ISSUES IN THE IDENTIFICATION OF LEARNING DISABILITIES

Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities

Volumn 16, Issue , 2003, Pages 1-36

  Scruggs, Thomas E ^a   Mastropieri, Margo A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28444496999     PISSN: 0735004X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-004X(03)16001-6     Document Type: Review

References (141)

1. P.G. Aaron The impending demise of the discrepancy formula Review of Educational Research 67 1997 461 502
2. P.T. Ackerman C.A. Holloway P.L. Youngdahl R.A. Dykman The double-deficit of reading disability does not fit all Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 16 2001 152 160
3. R. Algozzine Low achiever differentiation: Where’s the beef? Exceptional Children 52 1985 72 75
4. R. Algozzine L. Korinek Where is special education for students with high prevalence handicaps going? Exceptional Children 51 1985 388 394
5. R. Algozzine J.E. Ysseldyke In defense of different numbers Remedial and Special Education 8 1987 53 56
6. R. Algozzine J.E. Ysseldyke M. McGue Differentiating low-achieving students: Thoughts on setting the record straight Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 10 1995 140 144
7. G.R. Alley D.D. Deshler M.M. Warner Identification of learning disabled adolescents: A Bayesian approach Learning Disability Quarterly 2 1979 83 86
8. J.H. Allor The relationships of phonemic awareness and rapid naming to reading development Learning Disability Quarterly 25 2002 47 57
9. Al-Otaiba, S. D. (2000). Children who do not respond to early literacy intervention: A longitudinal study across kindergarten and first grade. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.
10. S.D. Al-Otaiba D. Fuchs Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature Remedial and Special Education 23 2002 300 316
11. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Text Revision. Washington, DC: Author.
12. P.L. Anderson R. Meier-Hedde Early case reports of dyslexia in the United States and Europe Journal of Learning Disabilities 34 2001 9 21
13. Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1991). A cognitive approach to assessing the mathematical difficulties of children labeled “learning disabled.” In: H. L. Swanson (Ed.), Handbook on the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 177–228). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
14. Beirne-Smith, M., Ittenbach, R. F., & Patton, J. R. (2002). Mental retardation (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
15. J.H. Beitchman D.P. Cantwell S.R. Forness K.A. Kavale J.M. Kauffman Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with language and learning disorders Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 37 Supplement 1998 46S 62S
16. Berlin, R. (1887). Fine besondre art der worstblindheit: Dyslexia [A special type of wordblindness: Dyslexia]. Wiesbaden: Bergmann.
17. Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (1994). Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond aptitude – achievement discrepancies to failure to respond to validated treatment protocols. In: G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues (pp. 163–183). Baltimore: Brookes.
18. Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Hallahan, D. P. (Eds) (2002). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Christensen, C. A. (1999). Learning disability: Issues of representation, power, and the medicalization of school failure. In: R. J. Sternberg & L. Spear-Swerling (Eds), Perspectives on Learning Disabilities: Biological, Cognitive, Contextual (pp. 227–249). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20. Coles, G. S. (1987). The learning mystique: A critical look at learning disabilities . New York: Pantheon.
21. T.E. Cone L.R. Wilson Quantifying a severe discrepancy: A critical analysis Learning Disability Quarterly 4 1981 359 371
22. Cooney, J. B., & Swanson, H. L. (1987). Memory and learning disabilities: An overview. In: H. L. Swanson (Ed.), Memory and Learning Disabilities: Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities (Supplement 2, pp. 1–40). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
23. M. Coutinho Who will be learning disabled after the reauthorization of IDEA? Two very distinct perspectives Journal of Learning Disabilities 28 1995 664 668
24. R.M. Dawes D. Faust P.E. Meehl Clinical versus actuarial judgment Science 243 1989 1668 1674
25. Dejerine, J. (1892). Contribution a l’etude anatomo-pathologique et clinique des differentes varietes de cecite verbale. Memoriale Societe Biologique , Fev. 27, pp. 61–63.
26. T.G. Finlan Do state methods of quantifying a severe discrepancy result in fewer students with learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly 15 1992 129 135
27. Fleischner, J. E. (1994). Diagnosis and assessment of mathematics learning disabilities. In: G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues (pp. 441–458). Baltimore: Brookes.
28. Fletcher, J. M., & Foorman, B. R. (1994). Issues in definition and measurement of learning disabilities: The need for early intervention. In: G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues (pp. 185–200). Baltimore: Brookes.
29. J.M. Fletcher D.J. Francis S.E. Shaywitz G.R. Lyon B.R. Foorman K.K. Stuebing B.A. Shaywitz Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 13 1998 186 203
30. Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Barnes, M., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Olson, R. K., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation. In: R. Bradley, L. Danielson & D. P. Hallahan (Eds), Identification of Learning Disabilities: Research to Practice (pp. 185–250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. J.M. Fletcher S.E. Shaywitz D.P. Shankweiler L. Katz I.Y. Liberman K.K. Stuebing D.J. Francis A.E. Fowler B.A. Shaywitz Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions Journal of Educational Psychology 86 1994 6 23
32. W. Frankenberger K. Fronzaglio A review of states’ criteria and procedures for identifying children with learning disabilities Journal of Learning Disabilities 24 1991 495 500
33. L.S. Fuchs D. Fuchs Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 13 1998 204 220
34. L.S. Fuchs D. Fuchs C.L. Hamlett N.B. Phillips J. Bentz Classwide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity Exceptional Children 60 1994 518 527
35. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Lipsey, M. W. (2000). Reading differences between low-achieving students with and without learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. In: R. Gersten, E. P. Schiller & S. Vaughn (Eds), Contemporary Special Education Research: Syntheses of the Knowledge Base on Critical Instructional Issues (pp. 81–105). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. L.S. Fuchs D. Fuchs D.L. Speece Treatment validity as a unifying construct for identifying learning disabilities Learning Disability Quarterly 25 2002 33 45
37. Galaburda, A. (1991). Anatomy of dyslexia: Argument against phrenology. In: D. D. Duane & D. B. Gray (Eds), The Reading Brain (pp. 119–131). Pankton, MD: York Press.
38. Gallagher, J. J. (1966). Children with developmental imbalances: A psychoeducational definition. In: W. Cruickshank (Ed.), The Teacher of Brain-Injured Children (pp. 20–34). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
39. R.H. Good D.C. Simmons S.B. Smith Effective academic interventions in the United States: Evaluating and enhancing the acquisition of early reading skills School Psychology Review 27 1998 56 70
40. J. Gottlieb M. Alter B.W. Botlieb J. Wishner Special education in urban America: It’s not justifiable for many Journal of Special Education 27 1994 453 465
41. Gresham, F. (August, 2001). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the U.S. Department of Education LD Summit, Washington, DC.
42. Hallahan, D. P. (2002). Learning disabilities: Historical perspectives. In: R. Bradley, L. Danielson & D. P. Hallahan (Eds), Identification of Learning Disabilities: Research to Practice (pp. 1–67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Hallahan, D. P., & Cottone, E. A. (1997). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In: T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds), Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities (Vol. 11, pp. 27–68). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
44. Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Lloyd, J. W. (1999). Introduction to learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
45. D.P. Hallahan C.E. Keller D.W. Ball A comparison of prevalence rate variability from state to state for each of the categories of special education Remedial and Special Education 7 1986 8 14
46. K.A. Haring D.L. Lovett K.F. Haney B. Algozzine D.D. Smith J. Clarke Labeling pre-schoolers as learning disabled: A cautionary position Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 12 1992 151 173
47. J. Hinshelwood A case of dyslexia: A peculiar form of word-blindness Lancet 2 1896 1451 1454
48. Hinshelwood, J. (1917). Congenital word-blindness . London: H.K. Lewis.
49. W.F. Horn J.P. O’Donnell Early identification of learning disabilities: A comparison of two methods Journal of Educational Psychology 76 1985 1106 1108
50. Horowitz, S. H., Lichtenstein, B., & Roller, C. (February, 2002). An intervention-oriented, multi-tiered approach for identifying and serving students with learning disabilities . Straw man prepared for the Learning Disabilities Roundtable “Finding Common Ground” Initiative, Washington, DC.
51. Hynd, G. W., Clinton, A. B., & Hiemenz, J. R. (1999). The neoropsychological basis of learning disabilities. In: R. J. Sternberg & L. Spear-Swerling (Eds), Perspectives on Learning Disabilities: Biological, Cognitive, Contextual (pp. 60–82). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
52. K.A. Kavale S.R. Forness A meta-analysis assessing the validity of Wechsler Scale profiles and recategorizations: Patterns or parodies? Learning Disability Quarterly 7 1984 136 156
53. K.A. Kavale S.R. Forness The far side of heterogeneity: A critical analysis of empirical subtyping research in learning disabilities Journal of Learning Disabilities 20 1987 374 382
54. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1995). The nature of learning disabilities: Critical elements of diagnosis and classification . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. K.A. Kavale S.R. Forness The politics of learning disabilities Learning Disability Quarterly 21 1998 245 273
56. K.A. Kavale S.R. Forness What definitions of learning disability say and don’t say: A critical analysis Journal of Learning Disabilities 33 2000 239 256
57. K.A. Kavale S.R. Forness T.C. Lorsbach Definition for definitions of learning disabilities Learning Disability Quarterly 14 1991 257 266
58. K.A. Kavale D. Fuchs T.E. Scruggs Setting the record straight on learning disabilities and low achievement Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 9 1994 70 77
59. K.A. Kavale P.D. Mattson “One jumped off the balance beam”: Meta-analysis of the efficacy of perceptual motor training Journal of Learning Disabilities 16 1983 165 173
60. K.A. Kavale C. Nye Parameters of learning disabilities in achievement, linguistic, neuropsychological, and social/behavioral domains Journal of Special Education 19 1985–1986 443 458
61. K.A. Kavale C. Nye The structure of learning disabilities Exceptionality 2 3 1991 141 156
62. K.A. Kavale J.H. Reese Teacher beliefs and perceptions about learning disabilities: A survey of Iowa’s practitioners Learning Disability Quarterly 14 1991 141 160
63. B.K. Keogh Future of the LD field: Research and practice Journal of Learning Disabilities 19 1986 455 460
64. Keogh, B. K. (1994). A matrix of decision points in the measurement of learning disabilities. In: G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues (pp. 15–26). Baltimore: Brookes.
65. B. Keogh L.D. Becker Early detection of learning problems: Questions, cautions, and guidelines Exceptional Children 40 1973 5 11
66. Kirk, S. A. (1971). Psycholinguistic learning disabilities: Diagnosis and remediation . Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
67. L. Kosc Neuropsychological implications of diagnosis and treatment of mathematical learning disabilities Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities 1 1981 19 30
68. Kussmaul, A. (1877). Disturbances of speech. In: H. von Ziemssen (Ed.), Cyclopedia of the Practice of Medicine . J. McCreery (Trans.). New York: William Wood.
69. S.C. Larsen D.D. Hammill The relationship of selected visual perceptual abilities to school learning Journal of Special Education 9 1975 281 291
70. G. Lester M. Kelman State disparities in the diagnosis and placement of pupils with learning disabilities Journal of Learning Disabilities 30 1997 599 607
71. G.R. Lyon Identification and remediation of learning disability subtypes: Preliminary findings Learning Disabilities Focus 1 1985 21 35
72. Lyon, G. R. (March, 2001). Measuring success: Using assessments and accountability to raise student achievement . Statement to Subcommittee on Education Reform, Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC http://edworkforce.house.gov/hearings/107th/edr/account3801/lyon.htm
73. Lyon, G. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2001). Early warning system. Education Next (Summer), 23–29. http://www.educationnext.org/20012/22.html
74. Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Torgesen, J. K., Wood, F. B., Schulte, A., & Olson, R. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In: C. E. Finn, Jr., A. J. Rotherham & C. R. Hokanson, Jr. (Eds), Rethinking Special Education for a New Century (pp. 259–287). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
75. D.L. MacMillan F.M. Gresham K.M. Bocian Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: An empirical investigation Journal of Learning Disabilities 31 1998 314 326
76. D.L. MacMillan F.M. Gresham G.N. Siperstein K.M. Bocian The labyrinth of I.D.E.A.: School decisions on referred students with subaverage general intelligence American Journal on Mental Retardation 101 1996 161 174
77. MacMillan, D. L., & Siperstein, G. N. (August, 2001). Learning disabilities as operationally defined in schools. Paper presented at the U.S. Department of Education LD Summit, Washington, DC.
78. MacMillan, D. L., & Siperstein, G. N. (2002). Learning disabilities as operationally defined by schools. In: R. Bradley, L. Danielson & D. P. Hallahan (Eds), Identification of Learning Disabilities: Research to Practice (pp. 287–333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
79. D.L. MacMillan G.N. Siperstein F.M. Gresham A challenge to the viability of mild mental retardation as a diagnostic category Exceptional Children 62 1996 356 371
80. M.A. Mastropieri Statistical and psychometric issues surrounding severe discrepancy: A discussion Learning Disabilities Research 30 1987 29 31
81. Mastropieri, M. A. (1988). Learning disabilities in early childhood. In: K. A. Kavale (Ed.), Learning Disabilities: State of the Art and Practice (pp. 161–179). Boston: College-Hill/Little Brown.
82. Mastropieri, M. A. (August, 2001). Discrepancy models in the identification of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the U.S. Department of Education LD Summit, Washington, DC.
83. M.A. Mastropieri T.E. Scruggs Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities Remedial and Special Education 18 1997 197 213
84. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2000). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
85. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2002). Discrepancy models in the identification of learning disabilities: A response to Kavale. In: R. Bradley, L. Danielson & D. P. Hallahan (Eds), Identification of Learning Disabilities: Research to Practice (pp. 449–456). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
86. McCarthy, J. M. (1971). Learning disabilities: Where have we been: Where are we going? In: D. Hammill & N. Bartel (Eds), Educational Perspectives in Learning Disabilities (pp. 10–19). New York: Wiley.
87. J.D. McKinney E.J. Short L. Feagans Academic consequences of perceptual-linguistic subtypes of learning disabled children Learning Disabilities Research 1 1985 6 17
88. J. McLeskey N.L. Waldron The identification and characteristics of students with learning disabilities in Indiana Learning Disabilities Research 5 1990 72 78
89. Meehl, P. (1973). Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
90. C.D. Mercer C. Forgnone W.D. Wolking Definitions of learning disabilities used in the United States Journal of Learning Disabilities 9 1976 376 386
91. W.P. Morgan A case of congential word blindness The Brititsh Medical Journal 2 1896 1378
92. J. Naglieri Do ability and reading achievement correlate? Journal of Learning Disabilities 34 2001 304 306
93. Naglieri, J., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive assessment system . Itasca, IL: Riverside.
94. Olson, R. K. (1999). Genes, environment, and reading disabilities. In: R. J. Sternberg & L. Spear-Swerling (Eds), Perspectives on Learning Disabilities: Biological, Cognitive, Contextual (pp. 3–21). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
95. C.R. Reynolds Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities The Journal of Special Education 18 1984 451 476
96. Rourke, B. (1989). Non-verbal learning disabilities: The syndrome and the model . New York: Guilford Press.
97. B. Rourke Arithmetic disabilities, specific and otherwise: A neuropsychological perspective Journal of Learning Disabilities 26 1993 214 226
98. Rumsey, J. M. (1996). Neuroimaging in developmental dyslexia: A review and conceptualization. In: G. R. Lyon & J. M. Rumsey (Eds), Neuroimaging: A Window to the Neurological Foundations of Learning and Behavior in Children (pp. 57–78). Baltimore: Brookes.
99. M. Rutter W. Yule The concept of specific reading retardation Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 16 1975 181 197
100. Schrag, J. (2000). Discrepancy approaches for identifying learning disabilities . Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
101. T.E. Scruggs Theoretical issues surrounding severe discrepancy: A discussion Learning Disabilities Research 3 1987 21 23
102. T.E. Scruggs S.J. Cohn A university-based summer program for a highly able but poorly achieving Indian child Gifted Child Quarterly 27 1983 90 93
103. T.E. Scruggs M.A. Mastropieri Academic characteristics of behaviorally disordered and learning disabled children Behavioral Disorders 11 1986 184 190
104. T.E. Scruggs M.A. Mastropieri Legitimizing the field of learning disabilities: Does research orientation matter? Journal of Learning Disabilities 21 1988 219 222
105. T.E. Scruggs M.A. Mastropieri Assessing students with learning disabilities: Current issues and future directions Diagnostique 20 1994–1995 17 31
106. T.E. Scruggs M.A. Mastropieri On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities Learning Disability Quarterly 25 2002 155 168
107. S.E. Shaywitz M.D. Escobar B.A. Shaywitz J.M. Fletcher R. Makach Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability The New England Journal of Medicine 326 1992 145 150
108. B.A. Shaywitz J.M. Fletcher J.M. Holahan S.E. Shaywitz Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability: Results from the Connecticut Longitudinal Study Journal of Learning Disabilities 25 1992 639 648
109. L.A. Shepard An evaluation of the regression discrepancy method for identifying children with learning disabilities Journal of Special Education 14 1980 79 91
110. L.S. Siegel I.Q. is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities Journal of Learning Disabilities 25 1989 618 629
111. Siegel, L. (1999). Learning disabilities: The roads we have traveled and the path to the future. In: R. J. Sternberg & L. Spear-Swerling (Eds), Perspectives on Learning Disabilities: Biological, Cognitive, Contextual (pp. 159–175). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
112. L.S. Siegel E.B. Ryan Development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children Child Development 60 1988 973 980
113. Skrtic, T. M. (1999). Learning disabilities as organizational pathologies. In: R. J. Sternberg & L. Spear-Swerling (Eds), Perspectives on Learning Disabilities: Biological, Cognitive, Contextual (pp. 193–226). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
114. Sleeter, C. E. (1995). Radical structuralist perspectives on the creation and use of learning disabilities. In: T. Skrtic (Ed.), Disability and Democracy: Reconstructing (Special) Education for Postmodernity (pp. 153–165). New York: Teachers College Press.
115. Spear-Swerling, L. (1999). Can we get there from here: Learning disabilities and future education policy. In: R. J. Sternberg & L. Spear-Swerling (Eds), Perspectives on Learning Disabilities: Biological, Cognitive, Contextual (pp. 250–276). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
116. Speece, D. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: Convergence, expansion, and caution. In: R. Bradley, L. Danielson & D. P. Hallahan (Eds), Identification of Learning Disabilities: Research to Practice (pp. 279–285). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
117. D.L. Speece L.P. Case Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability Journal of Educational Psychology 93 2001 735 749
118. K.E. Stanovich Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological core-variable difference model Journal of Learning Disabilities 21 1988 590 604
119. K.E. Stanovich Conceptual and empirical problems with discrepancy definitions of reading disability Learning Disability Quarterly 14 1991 269 283
120. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Epilogue: Toward and emerging consensus about learning disabilities. In: R. J. Sternberg & L. Spear-Swerling (Eds), Perspectives on Learning Disabilities: Biological, Cognitive, Contextual (pp. 277–282). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
121. J.D. Strang B.P. Rourke Concept-formation/non-verbal reasoning abilities of children who exhibit specific academic problems with arithmetic Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 24 1983 28 37
122. Swanson, H. L. (1993). Theoretical, technical, and practical aspects of the S-cognitive processing test: The development of a dynamic assessment measure. In: T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds), Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities (Vol. 10, Part A, pp. 135–208). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
123. Swerling, S. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Off track: When poor readers become learning disabled . Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
124. Torgesen, J. K. (1998). Learning disabilities: An historical and conceptual overview. In: B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about Learning Disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 3–34). New York: Academic Press.
125. Torgesen, J. K. (1999). Phonologically-based reading disabilities: Toward a coherent theory of one kind of learning disability. In: R. J. Sternberg & L. Spear-Swerling (Eds), Perspectives on Learning Disabilities: Biological, Cognitive, Contextual (pp. 106–135). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
126. J.K. Torgesen Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 15 2000 55 64
127. Torgesen, J. K. (2002). Empirical and theoretical support for diagnosis of learning disabilities by assessment of intrinsic processing weaknesses. In: R. Bradley, L. Danielson & D. P. Hallahan (Eds), Identification of Learning Disabilities: Research to Practice (pp. 565–652). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
128. J.K. Torgesen R.K. Wagner Alternative diagnostic approaches for specific developmental reading disabilities Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 13 1998 220 232
129. U.S. Department of Education (2000). Twenty-second annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act . Washington, DC: Author.
130. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (2002). Specific learning disabilities: Finding common ground . Washington, DC: Author.
131. F.R. Vellutino D.M. Scanlon G.R. Lyon Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-discrepancy definition of reading disability Journal of Learning Disabilities 33 2000 223 238
132. Wagner, R. K., & Garon, T. (1999). Learning disabilities in perspective. In: R. J. Sternberg & L. Spear-Swerling (Eds), Perspectives on Learning Disabilities: Biological, Cognitive, Contextual (pp. 83–105). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
133. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processes . Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
134. L.R. Wilson Large-scale learning disability identification: The reprieve of a concept Exceptional Children 52 1985 44 51
135. J.F. Wissink C.E. Kass W.R. Ferrell A Bayesian approach to the identificaiton of children with learning disabilities Journal of Learning Disabilities 8 1975 58 66
136. M. Wolf P.G. Bowers The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias Journal of Educational Psychology 91 1999 415 438
137. Wong, B. Y. L. (1996). The ABCs of learning disabilities . New York: Academic Press.
138. F. Wood L. Flowers M. Buchsbaum P. Tallal Investigation of abnormal left temporal functioning in dyslexia through CBF, auditory evoked potentials, and positron emission tomography Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 3 1991 379 393
139. J.E. Ysseldyke B. Algozzine L. Richey J.P. Graden Declaring students eligible for learning disability services. Why bother with the data? Learning Disability Quarterly 5 1982 37 44
140. J.E. Ysseldyke B. Algozzine M.R. Shinn M. McGue Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified learning disabled Journal of Special Education 16 1982 73 85
141. Zigmond, N. (1993). Learning disabilities from an educational perspective. In: G. R. Lyon, D. B. Gray, J. R. Kavanagh & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds), Better Understanding Learning Disabilities: New Views from Research and their Implications for Education and Public Policies (pp. 251–272). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.