Likelihood ratios increase diagnostic certainty in pulmonary embolism

EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 322-329

  Chu, Kevin ^a   Brown, Anthony F T ^a  

^a ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

D dimer; Diagnostic test; Likelihood ratio; Pulmonary embolism; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

D DIMER;

ALGORITHM; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HUMAN; LUNG EMBOLISM; LUNG VENTILATION PERFUSION RATIO; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 28444488988     PISSN: 17426731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00754.x     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Mountain D. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: a question of too much choice? Emerg. Med. 2003; 15: 250-65.
2. Fedullo PF, Tapson VF. The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003; 349: 1247-56.
3. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development Group. British thoracic society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 2003; 58: 470-84.
4. Chu K. An introduction to sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. Emerg. Med. 1999; 11: 175-81.
5. Attia J. Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests. Aust. Prescriber 2003; 26: 111-13.
6. Hayden SR, Brown MD. Likelihood ratio: a powerful tool for incorporating the results of a diagnostic test into clinical decision-making. Ann. Emerg Med. 1999; 33: 575-80.
7. Pewsner D, Battaglia M, Minder C et al. Ruling a diagnosis in or out with 'SpPIn' and 'SnNOut': a note of caution. BMJ 2004; 329: 209-13.
8. Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ 2004; 329: 168-9.
9. Attia JR, Nair BR, Sibbritt DW et al. Generating pre-test probabilities: a neglected area in clinical decision making. Med. J. Aust. 2004; 180: 449-54.
10. Scott IA. Estimating disease likelihood: a case of rubbery figures. Med. J. Aust. 2004; 180: 438-9.
11. American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2003; 41: 257-70.
12. Kline JA, Wells PS. Methodology for a rapid protocol to rule out pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2003; 42: 266-75.
13. Van der Graff F, van den Borne H, van der Kolk M et al. Exclusion of deep venous thrombosis with D-dimer testing: comparison of 13 D-dimer methods in 99 outpatients suspected of deep venous thrombosis using venography as reference standard. Thromb. Haemost. 2000; 83: 197-8.
14. Mountain D. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: the D-dimer dilemma. In reply. Emerg. Med. 2003; 15: 530-1.
15. Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine. Likelihood ratios. Available from URL: http://www.cebm.net/likelihood_ratios.asp [Accessed 29 October 2004].
16. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guide to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 1994; 271: 703-7.
17. The PIOPED Investigators. Value of ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 1990; 263: 2753-9.
18. Gray HW, Bessent RG. Pulmonary embolism exclusion: a practical approach to low probability using the PIOPED data. Eur. Nucl. Med. 1998; 25: 271-6.
19. Gottschalk A, Stein PD, Goodman LR et al. Overview of Prospective Investigation of the Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II. Eur. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2002; 32: 173-82.
20. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR et al. Utility of ultrasound imaging of the lower extremities in the diagnostic approach in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J. Int. Med. 2001; 250: 262-4.