Life history affects the evolution of reproductive isolation among species of Coreopsis (Asteraceae)

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 2362-2369

  Archibald, Jenny K ^a,b   Mort, Mark E ^a   Crawford, Daniel J ^a   Kelly, John K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coreopsis; Divergence; Life history; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; LIFE HISTORY; PHYLOGENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

ASTERACEAE; COREOPSIS;

EID: 28644442583     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00946.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Andreasen, K., and B. G. Baldwin. 2001. Unequal evolutionary rates between annual and perennial lineages of checker mallows (Sidalcea, Malvaceae): evidence from 18S-26S rDNA internal and external transcribed spacers. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:936-944.
2. Bousquet, J., S. H. Strauss, A. H. Doerksen, and R. A. Price. 1992. Extensive variation in evolutionary rate of rbcL gene-sequences among seed plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89:7844-7848.
3. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
4. _. 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-303.
5. _. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
6. Crawford, D. J., and M. E. Mort. 2005. Phylogeny of eastern North American Coreopsis (Asteraceae-Coreopsideae): insights from nuclear and plastid sequences and comments on character evolution. Am. J. Bot. 92:330-336.
7. Dobzhansky, T. H. 1936. Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21:113-135.
8. Doebeli, M., U. Dieckmann, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz. 2005. What we have also learned: adaptive speciation is theoretically plausible. Evolution 59:691-695.
9. Edmands, S. 2002. Does parental divergence predict reproductive compatibility? Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:520-527.
10. Fishman, L., and J. H. Willis. 2001. Evidence for Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilites contributing to the sterility of hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. Evolution 55:1932-1942.
11. Fitzpatrick, B. M. 2002. Molecular correlates of reproductive isolation. Evolution 56:191-198.
12. Gaut, B. S., S. V. Muse, W. D. Clark, and M. T. Clegg. 1992. Relative rates of nucleotide substitution at the rbcL locus of monocotyledonous plants. J. Mol. Evol. 35:292-303.
13. Gaut, B. S., B. R. Morton, B. C. McCaig, and M. T. Clegg. 1996. Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene Adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:10274-10279.
14. Gavrilets, S. 2005. "Adaptive speciation" - it is not that easy: a reply to Doebeli et al. Evolution 59:696-699.
15. Gottlieb, L. D. 1974. Genetic confirmation of the origin of Clarkia lingulata. Evolution 28:244-250.
16. Grant, V. 1981. Plant speciation. 2nd ed. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
17. Haldane, J. B. S. 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in animal hybrids. J. Genet. 12:101-109.
18. Kearns, C. A., and D. W. Inouye. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, CO.
19. Kelly, J. K., A. Rasch, and S. Kalisz. 2002. A method to estimate pollen viability from pollen size variation. Am. J. Bot. 89:1021-1023.
20. Kimball, R. T., and D. J. Crawford. 2004. Phylogeny of Coreopsideae (Asteraceae) using ITS sequences suggests lability in reproductive characters. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33:127-139.
21. Laroche, J., and J. Bousquet. 1999. Evolution of the mitochondrial rps3 intron in perennial and annual angiosperme and homology to nad5 intron 1. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:441-452.
22. Laroche, J., P. Li, L. Maggia, and J. Bousquet. 1997. Molecular evolution of angiosperm mitochondrial introns and exons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:5722-5727.
23. Magallón, S. A. 2004. Dating lineages: molecular and paleontological approaches to the temporal framework of clades. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165:S7-S21.
24. Mendelson, T. C., B. D. Inouye, and M. D. Rausher. 2004. Quantifying patterns in the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 58:1424-1433.
25. Mort, M. E., D. J. Crawford, and K. N. Fairfield. 2004. Phylogeny and character evolution in California Coreopsis (Asteraceae): insights from morphology and from sequences of the nuclear and plastid genomes. Syst. Bot. 29:781-789.
26. Moyle, L. C., M. S. Olson, and P. Tiffin. 2004. Patterns of reproductive isolation in three angiosperm genera. Evolution 58:1195-1208.
27. Muller, H. J. 1939. Reversibility in evolution considered from the standpoint of genetics. Biol. Rev. 14:185-268.
28. Orr, H. A. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139:1805-1813.
29. Orr, H. A., and M. Turelli. 2001. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55:1085-1094.
30. Parks, C. R., N. G. Miller, J. F. Wendel, and K. M. McDougal. 1983. Genetic-divergence within the genus Liriodendron (Magnoliaceae). Ann. MO. Bot. Gard. 70:658-666.
31. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
32. Presgraves, D. C. 2002. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56:1168-1183.
33. Sanderson, M. J., J. L. Thorne, N. Wikstrom, and K. Bremer. 2004. Molecular evidence on plant divergence times. Am. J. Bot. 91:1656-1665.
34. Sasa, M. M., P. T. Chippindale, and N. A. Johnson. 1998. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 52:1811-1820.
35. Smith, E. B. 1974. Coreopsis nuecensis (Compositae) and a related new species from southern Texas. Brittonia 26:161-171.
36. _. 1976. A biosystematic survey of Coreopsis in eastern United States and Canada. Sida 6:123-215.
37. _. 1982. Phyletic trends in section Coreopsis of the genus Coreopsis (Compositae). Bot. Gaz. 143:121-124.
38. _. 1983. Phyletic trends in sections Eublepharis and Calliopsis of the genus Coreopsis (Compositae). Am. J. Bot. 70:549-554.
39. _. 1984. Biosystematic study and typification of Californian Coreopsis (Compositae) sections Tuckermannia, Pugiopappus and Euleptosyne. Sida 10:276-289.
40. Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
41. _. 1982. Plant speciation. Pp. 21-39 in C. Barigozzi, ed. Mechanisms of speciation. Alan R. Liss, New York.
42. Swofford, D. L. 2003. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Ver. 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
43. Whittle, C. A., and M. O. Johnston. 2003. Broad-scale analysis contradicts the theory that generation time affects molecular evolutionary rates in plants. J. Mol. Evol. 56:223-233.
44. Wiens, J. J. 2004. What is speciation and how should we study it? Am. Nat. 163:914-923.
45. Wilson, A. C., S. S. Carlson, and T. J. White. 1977. Biochemical evolution. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 46:573-639.