Simulation in cardiology and cardiothoracic and vascular surgery

Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 325-333

  Lake, Carol L ^a  

^a Verefi Technologies Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOPLASTY; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORONARY ARTERY SURGERY; CURRICULUM; DEVICE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; MULTICENTER STUDY; REVIEW; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; TEAMWORK; THORAX SURGERY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CARDIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRISIS INTERVENTION; HUMANS; MANIKINS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; THORACIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 28844447816     PISSN: 10892532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/108925320500900405     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Gordon MS, Ewy GA, Felner JM, et al: Teaching bedside cardiology examination skills using "Harvey" the cardiology patient simulator. Med Clin North Am 64:305-313, 1980.
2. Ewy GA, Felner JM, Juul D, et al: Test of a cardiology patient simulator with students in fourth year electives. J Med Educ 62:738-743, 1987.
3. Issenberg SB, Gordon MS, Gordon DL, et al: Simulation and new learning technologies. Med Teach 23:16-23, 2001.
4. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al: Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 282:861-866, 1999.
5. Takashina T, Shimizu M, Katayama H: A new cardiology patient simulator. Cardiology 88:408-413, 1997.
6. Gallagher AG, Cates CU: Approval of virtual reality training for carotid stenting. What this means for procedural-based medicine. JAMA 292:3024-3026, 2004.
7. http://www.medsimulation.com/. Accessed 8/18/05.
8. Loyd GE, Lake CL, Greenberg, RB: Practical Health Care Simulation. Philadelphia: Hanley Belfus (Elsevier) 2004, p 341-354.
9. Haluck RS, Krummel TM: Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century. Arch Surg 135:786-792, 2000.
10. Sachdeva AK: Acquiring skills in new procedures and technology: The challenge and the opportunity. Arch Surg 140:387-389, 2005.
11. Haluck RS: Design considerations for computer-based surgical simulators. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 2005, in press.
12. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, et al: Virtual reality simulation for the operating room. Proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241:364-372, 2005.
13. Kneebone R: Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: A theory-based approach. Acad Med 80:549-553, 2005.
14. Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Maass H, et al: A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg 241:442-449, 2005.
15. Dawson SL: A critical approach to medical simulation. Bull Am Coll Surg 87:12-18, 2002.
16. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT). Taylor and Frances Ltd, Oxon, UK. www.tandf.co.uk/journals.
17. Fried MP, Satava R, Weghorst S, et al: Identifying and reducing errors with surgical simulation. Qual Saf Health Care 13:i19-i26, 2004.
18. Lake CL: Simulation in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia: Tool or toy? Semin Cardiothorac Vase Anesth 9:265-274, 2005.
19. Taffinder N, Sutton C, Fishwick RJ: Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: Results from randomized controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 50:124-130, 1998.
20. Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S, et al: Virtual reality training improves operating room performance. Ann Surg 236:458-464, 2002.
21. Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamovicz M, et al: Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175:482-487, 1998.
22. Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH, et al: The effect of practice on performance in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endo 12:1117-1120, 1998.
23. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, et al: Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518-528, 2004.
24. Haluck RS, Gallagher AG, Satava RM, et al: Reliability and validity of Endo Tower, a virtual reality trainer for angled endoscope navigation. Stud Health Technol Inform 85:179-184, 2002.
25. Pham T, Roland L, Benson KA, et al: Smart Tutor: A pilot study of a novel adaptive simulation environment. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2005 Abstracts of annual meeting.
26. Webster R, Haluck RS, Zoppeti G, et al: A haptic surgical simulator for laparoscopic cholecystectomy using real-time deformable organs. Proc IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, June 25-27, 2003, Salzburg, Austria.
27. Ogan K, Jacomides L, Shulman MJ, et al: Virtual ureteroscopy predicts ureteroscopic proficiency of medical students on a cadaver. J Urol 172:669-671, 2004.
28. http://www.medicalsim.org/virgil.htm. Accessed 8/13/05.
29. Nakao M, Oyama H, Komori M, et al: Haptic reproduction and interactive visualization of a beating heart for cardiovascular surgery simulation. Int J Med Inform 68:155-163, 2002.
30. Kennedy CW, Hu T, Desai JP, et al: A novel approach to robotic cardiac surgery using haptics and visions. Cardiovasc Engineering. An International Journal 2:15-22, 2002.
31. Jacobs S, Holzhey D, Kiali BB, et al: Limitations for manual and telemanipulator-assisted motion tracking: Implications for endoscopic beating-heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 76:2029-2035, 2003.
32. Kitagata M, Dokko D, Okamura MM, et al: Effect of sensory substitution on suture manipulation forces for surgical teleoperation. Stud Health Technol Inform 98:157-163, 2004.
33. Mierdl S, Byhahn C, Dogan S, et al: Segmental wall motion abnormalities during telerobotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 94:774-780, 2002.
34. Yuh DD, Simon BA, Fernandez-Bustamente A, et al: Totally endoscopic robot-assisted transmyocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130:120-124, 2005.
35. Bodner J, Wykypiel H, Greiner A, et al: Early experience with robot-assisted surgery for mediastinal masses. Ann Thorac Surg 78:259-266, 2004.
36. Coste-Maniere E, Adhami L, Mourgues F, Carpentier A: Planning, simulation, and augmented reality for robotic cardiac procedures: The STARS system of the ChIR team. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 15:141-156, 2003.
37. Jones BA, Krueger S, Howell D, et al: Robotic mitral valve repair. Tex Heart Inst J 32:143-146, 2005.
38. Tatooles AJ, Pappas PS, Gordon PJ, et al: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using the da Vinci robotic-system. Ann Thorac Surg 77:1978-1984, 2004.
39. Nifong LW, Chu VF, Bailey BM, et al: Robotic mitral valve repair: Experience with the da Vinci system. Ann Thorac Surg 75:438-443, 2003.
40. Talamini MA, Hanly EJ: Technology in the operating suite. JAMA 293:863-866, 2005.
41. Hanly EJ, Marohn MR, Bachman SL, et al: Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the da Vinci surgical system. Am J Surg 187:309-315, 2004.
42. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker S, et al: Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. Br Med J 327:1032-1037, 2003.
43. Aggarwal R, Undre S, Moorthy K, et al: The simulated operating theatre: Comprehensive training for surgical teams. Qual Saf Health Care 13:i27-i32, 2004.
44. Haluck RS, Krummel TM: Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century. Arch Surg 135:786-792, 2000.
45. Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N: Assessing operative skill. Brit Med J 318:887-888, 1999.
46. Haluck RS, Marshall RL, Krummel TM, Melkonian MG: Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2001;193:660-665.