STARTING AT THE BEGINNING FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES IDENTIFICATION: RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION IN GENERAL EDUCATION

Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities

Volumn 16, Issue , 2003, Pages 37-50

  Speece, Deborah L ^a   Molloy, Dawn Eddy ^a   Case, Lisa Pericola ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28444480942     PISSN: 0735004X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-004X(03)16002-8     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Adams, M. J., Foorman, B. R., Lundberg, I., & Beeler, T. D. (1998). Phonemic awareness in young children . Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
2. Case, L. P., Speece, D. L., & Molloy, D. E. (in press). The validity of a response to instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors. School Psychology Review .
3. J.B Carroll A model of school learning Teachers College Record 64 1963 321 339
4. Deno, S. L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and alternative special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In: M. R. Shinn (Ed.) Curriculum-Based Measurement: Assessing Special Children (pp. 1–17). New York: Guilford Press.
5. S.L Deno L.S Fuchs D Marston J Shin Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities School Psychology Review 30 2001 507 524
6. Donovan, S., & Cross, C. (2002). Minority students in gifted and special education . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. J.M Fletcher S.E Shaywitz D.P Shankweiler L Katz I.Y Liberman K.K Stuebing D.J Francis A.E Fowler B.A Shaywitz Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions Journal of Educational Psychology 86 1994 6 23
8. Fuchs, L. S. (1995, May). Incorporating curriculum-based measurement into the eligibility decision-making process: A focus on treatment validity and student growth. Paper presented at the Workshop on IQ testing and educational decision making, national research council, national academy of science. Washington, DC.
9. L.S Fuchs D Fuchs Effects of systematic formative evaluation on student achievement: A meta-analysis Exceptional Children 53 1986 199 208
10. L.S Fuchs D Fuchs Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 13 4 1998 204 219
11. L.S Fuchs D Fuchs C.L Hamlett Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems Journal of Educational Research 83 1989 103 111
12. L.S Fuchs D Fuchs C.L Hamlett Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement Exceptional Children 55 1989 229 238
13. D Fuchs L.S Fuchs P.M Mathes D Simmons Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to student diversity American Educational Research Journal 34 1987 174 206
14. L.S Fuchs D Fuchs D.L Speece Treatment validity as a unifying construct for identifying learning disabilities Learning Disability Quarterly 25 2002 33 46
15. J.R Jenkins W Mayhall C Peshka V Townsend Using direct and daily measures to increase learning Journal of Learning Disabilities 10 1974 604 608
16. Keogh, B. K., & Speece, D. L. (1996). Learning disabilities within the context of schooling. In: D. L. Speece & B. K. Keogh (Eds), Research on Classroom Ecologies: Implications for Inclusion of Children with Learning Disabilities (pp. 1–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. S Messick Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning American Psychologist 50 1995 741 749
18. President’s Commission on excellence in special education (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Retrieved July 10, 2002 from PCESE. Web site: http://www.ed.gov/inits/commissionsboards/whspecialeducation
19. D.L Share R McGee P Silva IQ and reading progress: A test of the capacity notion of IQ Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 28 1989 97 100
20. D.L Speece L.P Case Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability Journal of Educational Psychology 93 2001 735 749
21. Speece, D. L., Case, L. P., & Molloy, D. E. (2002). Effects of an early identification/general education intervention program on children at risk for reading failure. Manuscript in preparation.
22. D.L Speece L Shekitka How should reading disabilities be operationalized? A survey of experts Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 17 2002 118 123
23. K.E Stanovich L.S Siegel Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model Journal of Educational Psychology 86 1994 24 53
24. U.S. Office of Education (1977). Definition and criteria for defining students as learning disabled. Federal Register , 42(250) (pp. 65083). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25. F.R Vellutino D.M Scanlon E.R Sipay S.G Small R Chen A Pratt M.B Denckla Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability Journal of Educational Psychology 88 1996 601 638
26. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children – revised . New York: Psychological Corporation.
27. C Wesson S.L Deno P.K Mirkin G Maruyama R Skiba R King B Sevcik A causal analysis of the relationships among ongoing curriculum-based measurement and evaluation, the structure of instruction, and student achievement The Journal of Special Education 22 1988 330 343
28. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock–Johnson psychoeducational battery – revised . Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.