;
EID: 28944449056     PISSN: 00039926     EISSN: 15383679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2559     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (3)
References (12)
  • 1
    • 3242802015 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A new editorial team for Archives of Internal Medicine: The choices we make
    • Greenland P. A new editorial team for Archives of Internal Medicine: the choices we make. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1480-1481.
    • (2004) Arch Intern Med , vol.164 , pp. 1480-1481
    • Greenland, P.1
  • 2
    • 0034843219 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review: Recognition and responsibility
    • Wechsler A. Peer review: recognition and responsibility. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:419-420.
    • (2001) J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg , vol.122 , pp. 419-420
    • Wechsler, A.1
  • 3
    • 0037224413 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What's taking so long?
    • What's taking so long? Nat Genet. 2003;33:1-2.
    • (2003) Nat Genet , vol.33 , pp. 1-2
  • 4
    • 1542394875 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review time: How late is late in a small medical journal?
    • Kljakovic-Gaspic M, Hren D, Marusic A, Marusic M. Peer review time: how late is late in a small medical journal? Arch Med Res. 2003;34:439-443.
    • (2003) Arch Med Res , vol.34 , pp. 439-443
    • Kljakovic-Gaspic, M.1    Hren, D.2    Marusic, A.3    Marusic, M.4
  • 5
    • 0037024222 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication bias in editorial decision making: Assessment of reports of controlled trials submitted to JAMA
    • Olson CM, Rennie D, Cook D, et al. Publication bias in editorial decision making: assessment of reports of controlled trials submitted to JAMA. JAMA. 2002;287:2825-2828.
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , pp. 2825-2828
    • Olson, C.M.1    Rennie, D.2    Cook, D.3
  • 6
    • 0037024264 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Measuring the quality of editorial peer review
    • Jefferson T, Wager E, Davidoff F. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA. 2002;287:2786-2790.
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , pp. 2786-2790
    • Jefferson, T.1    Wager, E.2    Davidoff, F.3
  • 7
    • 0037024214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of editorial peer review: A systematic review
    • Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review JAMA. 2002;287:2784-2786.
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , pp. 2784-2786
    • Jefferson, T.1    Alderson, P.2    Wager, E.3    Davidoff, F.4
  • 8
    • 14944363155 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • At FDA, strong drug ties and less monitoring
    • December 6
    • Gardiner Harris. At FDA, strong drug ties and less monitoring. New York Times. December 6, 2004:A1, A20.
    • (2004) New York Times
    • Harris, G.1
  • 9
    • 84962999444 scopus 로고
    • The professions and social structure
    • Parsons T. The professions and social structure. Soc Forces. 1939;17:457-467.
    • (1939) Soc Forces , vol.17 , pp. 457-467
    • Parsons, T.1
  • 10
    • 28944445681 scopus 로고
    • The Hippocratic Oath
    • The Hippocratic Oath. JAMA. 1939;113-1158.
    • (1939) JAMA , pp. 113-1158
  • 11
    • 0025015166 scopus 로고
    • The evolution of editorial peer review
    • Burnham JC. The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA. 1990;263:1323-1329.
    • (1990) JAMA , vol.263 , pp. 1323-1329
    • Burnham, J.C.1
  • 12
    • 0025020192 scopus 로고
    • Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism
    • Kronick DA. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA. 1990;263:1321-1322.
    • (1990) JAMA , vol.263 , pp. 1321-1322
    • Kronick, D.A.1

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.