Moving mesh CFD-CSD aeroservoelastic modelling of BACT wing with autonomous flap control

Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2005, Pages 484-496

  Taylor, N V ^a   Allen, C B ^a,b   Gaitonde, A ^a   Jones, D P ^a   Fenwick, C L ^a   Hill, G F J ^a   Lee, V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b AIAA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; TIME AND MOTION STUDY;

AERODYNAMIC PERTURBATION; AEROELASTIC SIMULATION; AEROSERVOELASTIC MODELING;

AERODYNAMICS;

EID: 28844491093     PISSN: 10485953     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-4840     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. K.A. Kousen and O.O. Bendiksen. Non-linear aspects of the transonic aeroelastic stability problem. In AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 29th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Material Conference, 1988.
2. K.A. Kousen and O.O. Bendiksen. Limit cycle phenomena in computational transonic aeroelasticity. Journal of Aircarft, 31(6):1257-1263, Nov.-Dec. 1994.
3. J.J. Alonso and A. Jameson. Fully-implicit time-marching aeroelastic solutions. AIAA Paper No. 94-0056, Jan. 1994.
4. G.P. Guruswamy. Unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations for wings using euler equations. AIAA Journal, 28(3):461-469, March 1990.
5. B.A. Robinson J.T. Batina and H.T.Y. Yang. Aeroelastic analysis of wings using the euler equations with a deforming mesh. Journal of Aircraft, 28(11):781-788, Nov. 1991.
6. J.J. Meijer M.H.L. Hounjet B.J.G. Eussen and B.B. Prananta. Nlr-tu delf experience In unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelastic simulation applications. Technical Report No. 822, AGARD, March 1998. Numerical Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Simulation, pp. 11-1 - 11-21.
7. S. Schulze. Transonic aeroelastic simulation of a flexible wing section. Technical Report No. 822, AGARD, March 1998. Numerical Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Simulation, pp. 10-1 - 11-20.
8. G.S.L. Goura K.J. Badcock M.A. Woodgate and B.E. Richards. Implicit method for the time marching analysis of flutter. The Aeronautical Journal, 105(4):199-214, Apr. 2001.
9. O.O. Bendiksen and K.A. Kousen. Transonic flutter analysis using the euler equations. AIAA Paper No. 87-0911-CP, 1987.
10. J.T. Batina and T.Y. Young. Application of transonic codes to aeroelastic modelling of airfoils including active controls. Journal of Aircraft, 21(8):623-630, August 1984.
11. E.M. Lee-Rausch and J.T. Batina. Wing flutter boundary prediction using unsteady euler aerodynamic method. Journal of Aircraft, 32(2):416-422, March-April 1995.
12. C.H. Stephens A.S. Arena Jr and K.K. Gupta. Cfd-based aeroservoelastic predictions with comparisons to benchmark experimental data. AIAA Paper No 99-0766.
13. A. Sedaghat J.E. Cooper J.R. Wright and A.Y.T. Leung. Curve fitting approach for transonic flutter predicitons. The Aeronautical Journal, pages 565-572, Sept. 2003.
14. O.A. Kandil S. J. Massey and E.F. Sheta. Structural dynamics-cfd interaction for computation of vertical tail buffet. The Aeronautical Journal, pages 297-303, Aug/Sept 1996.
15. M. Lesonne and C. Farhat. High order subiteration-free staggered algorithm for nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems. AIAA Journal, 36(9): 1754-1757, 1998.
16. C. Degand C. Farhat and K. Pierson. Cfd based simulation of the unsteady aeroelastic response of a maneuvring vehicle. In ECCOMAS, Barcelona, 11-14 September 2000.
17. P. Geuzaine C. Farhat and G. Brown. Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid-structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an f-16 fighter. Computers and Fluids, 32:3-29, 2003.
18. L. Djayapertapa and C.B. Allen. Aeroservoelastic simulation by time-marching. The Aeronautical Journal, 105(1054):667-678, 2001.
19. C.B. Allen. Aeroelastic computations using algebraic grid motion. The Aeronautical Journal, 106(1064), October 2002.
20. A.L. Gaitonde N.V. Taylor, C.B. Allen and D.P. Jones. A structure-coupled cfd method for time-marching flutter analysis. The Aeronautical Journal, 108(1086):389-401, 2004.
21. C.L. Fenwick N.V. Taylor, C.B. Allen and L. Djayapertapa. Investigation of flutter suppression by active control. In 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, number AIAA Paper No. 2003-3510, Florida, June 2003.
22. A.L. Gaitonde D.P. Jones N.V. Taylor, C.B. Allen and G.F.J. Hill. Investigation of structural modelling methods for aeroelastic calculations. In Proceedings AIAA 22nd Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Rhode Island, August 2004.
23. N.V. Taylor C.B. Allen D.P. Jones A.L. Gaitonde and G.F.J. Hill. Investigation of structural modelling methods for aeroelastic calculations. Paper AIAA 2004-5370, at 22nd Applied Aerodynamics Conference, August 2004.
24. N.V. Taylor D. Jones C.B. Allen K.J. Badcock M.A. Woodgate A.M. Rampurawala J.E. Cooper G.A. Vio and M.J. deC. Henshaw. A comparison of linear and non-linear flutter prediciton methods: A summary of puma darp aeroelastic results. Paper 28, presented at the RAeS Conference, London, September 2004.
25. C.L. Fenwick and C.B. Allen. Development and validation of sliding grid technology for time domain aeroservoelastic simulations. Submitted to the AIAA conference, 2005.
26. C.B. Allen C.L. Fenwick N.V. Taylor and L. Djayapertapa. Investigation of flutter suppression by active control. AIAA Paper 2003-3510, 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Florida, June 2003.
27. C. B. Allen N. V. Taylor C. L. Fenwick A.L. Gaitonde and D.P. Jones. A comparison of non-linear and reduced order aerodynamic models in control law design for active flutter suppression, submitted to the IJNME Nov 2003, 2003.
28. R.C. Scott S.T. Hoadley C.D. Wieseman and M.H. Durham. The benchmark active controls technology model aerodynamic data. AIAA Paper 97-0829, Note: tables of Pressure distributions available for steady state flows at various Mach numbers and angle of attacks at http://www.caselab.okstate.edu/research/ experiment/bact.htm.
29. W. Schmidt A. Jameson and E. Turkel. Numerical solutions of the euler equations by finite volume methods using runge-kutta time stepping schemes. AIAA-Paper No. 81-1259, 1981.
30. A. Jameson. Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings. AIAA Paper 91-1596.
31. A.L. Gaitonde. A dual-time method for the solution of the unsteady euler equations. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, pages 283-291, October 1994.
32. A.L. Gaitonde D.P. Jones and S.P. Fiddes. Moving mesh generation for unsteady flows about deforming complex geometries. CFD Journal of Japanese Society of CFD, pages 430-439, 2001.
33. N.D. Melson M.D. Sanetrik and H.L. Atkins. Time-accurate navier-stokes calculations with multigrid acceleration. Technical Report CP 3224, NASA, 1993.
34. N.V. Taybr C.B. Allen A. Gaitonde and D.P. Jones. A structure coupled cfd method for time marching flutter analysis. Aeronautical Journal, 108(1084):389-401, 2004.
35. K.J. Bathe. Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1982.
36. N. Vlachos. Aero-structural coupling in transonic flow: Comparison of strong and weak coupling schemes. Rep. DERA/ASF/3662U - AERO.RK5615, May 1999.
37. G.S.L. Goura. Time Marching Analysis of Flutter using Computational Fluid Dynamics. PhD thesis, Glasgow University, Departnment of Aerospace Engineering, 2001.
38. J. Duchon. Splines minimising rotation-invariant semi-norms in sobolev spaces. In Constructive Theory of Functions of Several Variables. Springer (Germany), 1976.
39. R. Frank. Scattered data interpolation: Test of some methods. Mathematics of Computations, 38:181-199, 1982.
40. D.P. Jones. Force transfer in aeroelastic calculations. Technical Report Dept Aerospace Engineering Report AE046, University of Bristol, 2002.
41. D.P. Jones and A.L. Gaitonde. Parallel multiblock with movi9ng meshes for the calculation of unsteady flow past complex configurations. Technical report, University of Bristol, September 1999.
42. C.B. Allen. Multigrid convergence of inviscid fixed- and rotary-wing flows. Int. J. for Num. Methods in Fluids, 39(2):121-140, 2002.
43. M.R. Waszak. Modelling the benchmark active control technology wind-tunnel model for application to flutter supression. AIAA Paper 96-3437.
44. M.R. Waszak. Robust multivariable flutter suppression for the benchmark active cotvtrol technology (bact) wind-tunnel model. In Proc. 11th Symposium on Structural Dynamics and Control, VPISU, Blacksburg, VA, 1997.
45. V. Mukhopadhyay. Transonic flutter suppression control law design using classical and optimal techniques with windtunnel results. AIAA Paper No 99-1396 at the 40th Structures, Strutural Dynamics and Materials Conference, April 1999.
46. V. Mukhopadhyay. Flutter supression control law design and testing for the active flexible wing. Journal of Aircraft, 32(1):45-51, January-February 1995.
47. N.V. Taylor. Unsteady aerodynamic simulation by flight control system integration with structure-coupled cfd. Technical Report AE046, University of Bristol, November 2003.
48. L. Djayapertapa and C.B. Allen. Time-marching analysis of aeroservoelasticity. Paper 1, RAeS Aerodynamics Conference, London, April 2001.