Variance and uncertainty in the expected number of occurrences in reserve selection

Conservation Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1663-1667

  Moilanen, Atte ^a   Cabeza, Mar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Complementarity; Maximum expected coverage; Persistence; Site selection algorithm; Threat; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; NATURE RESERVE; PERSISTENCE; SITE SELECTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 28344444123     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00203.x     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Arthur, J. L., R. G. Haight, C. A. Montgomery, and S. Polasky. 2002. Analysis of the threshold and expected coverage approaches to the probabilistic reserve site selection problem. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 7:81-89.
2. Cabeza, M. 2003. Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design. Ecology Letters 6:665-672.
3. Cabeza, M., A. Moilanen, and H. P. Possingham. 2004. Metapopulaton dynamics and reserve network design. Pages 541-564 in I. Hanski and O. Gaggiotti, editors. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Burlington, Massachusetts.
4. Camm, J. D., S. K. Norman, S. Polasky, and A. R. Solow. 2002. Nature reserve site selection to maximize expected species covered. Operations Research 50:946-955.
5. Guisan, A., and N. E. Zimmermann. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135:147-186.
6. Haight, R. G., C. S. Revelle, and S. A. Snyder. 2000. An integer optimization approach to a probabilistic reserve site selection problem. Operations Research 48:697-708.
7. Harvey, A. C., E. Ruiz, and N. Shephard. 1994. Multi-variate stochastic variance models. Review of Economical Studies 61:247-264.
8. Leslie, H., M. Ruckelshaus, I. R. Ball, S. Andelman, and H. P. Possingham. 2003. Using siting algorithms in the design of marine reserve networks. Ecological Applications 13:185-198.
9. Margules, C. R., and R. L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243-253.
10. McDonnell, M. D., H. P. Possingham, I. R. Ball, and E. A. Cousins. 2002. Mathematical methods for spatially cohesive reserve design. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 7:107-114.
11. Ovaskainen, O., and I. Hanski. 2003. Extinction threshold in metapopulation models. Annales Zoologici Fennici 40:81-97.
12. Pressey, R. L., and S. L. Tully. 1994. The cost of ad hoc reservation: a case study in the Western Division of New South Wales. Australian Journal of Ecology 19:375-384.
13. Pressey, R. L., H. P. Possingham, and J. R. Day. 1997. Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biological Conservation 80:207-219.
14. ReVelle, C. S., J. C. Williams, and J. J. Boland. 2002. Counterpart models in facility location science and reserve selection science. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 7:71-80.
15. Sarkar, S., C. Pappas, J. Garson, A. Aggarwal, and S. Cameron. 2004. Place prioritization for biodiversity conservation using probabilistic surrogate distribution data. Diversity and Distributions 10:125-133.
16. Williams, J., C. S. ReVelle, and S. A. Levin. 2004. Using mathematical optimization models to design nature reserves. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:98-105.
17. Williams, P.H., and M. B. Araújo. 2000. Using probabilities of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 267:1959-1966.