Problem-solving courts: Models and trends

Justice System Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 35-56

  Casey, Pamela M ^a   Rottman, David B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28444474197     PISSN: 0098261X     EISSN: 23277556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2005.10767737     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alaska Court System (2003). “Coordinated Resources Project (CRP): Anchorage Mental Health Court.” http://www.state.ak.us/courts/mhct.htm
2. Barayuga, D. (2003). “Advocates Laud Plans for Mental Health Court. Honolulu Star-Bulletin Online, February 10. http://starbulletin.com/2003/02/10/news/index2.html
3. Barnoski, R., and S. Aos (2003). Washington State’s Drug Courts for Adult Defendants: Outcome Evaluation and Cost-Benefit Analysis. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/drugcourtMar2003.pdf
4. Belenko, S. (2001). Research on Drug Courts: A Critical Review 2001 Update. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. http://www.casacolumbia.org/absolutenm/articlefiles/researchondrug.pdf
5. (1998). “Research on Drug Courts: A Critical Review,” 1:1 National Drug Court Institute Review 10-55. http://www.ndci.org/admin/docs/ndcir11.pdf
6. Bennett, L., and O. Williams (2001). “Controversies and Recent Studies of Batterer Intervention Program Effectiveness.” National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women. http://www.vawnet.org/DomesticViolence/Research/VAWnetDocs/AR_bip.php
7. Berman, G., and A. Gulick (2003). “Just the (Unwieldy, Hard to Gather but Nonetheless Essential) Facts, Ma’am: What We Know and Don’t Know About Problem-Solving Courts,” 30 Fordham Urban Law Journal 10-27
8. Boothroyd, R. A., N. G. Poythress, A. McGaha, and J. Petrila (2003). “The Broward Mental Health Court: Process, Outcomes, and Service Utilization.” 26 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 55
9. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1999). Mental Health and Treatment of Inmates and Probationers. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/mhtip.pdf
10. “The Drugging of the Courts: How Sick Is the Patient and What Is the Treatment?” (1990). 73 Judicature 314
11. Feder, L., and D. R. Forde (2000). A Test of the Efficacy of Court-Mandated Counseling for Domestic Violence Offenders: The Broward Experiment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice
12. Goldkamp, J. (1996). The Role of Drug and Alcohol Abuse in Domestic Violence and Its Treatment: Dade County’s Domestic Violence Court Experiment. Philadelphia: Criminal Justice Research Institute
13. Goldkamp, J. S., and C. Irons-Guynn (2000). Emerging Judicial Strategies for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Caseload: Mental Health Courts in Fort Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance. http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/bja/182504.pdf
14. Goldkamp, J., D. Weiland, and C. Irons-Guynn (2001). Developing an Evaluation Plan for Community Courts: Assessing the Hartford Community Court Model. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance. http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/bja/185689.pdf
15. Grover, A., J. MacDonald, G. Alpert, and I. Geary (2003). The Lexington County Domestic Violence Court: A Partnership and Evaluation. Columbia, SC: Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice
16. Hennepin County District Court Research Division (2002a). Domestic Violence Court: Results of Victim Survey. Minneapolis: Hennepin County District Court Research Division
17. (2002b). Results of Survey of Domestic Violence Court Defendants: Understanding of Court Ordered Conditions. Minneapolis: Hennepin County District Court Research Division
18. (2001). Hennepin County Community Justice Project: Summary of Short-Term Evaluation. Minneapolis: Fourth Judicial District
19. Herinckx, H. (2003). “Jail Booking Data Analysis.” Available from author at the Regional Research Institute for Human Services, Portland State University, Oregon
20. Hora, P. F., W. G. Schma, and T. A. Rosenthal (1999). “Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Drug Treatment Court Movement: Revolutionizing the Criminal Justice System’s Response to Drug Abuse and Crime in America,” 74 Notre Dame Law Review 439
21. Jackson, S., L. Feder, D. Forde, R. Davis, C. Maxwell, and B. Taylor (2003). Batterer Intervention Programs: Where Do We Go from Here? Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice
22. Johnstone, Q. (2001). “The Hartford Community Court Experiment: An Experiment That Has Succeeded,” 34 Connecticut Law Review 123
23. Keilitz, S. (2000). Specialization of Domestic Violence Courts: A National Survey. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts
24. Kelling, G. L. (1998). “Crime Control, the Police, and Culture Wars: Broken Windows and Cultural Pluralism,” in Perspectives on Crime and Justice: 1997-1998 Lecture Series. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice
25. Lee, E. (2000). Community Courts: An Evolving Model. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance. http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/bja/183452.pdf
26. Levey, L., M. W. Steketee, and S. Keilitz (2001). Lessons Learned in Implementing an Integrated Domestic Violence Court: The District of Columbia Experience. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts
27. Lowenkamp, C. T., A. M. Holsinger, and E. J. Latessa (2003). “Are Drug Courts Effective: A Meta-analytic Review.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Cincinnati
28. Lyon, E. (2002). Special Session Domestic Violence Courts: Enhanced Advocacy and Interventions. Storrs: University of Connecticut School of Social Work
29. MacLoed, D., and J. Weber (2000). Domestic Violence Courts: A Descriptive Study. Sacramento: Judicial Council of California
30. National Association of Drug Court Professionals (1997). Defining Drug Courts: The Key Components. Washington, DC: Drug Courts Program Office. http://www.ncjrs.org/html/bja/define/dfdpdf.pdf
31. National Mental Health Association (2001). “NMHA Position Statement—Mental Health Courts.” http://www.nmha.org/position/mentalhealthcourts.cfm
32. Newmark, L., M. Rempel, K. Diffily, and K. M. Kane (2001). Specialized Felony Domestic Violence Courts: Lessons on Implementation and Impacts from the King’s County Experience. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410381_Dom ViolCourts.pdf
33. Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse (2003). Drug Court Activity Update: May 1, 2003. Washington, DC: American University School of Public Affairs. http://www. american.edu/justice/
34. (2001a). Drug Court Activity Update: Summary Information on All Programs and Detailed Information on Adult Drug Courts. Washington, DC: American University School of Public Affairs. http://www.american.edu/academic.depts/spa/justice/publications/allcourtactivity.pdf
35. (2001b). 2000 Drug Court Survey Report: Program Operations, Services and Participant Perspectives, Executive Summary Draft. Washington, DC: American University School of Public Affairs
36. Petrila, J. (2002). “The Effectiveness of the Broward Mental Health Court: An Evaluation.” Policy Brief, no. 16. http://www.fmhi.usf.edu/institute/pubs/newsletters/policybriefs/issue016.pdf
37. Petrucci, C. (2002). “Respect as a Component in the Judge-Defendant Interaction in a Specialized Domestic Violence Court that Utilizes Therapeutic Jurisprudence,” 38:2 Criminal Law Bulletin 263
38. Rottman, D. (1996). “Community Courts: Prospects and Limits,” August: no. 231 NIJ Journal 46. http://ncjrs.org/pdffiles/nijjcomm.pdf
39. Sack, E. (2002). Creating a Domestic Violence Court: Guidelines and Best Practices. San Francisco: Family Violence Prevention Fund
40. San Diego Superior Court (2000). Evaluation Report for the San Diego Domestic Violence Courts. San Diego: San Diego Superior Court
41. Steketee, M., L. Levey, and S. Keilitz (2000). Implementing an Integrated Domestic Violence Court: Systemic Changes in the District of Columbia. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts. http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Res_FamVio_Implement IntegratedDVCrtFinalReportPub.pdf
42. Sviridoff, M., D. Rottman, R. Weidner, R. Curtis, F. Cheesman, and B. Ostrom (2002). Dispensing Justice Locally: The Impacts, Costs and Benefits of the Midtown Community Court. New York: Center for Court Innovation. Full report available at http://www. ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/grants/196397.pdf. Executive summary available at http://www. ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Res_CtComm_MidtownExecSumPub.pdf
43. Sviridoff, M., D. Rottman, B. Ostrom, and R. Curtis (2000). Dispensing Justice Locally: The Implementation and Effects of the Midtown Community Court. Amsterdam: Harcourt. http://www.courtinnovation.org/pdf/disp_just_loc.pdf
44. Trupin, E., H. Richards, D. M. Wertheimer, and C. Bruschi (2001). City of Seattle, Seattle Municipal Court, Mental Health Court: Evaluation Report. Seattle: Seattle Municipal Court. http://www.cityofseattle.net/courts/pdf/MHReport.pdf
45. Weidner, R. (1999). Hartford Community Court: Origins, Expectations and Implementation. New York: Center for Court Innovation. http://www.courtinnovation.org/pdf/hart_comm_court.pdf
46. Weidner, R., and C. Davis (2000). Benefits and Costs of the Hennepin County Community Court: A Preliminary Analysis. Minneapolis: Institute on Criminal Justice, University of Minnesota Law School