Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 24, Issue 1 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Geers, Ann ^a,b,c,e   Brenner, Chris ^a,d   Davidson, Lisa ^a  

^a CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^d Moog Center for Deaf Education   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DYNAMICS; EDUCATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ELECTRODE; FAMILY SIZE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTELLIGENCE; LIP READING; LOUDNESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH DEVELOPMENT; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH REHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 0037325781     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000051687.99218.0f     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bamford, J., & Wilson, I. (1979). Methodological considerations and practical aspects of the BKB sentence lists. In J. Bench & J. M. Bamford (Eds.), Speech-Hearing Tests and The Spoken Language of Hearing Impaired Children. London: Academic Press.
2. Blamey, P. J., Pyman, B. C., Gordon, M. Clark, G., Brown, A. M., Dowell, R. C., & Hollow, R. D. (1992). Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlingually deafened cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology, 101, 342-348.
3. Blamey, P. J., Sarant, J. Z., Paatsch, L. E., Barry, J. G., Bow, C. P., Wales, R. J., Wright, M., Psarros, C., Rattign, K., & Tooher, R. (2001). Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 264-285.
4. Boothroyd, A. (1993). Profound deafness and cochlear implants. In R. S. Tyler (ED.) Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations (pp. 1-33). San Diego: Singular.
5. Boothroyd, A. (1995). Speech perception tests and hearing impaired children. In G. Plant & K. E. Spens (Eds.), Profound Deafness and Speech Communication (pp. 345-371). London: Whurr.
6. Boothroyd, A. (1997). Video Game Test of Speech Pattern Contrast Perception. New York: Graduate Center, City University of New York.
7. Boothroyd, A., & Eran, O. (1994). Auditory speech perception capacity of child implant users expressed as equivalent hearing loss. Volta Review, 96, 151-168.
8. Boothroyd, A., Geers, A., & Moog, J. (1991). Practical implications of cochlear implants in children. Ear and Hearing, 12 (Suppl.), 81-89.
9. Davidson, L., Brenner, C., & Geers, A. (2000). Predicting speech perception benefit from loudness growth measures and other map characteristics of the Nucleus 22 implant. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology, 109, 56-58.
10. Dorman, M. F., Loizou., P. C., Kemp, L. L., & Kirk, K. (2000). Word recognition by children listening to speech processed into a small number of channels: Data from normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 21, 590-596.
11. Dorman, M., Loizou, P., & Rainey, D. (1997). Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2403-2411.
12. Dowell, R. C., Blamey, P. J., & Clark, G. M. (1995). Potential and limitations of cochlear implants in children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 104 (Part 2, Suppl. 166), 324-327.
13. Geers, A. E., & Brenner, C. (2003). Background and educational characteristics of prelingually deaf children implanted by 5 years of age. Ear and Hearing, 24 (Suppl.), 2S-14S.
14. Geers, A. E., Brenner, C., & Davidson, L. S. (1999). Speech perception changes in children switching from M-Peak to SPEAK Coding strategy. In S. B. Waltzman & N. Cohen (Eds.), Cochlear Implants (p. 211). New York: Thieme Publications.
15. Geers, A., & Moog, J. (1994). Effectiveness of cochlear implants and tactile aids for deaf children: The sensory aids study at Central Institute for the Deaf. Volta Review, 96, 5.
16. Geier, L. L., & Norton, S. J. (1992). The effects of limiting the number of Nucleus 22 cochlear implant electrodes programmed on speech perception. Ear and Hearing, 13, 340-348.
17. Kileny, P., Zimmerman-Phillips, S., & Kemink, J. (1992). Effects of active channel number and place of stimulation on performance with multichannel implant. American Journal of Otology, 13, 117.
18. Kirk, K. I., Pisoni, D. B., & Osberger, M. J. (1995). Lexical effects of spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 16, 470-481.
19. Loizou, P. C., Dorman, M., & Fitzke, J. (2000). The effect of reduced dynamic range on speech understanding: implications for patients with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 21, 25-31.
20. Meyer, T. A., Svirsky, M. A., Kirk, K. I., & Miyamoto, R. T. (1998). Improvement in speech perception by children with profound prelingual hearing loss: Effects of device, communication mode and chronological age. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41, 846-858.
21. Miyamoto, R. T., Osberger, M. J., & Todd, S. L. (1994). Speech perception skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants. In I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer & E. S. Hochmair (Eds.), Advances in Cochlear Implants (pp. 498-504). Wien: Manz.
22. Moog, J. S., & Geers, A. E. (1990). Early Speech Perception Test For Profoundly Deaf Children. St. Louis: Central Institute for the Deaf.
23. Osberger, M. J., Robbins, A., Todd, S., Riley, A., Kirk, K., & Carney, A. (1996). Cochlear implants and tactile aids for children with profound hearing impairment. In F. Bess, J. Gravel, & A. M. Tharpe (Eds.), Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits (pp. 283-308). Nashville, TN: Bill Wilkerson Center Press.
24. Ross, M., & Lerman, P. (1971). Word Intelligibility By Picture Identification. Pittsburgh: Stanwix House.
25. Sehgal, S. T., Kirk, K. I., Svirsky, M., & Miyamoto, R. T. (1998). The effects of processor strategy on the speech perception performance of pediatric Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 19, 149-161.
26. Skinner, M., Fourakis, M., Holden, T., Holden, L., & Demorest, M. (1996). Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies, Ear and Hearing, 17, 182-197.
27. Skinner, M. W., Holden, L. K., Holden, T. A., & Demorest, M. (1999). Comparison of two methods for selecting minimum stimulation levels used in programming the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 42, 814-828.
28. Strube, M. J. (2003). Statistical analysis and interpretation in a study of prelingually deaf children implanted before five years of age. Ear and Hearing, 24 (Suppl.), 15S-23S.
29. Tye-Murray, N., & Geers, A. (2001). Children's Audio-Visual Enhancement Test. St. Louis: Central Institute for the Deaf.
30. Tyler, R. S., Gantz, B. J., Woodworth, G. G., Fryauf-Bertschy, H., & Kelsay, D. M. (1997). Performance of 2- and 3-year old children and prediction of 4-year from 1-year performance. American Journal of Otology, 18, S157-S159.
31. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale For Children (3rd Edition). San Antonio: Psychological Corp. Harcourt Brace.