Comparison of 6 and 7 French guiding catheters for percutaneous coronary intervention: Results of a randomised trial with a vascular ultrasound endpoint

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 528-534

  Juergens, Craig P ^a   Hallani, Hisham ^a   Leung, Dominic Y C ^a   Crozier, John A ^b   Robinson, Jacqui T C ^b   Lo, Sidney ^a   Hopkins, Andrew P ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Complications; Size

Indexed keywords

CLOPIDOGREL; CONTRAST MEDIUM; CREATINE KINASE; CREATINE KINASE MB; ENOXAPARIN; FIBRINOGEN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; HEMOGLOBIN; HEPARIN; PYRIDINE DERIVATIVE; THROMBIN; TICLOPIDINE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; ARTERY THROMBOSIS; ARTICLE; CATHETER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART INFARCTION; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETROPERITONEAL HEMATOMA; RETROPERITONEAL HEMORRHAGE; STENT; THROMBUS; VEIN THROMBOSIS;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 28844493435     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20534     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Wyman RM, Safian RD, Portway V, Skillman JJ, McKay RG, Baim DS. Current complications of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:1400-1406.
2. Moscucci M, Mansour KA, Kent KC, Kuntz RE, Senerchia C, Baim DS, Carrozza JP, Jr. Peripheral vascular complications of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting: predictors, management, and outcome. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:448-453.
3. Popma JJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Campbell A, Chuang YC, Clark C, Merritt AJ, Bucher TA, Leon MB. Vascular complications after balloon and new device angioplasty. Circulation 1993;88:1569-1578.
4. Danzi GB, Capuano C, Sesana M, Di Blasi A, Predolini S, Laterza C, Quaini E. A randomized comparison of the use of 4 and 6 French diagnostic catheters: the limits of downsizing. Int J Cardiol 2001;79:113-117.
5. Khoukaz S, Kern MJ, Bitar SR, Azrak E, Eisenhauer M, Wolford T, El-Shafei A. Coronary angiography using 4 Fr catheters with assisted power injection: a randomized comparison to 6 Fr manual technique and early ambulation. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:393-398.
6. Todd DM, Hubner PJ, Hudson N, Sarma J, McCance AJ, Caplin J. Multicentre, prospective, randomized trial of 4 vs. 6 French catheters in 410 patients undergoing coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2001;54:269-275.
7. Arora P, Naik N, Bahl VK, Mishra S, Yadav R, Sharma S, Manchanda SC. Coronary angiography using 4 French catheters with power injection: a randomized comparison with 6 French catheters. Indian Heart J 2002;54:184-188.
8. Hui WKK, Klinke WP, Kubac G, Talibi T. Comparison of 5F and 7/8F catheters for left ventricular and coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990;19:84-86.
9. Metz D, Meyer P, Touati C, Coste P, Petiteau PY, Durand P, Faivre R, Lefevre T, Elaerts J. Comparison of 6F with 7F and 8F guiding catheters for elective coronary angioplasty: results of a prospective, multicentre, randomized trail. Am Heart J 1997;134:131-137.
10. Talley JD, Wilkins C, Ciccone J, Hattel LJ. Comparison of 7 and 8 French guiding catheters for elective PTCA: results of a prospective randomized trial. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;33:205-211.
11. Talley JD, Mauldin PD, Becker ER. A prospective randomized trial comparing the benefits and limitations of 6 Fr and 8 Fr guiding catheters in elective coronary angioplasty. J Interv Cardiol 1995;8:345-353.
12. Applegate RJ, Grabarczyk MA, Little WC, Craven T, Walkup M, Kahl FR, Braden GA, Rankin KM, Kutcher MA. Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:78-83.
13. Johnson LW, Esente P, Giambartolomei A, Grant WD, Loin M, Reger MJ, Shaw C, Walford GD. Peripheral vascular complications of coronary angioplasty by the femoral and brachial techniques. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;31:165-172.
14. Muller DWM, Shamir KJ, Ellis SG, Topol EJ. Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous coronary interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:63-68.
15. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1269-1275.
16. Batchelor WB, Mahaffey KW, Berger PB, Deutsch E, Meier S, Hasselblad V, Fry ET, Teirstein PS, Ross AM, Binanay CA, et al, ATLAST trial investigators. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of enoxaparin after high risk coronary stenting: the ATLAST trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1608-1613.
17. Daoulah A, Segev A, Leblanc K, Chisholm RJ, Strauss BH. Postprocedural low molecular weight heparin in patients at high risk of subacute stent thrombosis. Cardiovasc Radiat Med 2003;4:182-185.
18. Juergens CP, Leung DYC, Crozier JA, Wong AM, Robinson JTC, Lo S, Kachwalla H, Hopkins AP. Patient tolerance and resource utilization associated with an arterial closure versus an external compression device after percutaneous coronary intervention. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:166-170.