Design considerations for computer-based surgical simulators

Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies

Volumn 14, Issue 4-5, 2005, Pages 235-243

  Haluck, Randy S ^a  

^a PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Education; Haptics; Human factors; Simulation; Training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ENGINEERING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SIMULATOR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 27744432131     PISSN: 13645706     EISSN: 13652931     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645700500244222     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, et al. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: Proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg. 2005;241:364-72.
2. Bernstein DA, Clarke-Steward A, Roy EJ, Wickens CD. Psychology. 4th Edition. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1997.
3. Whitman N, Lawrence P. Surgical teaching: Practice makes perfect. 1st Edition. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah; 1991.
4. Grunwald T, Clark D, Fisher SS, McLaughlin M, et al. Using cognitive task analysis to facilitate collaboration in development of simulator to accelerate surgical training. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;98:114-20.
5. Lewandoski WE. Performing a Task Analysis - The critical step in creating a simulation that improves human performance. [abstract]. In: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12th Annual Meeting: Building a better you: The next tools for medical education, diagnosis and care. January 13-24, 2004, Newport Beach, CA
6. Risucci DA, Wolfe KC. Imporving the educational efficacy of simulators: Validation of minimally invasive surgery simulators for training and assessment. Laparoscopy Today. 2005;4:19-22.
7. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458-63; discussion 463-4.
8. Desmond PA, Hancock PA. Active and Passive Fatigue States. In: Hancock PA, Desmond PA, editors. Stress, Workload, and Fatigue. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2001. pp 455-65.
9. Druckman D, Bjork RA. In the mind's eye: Enhancing human performance. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1991. p 28.
10. Kurtzer I, Dizio PA, Lackner JR. Adaptation to a novel multiforce environment. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Apr 16; [Epub ahead of print].
11. Haluck RS. Haptics in Surgical Simulators. In Murray WB Haptic applications for medical simulation: State of the Art. United States Army Simulation and Instrumentation Control Report N61339-99-3-0002. November 25, 2000.
12. Haluck RS, Gallagher AG, Satava RM, Webster R, et al. Reliability and validity of Endotower, a virtual reality trainer for angled endoscope navigation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:179-84.
13. Schmidt RA. Motor learning and performance: From principles to practice. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics Book. 1991. Chapter 7: Motor learning: Concepts and Methods; pp 151-70.
14. Mager R-F. Preparing instructional objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction. 3rd Edition. Atlanta: Center for Effective Performance, Inc.; 1997.
15. Larsson O, Sjodin F. Minimally invasive surgical simulators - the end-users' perspective. [Master Thesis] Department of Psychology, Umea University 2003. Umea, Sweden.
16. Haluck RS, Marshall RL, Krummel TM, Melkonian MG. Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Dec;193:660-5.
17. Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R, Neumann PF, Dawson SL, et al. Construct and face validity of three laparoscopic simulators: MIST-VR, Endotower, and CELTS [poster S092]. In: SAGES 2005 Scientific Session and Postgraduate Courses; 2005 April 13-16; Fort Lauderdale, Florida. p 42.
18. Champion H, Higgins G. The Military Simulation Experience: Charting the Vision for Simulation Training in Combat Trauma. TATRC Report No. 01-03x. U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5012. http://www.tatrc.org
19. Gandsas A, Adrales GL, Park AE. Simulation in General Surgery. In: Loyd GE, Lake CL, Greenberg RB, editors. Practical health care simulations. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2004. pp 341-52.
20. National Library of Medicine (National Institute of Health). Visible human project. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/visible/visible_human.htmls