Differentiated lists of contact allergens are helpful to improve quality results from a cooperation of the DKG and IVDK (data from 24 dermatological departments);Differenzierte kontakt-allergenlisten dienen der qualitatsverbesserung

Hautarzt

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 184-191

  Brasch, J ^a   Geier, J ^b   Schnuch, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Cross reactivity Relevance; Epidemiology; Frequency; Patch testing

Indexed keywords

AMERCHOL L 101; BALSAM; CONTACT ALLERGEN; FRAGRANCE; NICKEL; PALLADIUM; THIOMERSAL; ALLERGEN; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS REACTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RELIABILITY; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKIN ALLERGY; CLASSIFICATION; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG ERUPTION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MIDDLE AGED; NEWBORN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALLERGENS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG ERUPTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0032018578     PISSN: 00178470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001050050725     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aberer W, Kranke B (1995) Thimerosal is a frequent sensitizer but is not in the Standard series. Contact Dermatitis 32.367-368
2. Andersen KE,Veien NK (1985) Biocide patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 12:99-103
3. Brasch J, Henseler T, Frosch P (1993) Patch test reactions to a preliminary preservative series. Occup Environment Dermatoses 41:71-76
4. Brasch J, Geier J, Gefeller O (1996) Dynamic patterns of allergic patch test reactions to ten European standard allergens. An analysis of data recorded by the "Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK)". Contact Dermatitis 35:17-22
5. Brasch J, Geier J (1997) Contact allergy in schoolchildren. Contact Dermatitis 37:286-293
6. Brehler R, Hellweg B (1995) Beurteilung von Epikutantestreaktionen nach Empfehlungen der Deutschen Kontaktallergie-Gruppe. Dtsch Dermatol 43.688-690
7. Christophersen J, Menné T, Tanghoj P, Andersen KE, Brandrup F, Kaaber K, Osmundsen PE, Thestrup-Pedersen K, Veien NK (1989) Clinical patch test data evaluated by multivariate analysis. Contact Dermatitis 21:291-299
8. Enders F, Przybilla B, Ring J, Burg G, Braun-Falco O (1988) Epikutantestung mit einer Standardreihe - Ergebnisse bei 12026 Patienten. Hautarzt 39:779-786
9. Frosch PJ (1990) Aktuelle Kontaktallergene. Hautarzt 41 [Suppl 10]:129-133
10. Geier J, Schnuch A (1994) Kontaktallergene bei Dentalberufen. Derm Beruf Umwelt 42:253-255
11. Geier J, Schnuch A (1995) A comparison of contact allergies among construction and nonconstruction workers attending contact dermatitis clinics in Germany - results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology from November 1989 to July 1993. Am J Contact Derm 6.86-94
12. Geier J, Fuchs T, Schnuch A (1996) Zunahme der Kontaktallergien gegen Methyldibromoglutaronitril in Deutschland. Allergologie 19:399-302
13. Goh CL (1988) An epidemiological comparison between hand eczema and non-hand eczema. Br J Dermatol 118:797-801
14. Holness DL, Nethercott JR (1994) Comparison of occupational and nonoccupational contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Derm 5:207-212
15. Koch P, Nickolaus G, Geier J (1996) Kontaktallergien bei Lederherstellern, Lederverarbeitern und in der Schuhindustrie. Fünf-Jahres-Analyse auf der Grundlage von Daten des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken. Dermatosen 44:257-262
16. Kwangsukstith C, Maibach HI (1995) Effect of age and sex on the induction and elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 33:289-298
17. Lange-Ionescu S, Pilz B, Geier J, Frosch PJ (1996) Kontaktallergien bei Patienten mit Stauungsdermtitis oder Ekzem der Beine/Ergebnisse des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken und der Deutschen Kontaktallergiegruppe. Derm Beruf Umwelt 44:14-22
18. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, Fowler JF, Fransway AF, Maibach HI, Mathias CGT, Nethercott JR, Rietschel RL, Rosenthal LE, Sherertz EF, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS (1995) North American contact dermatitis group Standard tray patch test results (1992 to 1994). Am J Contact Dermatitis 6:160-165
19. Moller H (1994) All these positive tests to thimerosal. Contact Dermatitis: 31.209-213
20. Nethercott JR, Holness DL, Adams RM, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, Emmett EA, Fowler J, Fisher AA, Larsen WG, Maibach HI, Marks J, Rietschel RL, Rosenthal L, Storrs WF, Taylor JS (1991) Patch testing with a routine screening tray in North America, 1987 through 1989. IV. Occupation and response. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2:247-254
21. Nethercott JR, Holness DL, Adams RM, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, Emmett EA, Fowler J, Fisher AA, Larsen WG, Maibach HI, Marks J, Rietschel RL, Rosenthal L, Schorr W, Storrs WF, Taylor JS (1991) Patch testing with a routine screening tray in North America, 1985 through 1989.I. Frequency of response. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2:122-129
22. Nethercott JR, Holness DL, Adams RM, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, Emmett EA, Fowler JF, Fisher AM, Larsen WG, Maibach HI, Marks JG, Rietschel RL, Rosenthal L, Schorr W, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS (1994) Multivariate analysis of the effect of selected factors on the elicitation of patch test response to 28 common environmental contactants in North America. Am J Contact Dermatitis 5:13-18
23. Nielsen NH, Menné T (1992) Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected danish population - the Glostrup allergy study. Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 72:456-460
24. Peters K-P, Frosch PJ, Uter W, Schnuch A, Arnold R, Bahmer F, Brasch J, Diepgen TL, Elsner F, Fuchs T, Henseler T, Muller S, Schulze-Dirks A, Stary A, Zimmermann J (1994) Typ IV-Allergien auf Friseurberufsstoffe. Dermatosen 42:50-57
25. Pilz B, Geier J, Frosch PJ, Schnuch A (1996) Positive Reaktionen auf Duftstoff Mix: Allergie oder Trugschluß? Allergologie 19:97
26. Podmore P, Burrows D, Bingham EA (1984) Prediction of patch test results. Contact Dermatitis 11:283-284
27. Rycroft RJG (1990) Is patch testing necessary? Rec Adv Dermatol 8.101-109
28. Scheuer B, Rüther T, v Bulow V, Henseler T, Deing B, Denzer-Fürst D, Dreismann G, Eckstein B, Engelke H, Gartner K, Hansen G, Hardung H, Heidbreder G, Hoffmann E, Kietzmann H, Kroger J, Mehnert I, Mohlenbeck F, Schlaak HE, Schmoll A, Schmoll M, Schroder I, Sipkova S, Sterry G, Trettel W, Walsdorfer U (1992) Häufige Kontaktallergene. Eine praxisorientierte Multicenterstudie. Akt Dermatol 18:44-49
29. Schnuch A, Lehmacher W (1992) Zur epidemiologischen Überwachung des Kontaktekzems - Darstellung des Projektes "Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken". Derm Beruf Umwelt 40:177-189
30. Schnuch A, Uter W, Lehmacher W, Fuchs T, Enders F, Arnold R, Bahmer F, Brasch J, Diepgen TL, Frosch PJ, Henseler T, Müller S, Peters KP, Schulze-Dirks A, Stary A, Zimmermann J (1993) Epikutantestung mit der Standardserie - Erste Ergebnisse des Projektes "Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken" (IVDK). Dermatosen 41:60-70
31. Schnuch A, Geier J (1994) Die häufigsten Kontaktallergene im zweiten Halbjahr 1993 - Auswertungen aus den Kliniken des IVDK in Zusammenarbeit mit der DKG. Dermatosen 42:210-211
32. Schnuch A, Geier J (1995) Die häufigsten Kontaktallergene im Jahr 1994. Auswertungen aus den Kliniken des IVDK in Zusammenarbeit mit der Deutschen Kontaktallergiegruppe. Dermatosen 43:275-278
33. Schnuch A (1996) PAFS: population-adjusted frequency of sensitization. I. Influence of sex and age. Contact Dermatitis 34:377-382
34. Schnuch A, Martin V (1997) Der Epikutantest. In: Korting HC, Sterry W (Hrsg) Diagnostische Verfahren in der Dermatologie. Blackwell, Berlin, S 99-116
35. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, Frosch PJ, Lehmacher W, Aberer W, Agathos M, Arnold R, Fuchs T, Laubstein B, Lischka G, Pietrzyk PM, Rakoski J, Richter G, Rueff F (1997) National rates and regional differences in sensitization of the standard series. Population adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 37:200-209
36. Uter W, Diepgen TL, Arnold R, Hillebrand O, Pietrzyk PM, Stuben O, Schnuch A (1992) The informational network of departments of dermatology in Germany - a multicenter project for computer-assisted monitoring of contact allergy - electronic data processing aspects. Derm Beruf Umwelt 40:142-149
37. Wilkinson JD, Hambly EM, Wilkinson DS (1980) Comparison of patch test results in two adjacent areas of England. II. Medicaments. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 60:245-249
38. Young E, Van Weelden H, Osch L van (1988) Age and sex distribution of the incidence of contact sensitivity to standard allergens. Contact Dermatitis 19:307-308