Atypical cortical responses underlie poor speech perception in children using cochlear implants

NeuroReport

Volumn 16, Issue 18, 2005, Pages 2041-2045

  Gordon, Karen A ^a,b   Tanaka, Sho ^a,b   Papsin, Blake C ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Behavioral research; Deafness; Electrical stimulation; Evoked potential; Growth and development; Neuronal; Outcome assessment (health care); Pediatric; Plasticity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WAVEFORM;

AGE FACTORS; AUDITORY CORTEX; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 28844484125     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200512190-00015     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brainstem in children who use cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2003; 24:485-500.
2. Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A. The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res 2005; 203:134-143.
3. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Ear Hear 2004; 25:447-463.
4. Hughes ML, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Wolaver AA, Gervais JP. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear Hear 2000; 21:164-174.
5. Taitelbaum-Swead R, Kishon-Rabin L, Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, Kronenberg J, Hildesheimer M. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005 [Epub ahead of print].
6. Young NM, Grohne KM, Carrasco VN, Brown C. Speech perception of young children using nucleus 22-channel or CLARION cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1999; 177:99-103.
7. Stern RE, Yueh B, Lewis C, Norton S, Sie KC. Recent epidemiology of pediatric cochlear implantation in the United States: disparity among children of different ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Laryngoscope 2005; 115:125-131.
8. Geers A, Brenner C, Davidson L. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 2003; 24:24S-35S.
9. Hodges AV, Dolan Ash M, Balkany TJ, Schloffman JJ, Butts SL. Speech perception results in children with cochlear implants: contributing factors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 121:31-34.
10. Cullen RD, Buchman CA, Brown CJ, Copeland BJ, Zdanski C, Pillsbury HC 3rd, Shores CG. Cochlear implantation for children with GJB2-related deafness. Laryngoscope 2004; 114:1415-1419.
11. Sinnathuray AR, Toner JG, Geddis A, Clarke-Lyttle J, Patterson CC, Hughes AE. Auditory perception and speech discrimination after cochlear implantation in patients with connexin 26 (GJB2) gene-related deafness. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25:930-934.
12. Zwolan TA, Ashbaugh CM, Alarfaj A, Kileny PR, Arts HA, El-Kashlan HK, Telian SA. Pediatric cochlear implant patient performance as a function of age at implantation. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25:112-120.
13. Manrique M, Cervera-Paz FJ, Huarte A, Molina M. Advantages of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf children before 2 years of age when compared with later implantation. Laryngoscope 2004; 114:1462-1469.
14. McConkey Robbins A, Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kishon-Rabin L. Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory skill development in infants and toddlers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130:570-574.
15. Nikolopoulos TP, Gibbin KP, Dyar D. Predicting speech perception outcomes following cochlear implantation using Nottingham children's implant profile (NChIP). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68:137-141.
16. El-Hakim H, Abdolell M, Mount RJ, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Influence of age at implantation and of residual hearing on speech outcome measures after cochlear implantation: binary partitioning analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 189:102-108.
17. Dowell RC, Dettman SJ, Hill K, Winton E, Barker EJ, Clark GM. Speech perception outcomes in older children who use multichannel cochlear implants: older is not always poorer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 189:97-101.
18. Gray RF, Jones SE, Court I. Cochlear implantation for progressive hearing loss. Arch Dis Child 2003; 88:708-711.
19. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children. Hear Res 2005; 204:78-89.
20. Lee DS, Lee JS, Oh SH, Kim S-K, Kim J-W, Chung J-K, et al. Deafness: cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants. Nature 2001; 409:149-150.
21. Sharma A, Dorman MF, Spahr AJ. Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear implantation. Neuroreport 2002; 13:1365-1368.
22. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ. Of kittens and kids: altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiol Neurootol 2001; 6:363-380.
23. Jeong Lee H, Kang E, Oh SH, Kang H, Soo Lee D, Chul Lee M, Kim CS. Preoperative differences of cerebral metabolism relate to the outcome of cochlear implants in congenitally deaf children. Hear Res 2005; 203:2-9.
24. Jellema T, Brunia CH, Wadman WJ. Sequential activation of microcircuits underlying somatosensory-evoked potentials in rat neocortex. Neuroscience 2004; 129:283-295.