-
1
-
-
20144371627
-
-
P. K. Hansma, J. P. Cleveland, M. Radmacher, D. A. Walters, P. E. Hillner, M. Bezanilla, M. Fritz, D. Vie, H. G. Hansma, C. B. Prater, J. Massie, L. Fukunaga, J. Gurley, and V. Elings, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1738 (1994).
-
(1994)
Appl. Phys. Lett.
, vol.64
, pp. 1738
-
-
Hansma, P.K.1
Cleveland, J.P.2
Radmacher, M.3
Walters, D.A.4
Hillner, P.E.5
Bezanilla, M.6
Fritz, M.7
Vie, D.8
Hansma, H.G.9
Prater, C.B.10
Massie, J.11
Fukunaga, L.12
Gurley, J.13
Elings, V.14
-
2
-
-
24644500398
-
-
C. A. J. Putnam, K. O. van der Werf, B. G. De Grooth, N. F. van Hulst, and J. Greve, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 2454 (1994).
-
(1994)
Appl. Phys. Lett.
, vol.64
, pp. 2454
-
-
Putnam, C.A.J.1
Van Der Werf, K.O.2
De Grooth, B.G.3
Van Hulst, N.F.4
Greve, J.5
-
3
-
-
0028100908
-
-
C. A. J. Putnam, K. O. van der Werf, B. G. De Grooth, N. F. van Hulst, and J. Greve, Biophys. J. 67, 1749 (1994).
-
(1994)
Biophys. J.
, vol.67
, pp. 1749
-
-
Putnam, C.A.J.1
Van Der Werf, K.O.2
De Grooth, B.G.3
Van Hulst, N.F.4
Greve, J.5
-
4
-
-
0002000240
-
-
G. Y. Chen, R. J. Warmack, P. I. Oden, and T. Thundat, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14, 1313 (1996).
-
(1996)
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B
, vol.14
, pp. 1313
-
-
Chen, G.Y.1
Warmack, R.J.2
Oden, P.I.3
Thundat, T.4
-
5
-
-
0033204931
-
-
S. T. J. van Noort, O. H. Willemsen, K. O. van der Werf, B. G. de Grooth, and J. Greve, Langmuir 15, 7101 (1999).
-
(1999)
Langmuir
, vol.15
, pp. 7101
-
-
Van Noort, S.T.J.1
Willemsen, O.H.2
Van Der Werf, K.O.3
De Grooth, B.G.4
Greve, J.5
-
14
-
-
84861283993
-
-
for a comparison of the motion of a cantilever with (a) Q∼2 (fluid tapping) and (b) Q∼50 (operation in air) with the same free amplitude and set-point. The top panels show how the cantilever base and cantilever move with respect to the surface. Notice how much more the base needs to move with low- Q system compared to the high- Q system. The middle panels show the deflection trajectories over one cycle, with the low- Q system displaying the enhanced anharmonicity characteristic of fluid tapping AFM. The bottom panels show the time resolved tip/sample force interactions. This document can be mached via a direct link in the online article's HTML reference section or via the EPAPS homepage
-
See EPAPS Document No. E-APPLAB-87-013542 for a comparison of the motion of a cantilever with (a) Q∼2 (fluid tapping) and (b) Q∼50 (operation in air) with the same free amplitude and set-point. The top panels show how the cantilever base and cantilever move with respect to the surface. Notice how much more the base needs to move with low- Q system compared to the high- Q system. The middle panels show the deflection trajectories over one cycle, with the low- Q system displaying the enhanced anharmonicity characteristic of fluid tapping AFM. The bottom panels show the time resolved tip/sample force interactions. This document can be mached via a direct link in the online article's HTML reference section or via the EPAPS homepage (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps. html).
-
EPAPS Document No. E-APPLAB-87-013542
, vol.E-APPLAB-87-013542
-
-
|