Time-resolved-correlation measurements of temporally heterogeneous dynamics

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 72, Issue 5, 2005, Pages

  Duri, Agnès ^a   Bissig, Hugo ^b   Trappe, Véronique ^b   Cipelletti, Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ MONTPELLIER 2   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HETEROGENEOUS DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION;

CORRELATION METHODS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LIGHT SCATTERING; PROBABILITY;

DYNAMICS;

EID: 28844501794     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.051401     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. L. Cipelletti and L. Ramos, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter JCOMEL 0953-8984 10.1088/0953-8984/17/6/R01 17, R253 (2005).
2. K. Dawson, G. Foffi, M. Fuchs, W. Gotze, F. Sciortino, M. Sperl, P. Tartaglia, T. Voigtmann, and E. Zaccarelli, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.011401 63, 011401 (2001).
3. T. Eckert and E. Bartsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.125701 89, 125701 (2002).
4. K. N. Pham, A. M. Puertas, J. Bergenholtz, S. U. Egelhaaf, A. Moussaid, P. N. Pusey, A. B. Schofield, M. E. Cates, M. Fuchs, and W. C. K. Poon, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1068238 296, 104 (2002).
5. A. Liu and S. Nagel, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/23819 396, 21 (1998).
6. L. Cipelletti, S. Manley, R. C. Ball, and D. A. Weitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2275 84, 2275 (2000).
7. A. Knaebel, M. Bellor, J. P. Munch, V. Viasnoff, F. Lequeux, and J. L. Harden, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2000-00406-6 52, 73 (2000).
8. V. Viasnoff and F. Lequeux, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.065701 89, 065701 (2002).
9. D. Bonn, S. Tanase, B. Abou, H. Tanaka, and J. Meunier, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.015701 89, 015701 (2002).
10. E. Weeks, J. Crocker, A. Levitt, A. Schofield, and D. Weitz, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.287.5453.627 287, 627 (2000).
11. W. K. Kegel and A. van Blaaderen, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.287.5451.290 287, 290 (2000).
12. P. Mayer, H. Bissig, L. Berthier, L. Cipelletti, J. P. Garrahan, P. Sollich, and V. Trappe, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.115701 93, 115701 (2004).
13. B. J. Berne and R. Pecora, Dynamic Light Scattering (Wiley, New York, 1976).
14. J. W. Goodman, in Laser Speckles and Related Phenomena, Vol. 9 of Topics in Applied Physics, edited by, J. C. Dainty, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975), p. 9.
15. D. A. Weitz and D. J. Pine, in Dynamic Light Scattering, edited by, W. Brown, (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993), p. 652.
16. J. Muller and T. Palberg, Prog. Colloid Polym. Sci. PCPSD7 0340-255X 100, 121 (1996).
17. K. N. Pham, S. U. Egelhaaf, A. Moussaid, and P. N. Pusey, Rev. Sci. Instrum. RSINAK 0034-6748 10.1063/1.1753105 75, 2419 (2004).
18. In both methods, different speckles correspond to a different angular orientation of the sample. A given speckle is sampled only once at each sample revolution; thus, the minimum accessible lag is the period of revolution and any spurious decay of the correlation function due to sample rotation is avoided.
19. A. P. Y. Wong and P. Wiltzius, Rev. Sci. Instrum. RSINAK 0034-6748 10.1063/1.1143864 64, 2547 (1993).
20. S. Kirsch, V. Frenz, W. Schartl, E. Bartsch, and H. Sillescu, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.470761 104, 1758 (1996).
21. L. Cipelletti and D. A. Weitz, Rev. Sci. Instrum. RSINAK 0034-6748 10.1063/1.1149894 70, 3214 (1999).
22. L. Cipelletti, H. Bissig, V. Trappe, P. Ballesta, and S. Mazoyer, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter JCOMEL 0953-8984 10.1088/0953-8984/15/1/334 15, S257 (2003).
23. V. Viasnoff, F. Lequeux, and D. J. Pine, Rev. Sci. Instrum. RSINAK 0034-6748 10.1063/1.1476699 73, 2336 (2002).
24. F. Cardinaux, L. Cipelletti, F. Scheffold, and P. Schurtenberger, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2002-00525-0 57, 738 (2002).
25. O. Diat, T. Narayanan, D. L. Abernathy, and G. Grubel, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. COCSFL 1359-0294 3, 305 (1998).
26. M. L. Cowan, I. P. Jones, J. H. Page, and D. A. Weitz, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.066605 65, 066605 (2002).
27. N. Lačević, F. W. Starr, T. B. Schroder, and S. C. Glotzer, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1605094 119, 7372 (2003).
28. S. Whitelam, L. Berthier, and J. P. Garrahan, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.026128 71, 026128 (2005).
29. E. Pitard, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.041504 71, 041504 (2005).
30. A. de Candia, E. Del Gado, A. Fierro, N. Sator, and A. Coniglio, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/j.physa.2005.07.003 358, 239 (2005).
31. N. Lačević, F. W. Starr, T. B. Schroder, V. N. Novikov, and S. C. Glotzer, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.030101 66, 030101 (2002).
32. H. Bissig, S. Romer, L. Cipelletti, V. Trappe, and P. Schurtenberger, PhysChemComm PHCCFX 1460-2733 10.1039/b211806h 6, 21 (2003).
33. R. Sarcia and P. Hebraud, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.011402 72, 011402 (2005).
34. P. Ballesta, C. Ligoure, and L. Cipelletti, AIP Conf. Proc. APCPCS 0094-243X 10.1063/1.1764063 708, 68 (2004).
35. A. Duri, P. Ballesta, L. Cipelletti, H. Bissig, and V. Trappe, Fluct. Noise Lett. 0219-4775 5, L1 (2005).
36. H. Bissig, PhD thesis, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, 2004, also available at http://www.unifr.ch/physics/mm/index.php.
37. G. Caballero, A. A. Lindner, G. Ovarlez, G. Reydellet, J. Lanuza, and E. Clement, cond-mat/0403604.
38. C. Chamon, P. Charbonneau, L. F. Cugliandolo, D. R. Reichman, and M. Sellitto, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1809585 121, 10120 (2004).
39. M. Clusel, J.-Y. Fortin, and P. C. W. Holdsworth, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.046112 70, 046112 (2004).
40. M. Merolle, J. P. Garrahan, and D. Chandler, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.0504820102 102, 10837 (2005).
41. A. Crisanti and F. Ritort, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2003-10158-3 66, 253 (2004).
42. S. T. Bramwell, K. Christensen, J.-Y. Fortin, P. C. W. Holdsworth, H. J. Jensen, S. Lise, J. M. Lopez, M. Nicodemi, J.-F. Pinton, and M. Sellitto, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3744 84, 3744 (2000).
43. P. A. Lemieux and D. J. Durian, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A JOAOD6 0740-3232 16, 1651 (1999).
44. P. A. Lemieux and D. J. Durian, Appl. Opt. APOPAI 0003-6935 40, 3984 (2001).
45. K. Schmidt-Rohr and H. W. Spiess, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.3020 66, 3020 (1991).
46. M. B. Weissman, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.829 65, 829 (1993).
47. D. J. Durian, D. J. Pine, and D. A. Weitz, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 252, 686 (1991).
48. For a foam, g2̄ measured in the transmission geometry is usually fitted by a more complicated expression, which can be found in Ref.. Within the experimental uncertainty, the function of Ref. can be very well approximated by a slightly stretched exponential, which we adopt for the sake of simplicity.
49. In the linear fit of σcI2 vs N-1, we weight the data by the inverse of their uncertainty, which we take to be equal to σcI.
50. B. R. Frieden, Probability, Statistical Optics, and Data Testing 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2001).
51. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
52. O. Glatter, J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 0021-8898 10.1107/S0021889877013879 10, 415 (1977).
53. O. Glatter, in Neutrons, X-rays and Light: Scattering Methods Applied to Soft Condensed Matter, edited by, P. Lindner, and, T. Zemb, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002)
54. The so-called speckle visibility spectroscopy method introduced in Refs. and discussed briefly in the conclusions addresses the case where cI(t,0) fluctuates on the time scale of the CCD exposure time, because of dynamical heterogeneity.
55. To evaluate σÏμ2, we take a time series of dark images. To each dark image we then add, pixel-by-pixel, the intensity distribution of one single image of the speckle pattern scattered by the sample. In the series thus obtained, all images are identical, except for the small fluctuations due to Ïμp(t). This corresponds to what would be obtained for a perfectly frozen scatter, in the absence of all possible experimental artifacts, as discussed in Sec. 6. We process the data as usual and calculate the variance of cI. For all lags τ>0 the same value is obtained, which is taken as an estimate of σÏμ2.
56. F. Castro-Roman, G. Porte, and C. Ligoure, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.109 82, 109 (1999).
57. P. T. Tokumaru and P. E. Dimotakis, Exp. Fluids EXFLDU 0723-4864 10.1007/BF00192228 19, 1 (1995).
58. We neglect refractions at the solvent-container and container-air interfaces, since they only displace the beam parallel to itself.
59. G. Parry, Opt. Commun. OPCOB8 0030-4018 10.1016/0030-4018(95)00764-4 12, 75 (1974).
60. T. M. Lehmann, C. Gonner, and K. Spitzer, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging ITMID4 0278-0062 10.1109/42.816070 18, 1049 (1999).
61. H. Bissig, V. Trappe, S. Romer, and L. Cipelletti, cond-mat/0301265.
62. P. Ballesta, A. Duri, and L. Cipelletti (in preparation).
63. D. El Masri, M. Pierno, L. Berthier, and L. Cipelletti, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter JCOMEL 0953-8984 17, 53543 (2005).
64. P. K. Dixon and D. J. Durian, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.184302 90, 184302 (2003).
65. R. Bandyopadhyay, A. Gittings, S. Suh, P. Dixon, and D. J. Durian, Rev. Sci. Instrum. RSINAK 0034-6748 10.1063/1.2037987 76, 093110 (2005).
66. P. Habdas and E. R. Weeks, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. COCSFL 1359-0294 10.1016/S1359-0294(02)00049-3 7, 196 (2002).
67. L. Buisson, L. Bellon, and S. Ciliberto, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter JCOMEL 0953-8984 10.1088/0953-8984/15/11/336 15, S1163 (2003).
68. L. Bellon, L. Buisson, S. Ciliberto, and F. Vittoz, Rev. Sci. Instrum. RSINAK 0034-6748 10.1063/1.1499210 73, 3286 (2002).