PI and PID controllers tuning for integral-type servo systems to ensure robust stability and controller robustness

Electrical Engineering

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 149-156

  Precup, Radu Emil ^a   Preitl, Stefan ^a  

^a POLITEHNICA UNIVERSITY OF TIMISOARA   (Romania)

Author keywords

Controller robustness; Extended symmetrical optimum method; PI controllers; PID controllers; Robust stability

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SERVOMECHANISMS;

CONTROLLER ROBUSTNESS; EXTENDED SYMMETRICAL OPTIMUM METHOD; PI CONTROLLERS; PID CONTROLLERS;

THREE TERM CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 28844450242     PISSN: 09487921     EISSN: 14320487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00202-004-0269-8     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Åström KJ, Hägglund T (1995) PID controllers theory: design and tuning, 2nd edn. Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park, NC
2. Preitl S, Precup RE (1999) An extension of tuning relations after symmetrical optimum method for PI and PID controllers. Automatica 35:1731-1736
3. Bodson M (2003) Reconfigurable nonlinear autopilot. J Guid Contr Dynam 26:719-727
4. Ho MT, Wang HS (2003) PID controller design with guaranteed gain and phase margins. Asian J Contr 5:374-381
5. Silva GJ, Datta A, Bhattacharyya SP (2003) On the stability and controller robustness of some popular PID tuning rules. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 48:1638-1641
6. Keel LH, Bhattacharyya SP (1997) Robust, fragile or optimal? IEEE Trans Automat Contr 42:1098-1105
7. Kharitonov VL (1979) Asymptotic stability of an equilibrium position of a family of systems of linear differential equations. Differential Equations 14:1483-1485
8. Anderson BDO, Jury EI, Mansour M (1987) On robust Hurwitz polynomials. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 32:909-913
9. Kessler C (1958) Das symmetrische Optimum. Regelungstechnik 6:395-400, 432-436
10. Loron L (1997) Tuning of PID controllers by the non-symmetrical optimum method. Automatica 33:103-107