Detecting collaborations in text

Computers and the Humanities

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 15-36

  Collins, Jeff ^a   Kaufer, David ^a   Vlachos, Pantelis ^a   Butler, Brian ^b   Ishizaki, Suguru ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Authorship attribution; Collaboration; Federalist papers; Statistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 28344440777     PISSN: 00104817     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:CHUM.0000009291.06947.52     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adair D. (1944) The Authorship of the Disputed Federalist Papers (2 Parts). William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd Series, pp. 97-122 and 235-264.
2. Bailey R.W. (1978) Authorship Attribution in a Forensic Setting. In Ager D.E., Knowles F.E., and Smith J. (eds.), Fifth Internat'l Symposium on Computers in Literary and Linguistic Research. U of Aston, Birmingham, pp. 1-20.
3. Biber D. (1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Carey G.W. (1984) Publius - A Split Personality? Review of Politics, 46(1), pp. 5-22.
5. Cicero (1954) Ad Herennium: On the Theory of Public Speaking, Loeb Classical Library. Harvard UP, Cambridge, MA.
6. Collins J. (2001) Collaborations in Text: The Federalist Case Support Site, [http://betterwriting.net/projects/fed01/ [10/30/02]].
7. Ede L., Lunsford A. (1990) Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
8. Efron B. (1979) The Bootstrap. In The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, pp. 27-36.
9. Efron B., Rogosa D., Tibshirani R. (2001) Resampling Methods of Estimation. In Smelser N. and Baltes P. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Vol. 19. Elsevier Science, pp. 13216-13220.
10. Fellbaum C. (1998) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, Language, Speech, and Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Fienberg S.E. (1979) The Analysis of Cross-classified Categorical Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Holmes D.I. (1994) Authorship Attribution. Computers and the Humanities, 28(1), pp. 87-106.
13. Holmes D.I., Forsyth R.S. (1995) The Federalist Revisited: New Directions in Authorship Attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 10(2), pp. 111-127.
14. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow, S. (2000) Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
15. Irizarry E. (1993) The Two Authors of Columbus' Diary. Computers and the Humanities, 27, pp. 85-92.
16. Kachigan S.K. (1991) Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd edition. Radius Press, FDR Station, NY.
17. Kaufer D.S., Butler, B.S. (1996) Rhetoric and the Arts of Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
18. Kaufer D.S., Butler, B.S. (2000) Principles of Writing as Representational Composition: Designing Interactive Worlds with Words. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
19. Kaufer D.S., Carley K.M. (1993) Communication at a Distance: The Influence of Print on Sociocultural Organization and Change, Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Kesler C.R. (1999) Introduction to The Federalist Papers. In Rossiter C. (ed.), The Federalist Papers. Mentor, New York, pp. vii-xxxiv.
21. LeFevre K.B. (1987) Invention as a Social Act. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
22. Mallon T. (2001) Stolen Words: The Classic Book on Plagiarism (Updated). Harcourt, New York.
23. Marcu D. (2000) The Rhetorical Parsing of Unrestricted Texts: A Surface-based Approach. Computational Linguistics, 26(3), pp. 395-448.
24. Martindale C., McKenzie D. (1995) On the Utility of Content Analysis in Author Attribution: The Federalist. Computers and the Humanities, 29(4), pp. 259-270.
25. May J.M., Wisse J. (2001) Introduction. In Cicero: On the Ideal Orator (De Oratore). Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3-56.
26. Mosteller F., Wallace D.L. (1964) Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
27. O'Hara T.F., Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S., Hartz S.C. (1982) A Comparison of Discriminant Function and Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Logistic Coefficients for Categorical-scaled Data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 14, pp. 169-178.
28. Richards I.A. (1991) Context Theory of Meaning and Types of Context. In Berthoff A.E. (ed.). Richards on Rhetoric. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 111-117.
29. Rudman J. (1998) The State of Authorship Attribution Studies: Some Problems and Solutions. Computers and the Humanities, 31, pp. 351-365.
30. Rudman J. (2000) Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies: Ignis Fatuus or Rosetta Stone?. Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin, 24(3), pp. 163-176.
31. Scolari (2000) Diction 5.0: The Text Analysis Program, [http://www.scolari.co.uk/diction/diction.htm [6/26/01]].
32. Seber C.A.F. (1984) Multivariate Observations. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
33. Stillinger J. (1991) Multiple Authorship and the Question of Authority. Text: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship, 5, pp. 283-293.
34. Stone P.J. (2000) Comparison of General Inquirer with Other Text-analysis Procedures. [http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~inquirer/ [4/4/01]].
35. Tukey J.W. (1949) Comparing Individual Means in the Analysis of Variance. Biometrics, 5, pp. 99-114.
36. Turner D. (1992) Project Gutenberg Etext of The Federalist Papers, [http://lcweb2.loc.gov/const/fed/fedpaper.txt [1/18/01]].
37. Vlachos P. (2001) StatLib Datasets Archive, [http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/ datasets [10/21/02]].
38. Wilks S.S. (1932) Certain Generalizations in the Analysis of Variance. Biometrika, 24, pp. 471-494.
39. Woodmansee M. (1994) Genius and the Copyright. In The Author, Art, and the Market: Rereading the History of Aesthetics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 35-55.