From abortion to contraception in Europe

European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 229-236

  Kovacs L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Abortion; Contraception; Incidence and reasons; Recommendations

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; EUROPE; FAMILY PLANNING; FERTILITY; INCIDENCE; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIOECONOMICS;

EID: 0033502105     PISSN: 13625187     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13625189909071343     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. 1. The Alan Guttmacher Institute. Sharing Responsibility: Women, Society and Abortion Worldwide. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1999: 1-56
2. 2. The Szeged Declaration. Assessment of research and service needs on reproductive health in Eastern Europe - concerns and commitments. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 750-2
3. 3. Zhordonia Institute of Human Reproduction. From Abortion to Contraception. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office, 1991: 1-23
4. 4. Kovács L. Reproductive health in Eastern Europe. The outcome of data collection by questionnaire. In Johannisson E, Kovács L, Resch BA, Bruyniks NP, eds. Assessment of Research and Service Needs in Reproductive Health in Eastern Europe - Concerns and Commitments. New York: Parthenon Publishing, 1997; 149-64
5. 5. Kovács L. Abortion and contraceptive practices in Eastern Europe. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1997; 58: 69-75
6. 6. Mogilevkina I, Markote S, Avakyan Y, Mrochek L, Liljestrand J, Hellberg D. Induced abortions and childbirths: trends in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Russia, Belarussia and the Ukraine during 1970 to 1994. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 908-11
7. 7. Dolian G, Lüdicke F, Katchatrian N, Morabia A. Contraception and induced abortion in Armenia: a critical need for family planning programs in Eastern Europe. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 803-5
8. 8. Constantin A. Eight years pf experience in the first Romanian center of family planning and contraception. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 1999; 4: 57-60
9. 9. Munteanu J, Sidó SG, Alexandru P, Bureda V. A contraceptiv magatartás alakulása Temesváron 1989-90-ben. Magyar Nöorvosok Lapja 1992; 55: 165-6
10. 10. Herrman W, Wyss R, Riondel A, et al. Effect d'un stéroide antiprogesterone chez la femme: interruption du cycle menstrual et de la grossesse et débit. C R Acad Sci Paris 1982; 294: 933-8
11. 11. Kovács L, Sas M, Resch BA, et al. Termination of very early pregnancy by RU 486 - an antiprogestational compound. Contraception 1984; 29: 399-410
12. 12. Bygdeman M, Swahn ML. Progesterone receptor blockage. Effect on uterine contractility and early pregnancy. Contraception 1985; 32: 45-51
13. 13. Baird DT. Medical abortion in Britain. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 367-8
14. 14. Aubeni E. Methods of abortion in Europe during the first trimester of pregnancy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 1997; 2: 75-80
15. 15. Kovács L. Political and social influences on women's choices of fertility regulation. In Elstein M, ed. From Contraception to Reproductive Health Care. Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Publishing, 1995: 89-106
16. 16. Kovács L. Special problems relating to the wider introduction and use of contraceptive methods in Eastern Europe. In Kuhl H, Nicolov R, eds. Reevaluation of Contraceptive Steroids. Bad Blankenburg, Germany: Harfe Verlag, 1998: 45-50
17. 17. Kovács L. Contraception: current use and future perspectives. In Lindmark G, Horga M, Campana A, Kasonde J, eds. Towards Better Reproductive Health in Eastern Europe. Concern, Commitment and Change. Budapest, New York: Ceupress, 1999: 85-98
18. 18. Kovács L. The current situation of obstetrics and gynaecology in Central and Eastern Europe. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 1994; 16: 2163-6