Applying problem-solving principles in mainstream courts: Lessons for state courts

Justice System Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 57-75

  Farole, Donald J ^a   Puffett, Nora ^a   Rempel, Michael ^a   Byrne, Francine ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28444466243     PISSN: 0098261X     EISSN: 23277556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2005.10767738     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abrahamson, S. S. (2000). “The Appeal of Therapeutic Jurisprudence,” 24 Seattle University Law Review 223
2. Bamberger, P. S. (2003). “Special Series: Problem Solving Courts and Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Specialized Courts: Not a Cure-All,” 30 Fordham Urban Law Journal 10-91
3. Becker, D. J. and M. D. Corrigan (2002). “Moving Problem Solving Courts into the Mainstream: A Report Card from the CCJ-COSCA Problem-Solving Courts Committee,” 39:1 Court Review 4
4. Berman, G. (2004). “Think Piece: The Hardest Sell?: Problem-Solving Justice and the Challenges of Statewide Implementation.” Center for Court Innovation, New York
5. Berman, G., and A. Gulick (2003). “Just the (Unwieldy, Hard to Gather, But Nonetheless Essential), Facts Ma’am: What We Know and Don’t Know about Problem-Solving Courts,” 30 Fordham Urban Law Journal 10-27
6. Casey, P. M., and D. B. Rottman (2005). “Problem Solving Courts: Models and Trends,” 26 Justice System Journal 35
7. (2003). “Problem Solving Courts: Models, Commonalities, and Trends: The View from the
8. United States.” Prepared for “Problem Solving Courts: An International Perspective,” Psychology and Law International, Interdisciplinary Conference, July, Edinburgh, Scotland
9. (2000). “Therapeutic Jurisprudence in the Courts,” 18 Behavioral Sciences and the Law 445
10. Chase, D., and P. Hora (2000). “The Implications of Therapeutic Jurisprudence for Judicial Satisfaction,” 37:1 Court Review 12
11. Domitrovich, S. (1998). “Utilizing an Effective Economic Approach to Family Court: A Proposal for a Statutory Unified Family Court in Pennsylvania,” 37 Duquesne Law Review 1
12. Feinblatt, J., G. Berman, and A. Fox (2000). “Institutionalizing Innovation: The New York Drug Court Story,” 28 Fordham Urban Law Journal 277
13. Fox, A., and R. Wolf (2004). The Future of Drug Courts: How States Are Mainstreaming the Model. New York: Center for Court Innovation
14. Garcia, P. A. (2003). Problem Solving Courts. Chicago: American Bar Association, Coalition for Justice
15. Gilbert, J., R. Grimm, and J. Parnham (2001). “Applying Therapeutic Principles to a Family-Focused Juvenile Justice Model (Delinquency),” 52 Alabama Law Review 11-53
16. Goldkamp, J. (2003). “The Impact of Drug Courts,” 2 Criminology and Public Policy 197
17. Gottfredson, D., S. Najaka, and B. Kearley (2003). “Effectiveness of Drug Treatment Courts: Evidence from a Randomized Trial,” 2 Criminology and Public Policy 171
18. Hanson, R. (2002). “The Changing Role of a Judge and Its Implications,” 38:4 Court Review 10
19. Harrell, A. (2003). “Judging Drug Courts: Balancing the Evidence,” 2 Criminology and Public Policy 207
20. Leben, S. (2000). “Thoughts on Some Potential Appellate and Trial Court Applications of Therapeutic Jurisprudence,” 24 Seattle University Law Review 467
21. Marlowe, D. B., D. S. DeMatteo, and D. S. Festinger (2003). “A Sober Assessment of Drug Courts,” 16 Federal Sentencing Reporter 153
22. NADCP (National Association of Drug Court Professionals) (1997). Defining Drug Courts: The Key Components. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice
23. Rempel, M., D. Fox-Kralstein, A. Cissner, R. Cohen, M. Labriola, D. Farole, A. Bader, and M. Magnani (2003). The New York State Adult Drug Court Evaluation: Policies, Participants, and Impacts. New York: Center for Court Innovation
24. Rottman, D. B. (2000). “Does Effective Therapeutic Jurisprudence Require Specialized Courts (and Do Specialized Courts Imply Specialist Judges)?,” 37:1 Court Review 22
25. Schafer, C., and J. Zwieg (2004). “National Portrait of Adult Drug Courts: Findings from the 2004 Drug Court Survey.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, November, Nashville, Tennessee
26. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the Grassroots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley: University of California Press
27. Stempel, J. W. (1995). “Two Cheers for Specialization,” 61 Brooklyn Law Review 67
28. Wexler, D. B. (2000). “Just Some Juvenile Thinking about Delinquent Behavior: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Approach to Relapse Prevention Planning and Youth Advisory Juries,” 69 UMKC Law Review 93
29. Wilson, D. B., O. Mitchell, and D. L. MacKenzie (2003). “A Systematic Review of Drug Court Effects on Recidivism.” Draft MS