Selection in the wrkplace: Whose rights prevail?

Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-13

  Connerley, Mary L ^a   Arvey, Richard D ^b   Gilliland, Stephen W ^c   Mael, Fred A ^d   Paetzold, Ramona L ^e   Sackett, Paul R ^f  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^d AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

^e TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Privacy rights; Selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 28844473544     PISSN: 08927545     EISSN: 15733378     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1014466023589     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arvey, R. D., & Sackett, P. R. (1993). Fairness in selection: Current developments and perspectives. In Schmitt, N., & Borman, W. (Eds.), Personnel Selection, 171-202. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Connerley, M. L., Mael, F. A., & Morath, R. A. (1999). "Don't ask-please tell": Incumbent need to know and applicant privacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 405-422.
3. Ganft, L. (1995). An affront to human dignity: Electronic mail monitoring in the workplace. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 8, 345.
4. Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection system: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694-734.
5. Gilliland, S. W., & Steiner, D. D. (2001). Causes and consequences of applicant fairness. In Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace, Vol. 2, 175-195. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Goldman, B. M. (2001). Toward an understanding of employment discrimination claiming: An integration of organizational justice and social information processing theories. Personnel Psychology, 54, 361-386.
7. Hubbartt, W. S. (1998). The New Battle Over Workplace Privacy. AMACOM: New York.
8. Levy, M. (1995). The electronic monitoring of workers: Privacy in the age of the electronic sweatshop. Legal Reference Service Quarterly, 14, 5.
9. Mael, F. A. (1998). Privacy and personnel selection: Reciprocal rights and responsibilities. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 11, 187-214.
10. Mishra, J. M., & Crampton, S. M. (1998). Employee monitoring: Privacy in the workplace? S. A. M. Advanced Management Journal, 63(3), 4-14.
11. Paetzold, R. L., & Willborn, S. L. (1992). Employer (ir)rationality and the demise of employment references. American Business Law Journal, 30, 123-142.
12. Peterson, D. (1992). Dayton's apologizes, pays black university official. Minneapolis Star-Tribune, March 13, Metro News Section, 01 A.
13. Rolnick, A. (1998). Applicant selection tests: Decision-making tools or direct path to litigation? Bobbin, 39(12), 74-76.
14. Rothfeder, J., & Galen, M. (1990). Is your boss spying on you? Business Week, Jan. 15, 74-75.
15. Ryan, K. D., & Oestreich, D. K. (1991). Driving Fear Out of the Workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Rynes, S. L., & Connerley, M. L. (1993). Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 261-211.
17. Solomon, R. C. (1992). Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Soroka v. Dayton Hudson Corp., 1 Cal.Rpfr.2d 77 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 1991).
19. Tsui, A. S., & Milkovich, G. T. (1987). Personnel department activities: Constituency perspectives and preferences. Personnel Psychology, 40, 519-537.
20. Yunker v. Honeywell, Inc., 496 N. W. 2d 419 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993).