How does arthropod segment number evolve? - Some clues from centipedes

Evolution and Development

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 600-607

  Arthur, Wallace ^a   Chipman, Ariel D ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPOD; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; SEGMENTATION;

ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; CONFERENCE PAPER; EVOLUTION; MORPHOGENESIS; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BODY PATTERNING; EVOLUTION;

ARTHROPODA; CHILOPODA; GEOPHILOMORPHA;

EID: 28244492994     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2005.05063.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Archey, G. 1936. Revision of the chilopoda of New Zealand. Rec. Auck. Inst. Mus. 2: 43-70.
2. Arthur, W. 1999. Variable segment number in centipedes: population genetics meets evolutionary developmental biology. Evol. Dev. 1: 62-69.
3. Arthur, W., and Blackburn, J. 1999. Limited variation in segment number in populations of Brachygeophilus truncorum and Geophilus insculptus in Northumberland and Durham. Bull. Br. Myr. Group 15: 9-13.
4. Arthur, W., Foddai, D., Kettle, C., Lewis, J. G. E., Luczynski, M., and Minelli, A. 2001. Analysis of segment number and enzyme variation in a centipede reveals a cryptic species, Geophilus easoni sp nov., and raises questions about speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 74: 489-499.
5. Arthur, W., and Kettle, C. 2001. Geographic patterning of variation in segment number in geophilomorph centipedes: clines and speciation. Evol. Dev. 3: 34-40.
6. Bakker, K. 1961. An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Arch. Neerl. Zool. 14: 200-281.
7. Bateson, W. 1894. Materials for the Study of Variation, Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species. Macmillan, London.
8. Bonato, L., Foddai, D., and Minelli, A. 2003. Evolutionary trends and patterns in centipede segment number based on a cladistic analysis of Mecistocephalidae (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha). Systematic Entomol. 28: 539-579.
9. Chipman, A. D., Arthur, W., and Akam, M. 2004a. A double segment periodicity underlies segment formation in centipede development. Curr. Biol. 14: 1250-1255.
10. Chipman, A. D., Arthur, W., and Akam, M. 2004b. Early development and segment formation in the centipede Strigamia maritima (Geophilomorpha). Evol. Dev. 6: 78-89.
11. Eason, E. H. 1964. Centipedes of the British Isles. Warne, London.
12. Eason, E. H. 1979. The effect of the environment on the number of trunk-segments in the Geophilomorpha with special reference to Geophilus carpophagus Leach. In M. Camatini (ed.). Myriapod Biology. Academic Press, New York.
13. Falconer, D. S., and MacKay, T. F. C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, London.
14. Foddai, D. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships within geophilomorph centipedes based on morphological characters: a preliminary report. Mem. Mus. Civ. Storia Naturale, Verona, 2. serie, sez Sci. della vita 13: 67-68.
15. Foddai, D., and Minelli, A. 2000. Phylogeny of geophilomorph centipedes: old wisdom and new insights from morphology. In J. Wytwer and S. Golovatch (eds.). Progress in Studies on Myriapoda and Onychophora. Fragmenta Faunistica, Vol. 43, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, pp. 61-71.
16. Hughes, C. L., and Kaufman, T. C. 2002. Exploring the myriapod body plan: expression of the ten Hox genes in a centipede. Development 129: 1225-1238.
17. Hughes, N. C., Chapman, R. E., and Adrain, J. M. 1999. The stability of thoracic segmentation in trilobites: a case study in developmental and ecological constraints. Evol. Dev. 1: 24-35.
18. Jones, J. S., Leith, B. H., and Rawlings, P. 1977. Polymorphism in Cepaea: a problem with too many solutions? Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systematics 8: 109-143.
19. Kettle, C., and Arthur, W. 2000. Latitudinal cline in segment number in an arthropod species, Strigamia maritima. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 1393-1397.
20. Kettle, C., Johnstone, J., Jowett, T., Arthur, H., and Arthur, W. 2002. The pattern of segment formation, as revealed by engrailed expression, in a centipede with a variable number of segments. Evol. Dev. 5: 198-207.
21. Lewis, J. G. E. 1961. The life history and ecology of the littoral centipede Strigamia (Scolioplanes) maritima (Leach). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 137: 221-248.
22. Lewis, J. G. E. 1962. The ecology, distribution and taxonomy of the centipedes found on the shore in the Plymouth area. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 42: 655-664.
23. Lewis, J. G. E. 1981. The Biology of Centipedes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Lewis, J. G. E. 1985. Centipedes entering houses with particular reference to Geophilus carpophagus Leach. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 121: 257-259.
25. Minelli, A. 1985. Post-embryonic development and the phylogeny of geophilomorph centipedes (Chilopoda). Bijdr. Dierkd. 55: 143-148.
26. Minelli, A., and Bortoletto, S. 1988. Myriapod metamerism and arthropod segmentation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 33: 323-343.
27. Minelli, A., Foddai, D., Pereira, L. A., and Lewis, J. G. E. 2000. The evolution of segmentation of centipede trunk and appendages. J. Zool. Systematics Evol. Res. 38: 103-117.
28. Minelli, A., Pasqual, C., and Etonti, G. 1984. I Chilopodi geofilomorfi del gen. Himantarium C. L. Koch con particolare riferimento alle popolazioni Italiane. Lavori - Soc. Ven. Sci. Nat. 9: 73-84.
29. Misioch, M. 1978. Variation of characters in some geophilid chilopods. Abh. Verh. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg. 21/22: 55-62.
30. Prunescu, C., and Capuse, I. 1971. Nouvelles données sur le début du développment post-embryonnaire chez les myriopodes de l'ordre Geophilomorpha. Trav. Mus. Hist. Nat. "Gr.Antipa" 11: 111-119.
31. Robertson, F. W. 1957. Studies in quantitative inheritance. XI. Genetic and environmental correlation between body size and egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 55: 428-443.
32. Schlichting, C. D., and Pigliucci, M. 1998. Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
33. Shear, W. A., and Bonamo, P. M. 1988. Devonobiomorpha, a new order of centipeds (Chilopoda) from the Middle Devonian of Gilboa, New York State, USA, and the phylogeny of centiped orders. Am. Mus. Novit. 2927: 1-30.
34. Waddington, C. H. 1957. The Strategy of the Genes. Allen & Unwin, London.